Telomere Associated Variables (TAVs) in Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04124900
Last Updated: 2023-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
509 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-07-15
2023-09-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of the PROSTAV test in cutting down on unnecessary biopsies in prostate cancer screening/early diagnosis. PROSTAV is a minimally invasive test, easy to implement as biomarker for prostate cancer diagnosis. The efficacy of the PROSTAV test is clinically validated by the results obtained in a previous study, LL-HURS-ONC001.
The purpose of this study is to advance in the development of new biomarkers in areas where there is a clinical need and where the telomeric profile influences medical decisions within the patient's clinical context. The association level between each individual's telomere biology and the results of the prostate biopsy will be confirmed. Data will be collected to subsequently delve deeper into and accurately establish the effect of this measure in prostate cancer patient management to substantiate its implementation in standard care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comprehensive Monitoring of Men With Prostate Cancer Cared for by "Active Surveillance
NCT05840484
Long-Term Prospective Registry in Prostate Cancer Patients From Diverse Urology Practice Settings Following Prolaris® Testing
NCT04404894
Health Status, Quality of Life and Function in Survivors After Radical Treatment for Prostate Cancer. Part IIB
NCT05200039
Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With High-dose Radiotherapy and Hormone Therapy
NCT01800058
Exploiting Risk-Based Risk Stratification in Early Prostate Cancer to Discriminate Progressors From Non-Progressors
NCT04340245
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will be initiated immediately after approval by the IRB and has an overall length of 12 months (recruiting time).
The main purpose of the present study is to determine the efficacy of the PROSTAV test as a prostate cancer biomarker developed by Life Length and which has been subject to internal validation in a previous study (LL-HURS-ONC001). For this purpose, the risk-prediction algorithm based on telomere and clinical variables will be used. This allows to back medical decisions in patients with uncertain PC diagnosis based on their PSA levels and the need to perform a prostate biopsy. The standard of care of the participating hospitals and following the European Urology Association recommendations, patients with PSA \>3 (prostate-specific antigen) and/or positive digital rectal examination (DRE) are considered at risk for developing PC. However, some medical advisors of the sponsor stated that sometimes patients with PSA levels\<3 are also diagnosed with prostate cancer. For this reason, it has been decided to remove the lower limit of PSA as inclusion criteria.
This study includes only one group of patients defined by inclusion criteria and who will be classified in different groups after a biopsy is performed: 1) patients with a positive biopsy result (diagnosed with significant prostate cancer) (Gleason score \>6), and without significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≤6) or no cancer. Before knowing the histopathological results of the biopsy, the PROSTAV test will be performed. Depending on the results of the PROSTAV test, the physician will write down which decision he or she would have made as to performing or not a biopsy: zero (0) for a low-risk result in the PROSTAV test, in which case no biopsy would have been performed; and one (1) for a PC risk result in the PROSTAV test, in which case a biopsy would have been performed. Regardless of what the result of the PROSTAV test is, all patients will undergo a biopsy since the result in PROSTAV test will not influence the standard of care in this study.
A 10 ml. sample is required from all subjects included in the study for telomere analysis. This sample is obtained from blood drawn before performing the diagnostic prostate biopsy. The sample must be drawn within a 90-day period prior to biopsy.
The design of the present project allows for one single study phase. This study is a clinical efficacy validation study in patients in whom the results of potential biopsy sparing are compared after evaluating medical decisions based on the use of the PROSTAV test.
The point of origin of the samples are the different participating centers that will use the samples for application of the telomere biology evaluation techniques.
Mononuclear cells in peripheral blood from all samples will be isolated and analyzed to determine values of Telomere Associated Variables (TAVs).
For the calculation of the telomere variables, the Sponsor will use the High-Throughput Quantitative Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization technique (HT-Q-FISH).
Data resulting from each biological sample will be analyzed to obtain a defined risk assessment based on the algorithm of the PROSTAV test. The purpose of the analysis is the integration of the data resulting from telomere measurements (average, median, percentage of short telomeres, ratio of short and long telomeres, etc.) and PSA and free PSA levels, age and the DRE results of the patient's medical record to determine whether they are low-risk patients, in which a biopsy would not be necessary to confirm presence of prostate cancer. By doing this, it is intending to demonstrate the efficacy of the PROSTAV test, since biopsies would be performed in any case and also show the test's sensitivity and specificity values in clinical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients at prostate cancer risk diagnosed
The study is composed of one single subject cohort. After risk evaluation, prostate biopsies will be performed for diagnostic purposes on all recruited patients. The cases are sorted into two groups after diagnosis:
* Group 1: patients at prostate cancer risk diagnosed with significant prostate cancer after prostatic biopsy (Gleason \>6).
* Group 2: patients at prostate cancer risk diagnosed free of cancer after prostate biopsy. There will be a subdivision within this group in patients without significant prostate cancer ( No cancer o Non-significant prostate cancer (Gleason ≤6)).
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To have given written consent to participate in the study.
* To be classified as a patient at prostate cancer risk according to criteria of high PSA levels (\<10 ng/ml) and the urologist's decision to perform a prostate biopsy in standard of care.
* To be diagnosed by a prostate biopsy with or without concomitant MRI.
* Caucasic race
Exclusion Criteria
* Existing serious active liver, lung or kidney disease, as well as severe active infections.
* Existing serious disease or psychiatric disorder that prevents them from expressing informed consent and/or if patients are not able to follow protocol procedures and give their informed consent.
* Patients at risk resulting from conventional blood extraction.
* Subjects with active neoplasm diagnosed during the past five years.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Life Length SL
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maria José Requena
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Reina Sofía
Enrique Gómez, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Reina Sofía
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Urological Research Network, Corp.
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Houston Methodist Research Institute
Houston, Texas, United States
Hospital Infanta Margarita
Cabra, Córdoba, Spain
Instituto Médico Tecnológico
Barcelona, , Spain
University Hospital Reina Sofía
Córdoba, , Spain
ROC Clinic
Madrid, , Spain
Instituto de Urología LYX
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Instituto Valenciano de Oncología
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000 Jan 7;100(1):57-70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. No abstract available.
Shay JW, Wright WE, Werbin H. Defining the molecular mechanisms of human cell immortalization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Apr 16;1072(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(91)90003-4.
Hahn WC, Counter CM, Lundberg AS, Beijersbergen RL, Brooks MW, Weinberg RA. Creation of human tumour cells with defined genetic elements. Nature. 1999 Jul 29;400(6743):464-8. doi: 10.1038/22780.
Wright WE, Shay JW. Telomere dynamics in cancer progression and prevention: fundamental differences in human and mouse telomere biology. Nat Med. 2000 Aug;6(8):849-51. doi: 10.1038/78592.
Shay JW, Zou Y, Hiyama E, Wright WE. Telomerase and cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Apr;10(7):677-85. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.7.677.
Kim NW, Piatyszek MA, Prowse KR, Harley CB, West MD, Ho PL, Coviello GM, Wright WE, Weinrich SL, Shay JW. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science. 1994 Dec 23;266(5193):2011-5. doi: 10.1126/science.7605428.
Shay JW, Bacchetti S. A survey of telomerase activity in human cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1997 Apr;33(5):787-91. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00062-2.
Breslow RA, Shay JW, Gazdar AF, Srivastava S. Telomerase and early detection of cancer: a National Cancer Institute workshop. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 May 7;89(9):618-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.9.618. No abstract available.
Shay JW. Telomerase in cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Cancer J Sci Am. 1998 May;4 Suppl 1:S26-34. No abstract available.
Norton JC, Holt SE, Wright WE, Shay JW. Enhanced detection of human telomerase activity. DNA Cell Biol. 1998 Mar;17(3):217-9. doi: 10.1089/dna.1998.17.217.
Hiyama E, Hiyama K, Yokoyama T, Matsuura Y, Piatyszek MA, Shay JW. Correlating telomerase activity levels with human neuroblastoma outcomes. Nat Med. 1995 Mar;1(3):249-55. doi: 10.1038/nm0395-249.
Sommerfeld HJ, Meeker AK, Piatyszek MA, Bova GS, Shay JW, Coffey DS. Telomerase activity: a prevalent marker of malignant human prostate tissue. Cancer Res. 1996 Jan 1;56(1):218-22.
Mehle C, Piatyszek MA, Ljungberg B, Shay JW, Roos G. Telomerase activity in human renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 1996 Jul 4;13(1):161-6.
Tatsumoto N, Hiyama E, Murakami Y, Imamura Y, Shay JW, Matsuura Y, Yokoyama T. High telomerase activity is an independent prognostic indicator of poor outcome in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Jul;6(7):2696-701.
Shay JW, Gazdar AF. Telomerase in the early detection of cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1997 Feb;50(2):106-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.2.106.
Gurel B, Iwata T, Koh CM, Yegnasubramanian S, Nelson WG, De Marzo AM. Molecular alterations in prostate cancer as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic targets. Adv Anat Pathol. 2008 Nov;15(6):319-31. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31818a5c19.
Heaphy CM, Meeker AK. The potential utility of telomere-related markers for cancer diagnosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2011 Jun;15(6):1227-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01284.x.
Hou L, Joyce BT, Gao T, Liu L, Zheng Y, Penedo FJ, Liu S, Zhang W, Bergan R, Dai Q, Vokonas P, Hoxha M, Schwartz J, Baccarelli A. Blood Telomere Length Attrition and Cancer Development in the Normative Aging Study Cohort. EBioMedicine. 2015 Apr 13;2(6):591-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.04.008. eCollection 2015 Jun.
Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, van den Bergh RCN, Van den Broeck T, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
Humphrey PA, Moch H, Cubilla AL, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PROSTAV001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.