Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
114 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-15
2023-03-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mobile Mental Health Stigma Reduction Intervention Among Black Adults
NCT06316804
Effectiveness of a Mobile Texting Intervention for People With Serious Mental Illness
NCT03062267
Electronic Self-management Resource Training for Mental Health
NCT01304862
Behavioral Economics Intervention to Increase Treatment Seeking in the National Guard
NCT04098588
Evaluation of the Readiness Supportive Leadership Training - National Guard
NCT07203170
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
M-IBM
M-IBM is based on a slightly modified version of the word sentence association paradigm focused on words and sentences related to common concerns among those with elevated anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns (i.e., losing control of mental processes).
M-IBM
In this paradigm, an ambiguous word or two-word phrase related to ASCC is followed by a sentence that resolves the word-sentence meaning as threatening or benign. For example, participants are presented with an ambiguous word or two-word phrase for 1 second. On half the trials the combination of the word/phrase and sentence creates a benign meaning (as in the previous example). On the other half of trials this combination creates an anxious-threat meaning Participants are required to judge the relatedness of the word/phrase and the sentence. Participants are given feedback during training such that judging the anxious-threat combinations to be "unrelated" and the benign combinations as being "related" would produce a "correct" response. In contrast, if participants produce an "incorrect" response they see "incorrect".
Control IBM
Control-IBM is identical to M-IBM except that the sentence that follows the cue word is not related to an anxious-threat interpretation of the cue word.
Control-IBM
Placebo IBM where sentences are not related to anxious threat meaning of cue word.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
M-IBM
In this paradigm, an ambiguous word or two-word phrase related to ASCC is followed by a sentence that resolves the word-sentence meaning as threatening or benign. For example, participants are presented with an ambiguous word or two-word phrase for 1 second. On half the trials the combination of the word/phrase and sentence creates a benign meaning (as in the previous example). On the other half of trials this combination creates an anxious-threat meaning Participants are required to judge the relatedness of the word/phrase and the sentence. Participants are given feedback during training such that judging the anxious-threat combinations to be "unrelated" and the benign combinations as being "related" would produce a "correct" response. In contrast, if participants produce an "incorrect" response they see "incorrect".
Control-IBM
Placebo IBM where sentences are not related to anxious threat meaning of cue word.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ownership of a smartphone
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Military Suicide Research Consortium
OTHER
University of Southern Mississippi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Southern Mississippi
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
W81XWH-16-2-0004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.