Double Mesh Modification of Incisional Hernia Can be Effective Without Severe Local Complications

NCT ID: NCT04166201

Last Updated: 2019-11-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

22 patients of incisional hernia underwent treatment by double mesh modification of the original Chevrel's technique the primary outcome was recurrence, skin necrosis secondery out come was pain hematoma seroma

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a clinical trial carried out on 22 patients with midline incisional hernia, using the double mesh modification of Chevrel's technique, all the procedures were performed by the same group of surgeons.

The exclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3, and 4, inflammatory bowel disease, urgent setting, recurrences and previous abdominal neoplasms with high risk of local recurrence (rectal cancer). All patients were informed and consented before recruitment in the study All patients received an intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis with subcutaneous administration of fractionated heparin before surgery when indicated.

Surgical technique All patients were operated on with the double mesh modification of Chevrel's technique. The previous scar was excised then, dissection of the subcutaneous space was performed deep to the neck of the hernia, not wider than 1cm from the edges of the defect, then the sac was opened and resected, the defect size was measured, the skin and subcutaneous tissue was dissected off the anterior rectus sheath only allowing dissection of an anterior rectus sheath flap just sufficient to close the defect without tension After that a bilateral longitudinal incisions was done on the anterior surface of the anterior rectus sheath and a medial anterior rectus sheath flap was dissected off the rectus abdominis muscle, both recti muscles was dissected off the posterior rectus sheath opening the retrorectus space, each of the medial anterior rectus sheath flaps was sutured to that of the other side with slowly absorbed sutures closing the defect without any tension and reforming the posterior rectus sheath

A sizable prolene mesh was fixed with prolene sutures in the retrorectus space spreading between lateral ends of the space and tunneled up 4 cm in the retrorectus space far from vertical edges of the defect,Then the anterior rectus sheath was closed using a prolene mesh tailored to the size of the space between the lateral flaps of both sides and sutured to the edges of the lateral flaps with interrupted non absorbable sutures.

suction drain is left in site, subcutaneous tissue was closed with Vicryl (3\\0) , skin was closed with prolene (3\\0), drain was removed when the amount of drainage is below 30 ml \\ day .

Data of the patients as demographic data, preoperative investigations, operative findings as defect size, operative time, early postoperative data as viability of skin flaps, wound infection, seroma and early hernia recurrence, late postoperative data as hernia recurrence. All data were collected, properly presented and analyzed using the SPSS package 22.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Incisional Hernia of Midline of Upper Abdomen Incisional Hernia of Midline of Lower Abdomen Incisional Hernia of Midline of Abdomen

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

22 patients with Incisional Hernia of Midline of the abdomen underwent hernioplasty by double mesh modification of Chevrel's technique follow up carried out for around 2 years for hernia recurrence pain early and late postoperative complications
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

modified chevrel technique

hernioplasty done with double mesh modification of chevrels technique

Group Type OTHER

double mesh hernioplasty with modified chevrel's technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hernioplasty done by modification of the chevrel's technique , no dissection further than 1 cm of the midline laterally, the medial flaps of the anterior rectus sheath is dissected of the anterior surface of the rectus abdominis muscle and sutured together reforming the posterior rectus sheath , one polypropylene mesh was fixed over the posterior rectus sheath and the other was tailored to raw area of the rectis abdominis muscle and sutured to the lateral free edges of the anterior rectus sheath

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

double mesh hernioplasty with modified chevrel's technique

hernioplasty done by modification of the chevrel's technique , no dissection further than 1 cm of the midline laterally, the medial flaps of the anterior rectus sheath is dissected of the anterior surface of the rectus abdominis muscle and sutured together reforming the posterior rectus sheath , one polypropylene mesh was fixed over the posterior rectus sheath and the other was tailored to raw area of the rectis abdominis muscle and sutured to the lateral free edges of the anterior rectus sheath

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• adult with midline incisional hernia

Exclusion Criteria

* (ASA) 3, and 4,
* inflammatory bowel disease,
* urgent setting,
* recurrences and previous abdominal neoplasms with high risk of local recurrence (rectal cancer).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hazem Nour Abdellatif

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zagazig Faculty of Medicine

Zagazig, Sharqya, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

modified chevrel technique

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.