Short-term Postural Training for Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT04137952

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Generalization refers to skill transfer under various working spaces following motor practice. The extent of generalization effect links causal to in-depth recognition of error properties during motor practice. Idiom says "imperfect practice makes perfect". It could be beneficial for the elderly to gain superior capacity of balance transfer skill under the short-term productive failure learning environments. In contrast to traditional visual feedback that uses error avoidance training to optimize target balance task, the present 3-year proposal is to propose three potential neuro-cognitive strategies to improve motor skill transfer following stabilometer training. The strategies are expected to enhance opportunities of error experience and motor exploration via modified visual feedback, underlying facilitations of attentional resource and error-related neural networks. In the first year, the neuro-cognitive strategy for balance practice is progressive augmentation of visual error size to improve balance skill transfer. In the second year, the neuro-cognitive strategy for balance practice is visual feedback with virtual uncertainness of motor goal. In the third year, the neuro-cognitive strategy for balance practice is stroboscopic vision. EEG and central of pressure will be processed with non-linear approaches. Graph theory will characterize EEG functional connectivity and brain network efficiency regarding to brain mechanisms for practice-related leaning transfer. Trajectories of central of pressure will be analyzed with stabilogram diffusion analysis to reveal behavior mechanisms for practice-related variations in feedback and feedforward process for error corrections.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aging Balance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

deterministic visual error gain

Day1(Pretest):

1. stabilometer stance, 3 times/1 min
2. air pillow stance, 3 time/30 sec
3. poture-supraposture dual task, 3 times/1 min

Day2 to Day5:

1. Exp.group:27 times of posture tracking with high visual error gain.
2. Control group:27 times of posture training with normal visual error gain.

Day6 (Posttest):

1. stabilometer stance, 3 times/1 min
2. air pillow stance, 3 time/30 sec
3. poture-supraposture dual task, 3 times/1 min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

size of error visual feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The strategies are expected to enhance opportunities of error experience and motor exploration via modified visual feedback, underlying facilitations of attentional resource and error-related neural networks.

stochastic visual noise

Day1(Pretest):

1. stabilometer stance, 3 times/1 min
2. air pillow stance, 3 time/30 sec
3. poture-supraposture dual task, 3 times/1 min

Day2 to Day5:

1. Exp.group A:27 times of posture training with posture tracking signal-to-noise ratio=2:1.
2. Exp.group B:27 times of posture training with posture tracking signal-to-noise ratio=4:1.
3. Control group:27 times of posture training with normal visual error gain.

Day6(Posttest):

1. stabilometer stance, 3 times/1 min
2. air pillow stance, 3 time/30 sec
3. poture-supraposture dual task, 3 times/1 min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

size of error visual feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The strategies are expected to enhance opportunities of error experience and motor exploration via modified visual feedback, underlying facilitations of attentional resource and error-related neural networks.

intermittent visual gain

Day1 (Pretest):

1. stabilometer stance with wearing flash glasses (low frequency with opaque ratio 50%), 4 times/45 sec
2. stabilometer stance with wearing flash glasses (high frequency with opaque ratio 50%), 4 times/45 sec.
3. stabilometer stance with wearing flash glasses (clear), 4 times/45 sec
4. air pillow stance, 8 times/1 min

Day2 (training section):

1. Exp. group:Posture tracking with wearing flash glasses (low frequency with opaque ratio 50%), 12 times/45 sec.
2. Control group:Posture tracking with wearing flash glasses (clear), 12 times/45 sec.

Day3 (Posttest):

1. stabilometer stance with wearing flash glasses (low frequency with opaque ratio 50%), 4 times/45 sec
2. stabilometer stance with wearing flash glasses (high frequency with opaque ratio 50%), 4 times/45 sec
3. stabilometer stance with wearing flash glasses (clear), 4 times/45 sec
4. air pillow stance, 8 times/1 min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

size of error visual feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The strategies are expected to enhance opportunities of error experience and motor exploration via modified visual feedback, underlying facilitations of attentional resource and error-related neural networks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

size of error visual feedback

The strategies are expected to enhance opportunities of error experience and motor exploration via modified visual feedback, underlying facilitations of attentional resource and error-related neural networks.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

virtual uncertainness of motor goals stroboscopic vision

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age above 60 years old healthy older adults without a history of falls.
* Able to understand and give informed consent.
* The Mini-Mental State Examination test score above 25-30.
* Lower limb muscle strength is evaluated as G grade
* The corrected visual acuity was within the normal range.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any known history of mental illness
* Any neuromuscular or degenerative neurological disease(ex:stroke、SCI、TBI...etc)
* Any known history of cerebral cerebellar disease or intracranial metal implants.
* Weak of hearing or wearing a hearing aid
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hwang Ing-Shiou, Phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

NCKU, Institute of Allied Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Chen Kong University Hospital

Taian, Eastern District, Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MOST 108-2314-B-006-071 -

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.