Comparative Effectiveness of Socket Casting Methods: Improving Form and Fit

NCT ID: NCT04141748

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall objective is to compare hand casting to standing hydrostatic pressure casting using a water cylinder in persons with lower limb amputation. Our overall hypothesis is that standing hydrostatic pressure casting with a water cylinder will lead to more consistent and efficient residual limb shape capture and improved initial socket fit and comfort compared to hand casting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One of the most important components of restoring function in persons with lower limb amputation is the precise fitting of the prosthetic socket to the residual limb. However, this is challenging because the residual limb is dynamic in shape and volume. Additionally, prosthetic socket fabrication processes influence socket fit. These processes typically consist of residual limb shape capture, positive mold rectification, initial diagnostic socket fitting, and definitive prosthesis delivery. The most prevalent residual limb shape capture method involves a negative wrap cast in a non-weight bearing position and manual manipulation of the cast to conform to the residual limb shape. With this technique it is challenging to accurately capture the bony contours and distribute pressure evenly around the residual limb. To improve shape capture, techniques that rely less on manual manipulation by the prosthetist, such as standing hydrostatic pressure casting with a water cylinder have been developed. Given the use of physics to shape the residual limb, it has been proposed that pressure casting results in better fitting and more comfortable sockets, however this has not yet been demonstrated. The overall objective is to compare hand casting to standing hydrostatic pressure casting using a water cylinder in persons with lower limb amputation. Our overall hypothesis is that standing hydrostatic pressure casting with a water cylinder will lead to more consistent and efficient residual limb shape capture and improved initial socket fit and comfort compared to hand casting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Limb Amputation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Prospective, multi-center, assessor-blinded, cross-over study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hand Casting

hand cast will be taken using a circumferential plaster of Paris or fiber glass wrap of the residual limb with the subject in a seated position

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hand Casting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

plaster of Paris or fiberglass bandages are wrapped around the residual limb

standing hydrostatic pressure casting with a water cylinder

hand cast will be taken using a circumferential plaster of Paris wrap of the residual limb with the subject in a seated position. The residual limb is then placed into the Symphonie Aqua System while in a weight bearing standing position.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Symphonie Aqua SystemTM

Intervention Type DEVICE

a water filled cylinder that can be pressurized around the residual limb to support body weight

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Symphonie Aqua SystemTM

a water filled cylinder that can be pressurized around the residual limb to support body weight

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hand Casting

plaster of Paris or fiberglass bandages are wrapped around the residual limb

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* unilateral lower limb amputation (transtibial and transfemoral)
* current prosthesis users

Exclusion Criteria

* poor residual limb sensation
* a superficial neuroma that is painful to pressure
* an open sore on the residual limb
* a residual limb circumference or body weight that exceeds the size or weight limits of the Symphonie Aqua SystemTM (i.e., \>58cm and 170kg for persons with transtibial amputation and \>78cm and 170kg for persons with transfemoral amputation
* persons who are unable to stand for the 4-6 minutes required for casting (e.g. persons with bilateral amputations).
* persons with new amputations (i.e., have been an amputee for less than 1 year)
* persons with transfemoral amputation who have a known silicone allergy or a femur length less than 5 inches
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

INAIL (Istituto Nazionale per L'Assicurazioni contro gli Infortune sul Lavoro)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Steven Gard

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Gard, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NUPOC

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis VA Heath Care System

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

INAIL

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Italy

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

W81XWH1910835

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

E-Socket, Diagnostic Monitoring
NCT06432335 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA