Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
236 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-06-30
2025-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Aim 1: To evaluate the accuracy of T2W MRI, DCE-MRI and their combined data for staging prostate cancer.
* Aim 2: To evaluate the accuracy of MRI in determining tumor volume in the prostate gland.
* Aim 3: To evaluate the accuracy of MRI in grading prostate cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Imaging Studies to Check the Local Response of Prostate Cancer to Radiation Therapy
NCT01834001
Profiling of Radiological Factors in Treatment and Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
NCT03354416
Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Evaluate Prostate Cancer
NCT00182624
Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Locate and Characterize Prostate Cancer
NCT00082147
Prostate Cancer Monitoring Using [18F]DCFPyL and Blood Based Biomarkers
NCT03585114
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In order to prospectively validate these goals we will recruit successive patients who have been scheduled for prostate removal to participate to our protocol. Each patient will be studied with an ERC MRI at 3T using T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, DCE 3D T1-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy (MRS). A pathologist using whole mount preparations will independently analyze each patient's prostate specimen. The whole mount data will be used as the standard against which we will compare the observations and data obtained from the 3T MRI findings.
Aim 1: To evaluate the accuracy of T2W MRI, DCE-MRI and their combined data for staging prostate cancer.
Supplementing T2W imaging with the high-resolution capability of 3TMR, we will apply standard morphologic criteria used at 1.5T to determine the presence or absence of extracapsular extension (ECE) of disease. The possible incremental value of high spatial resolution, dynamic contrast-enhanced data will be investigated. MRI results will be compared to ECE determination at whole-mount pathology.
Aim 2: To evaluate the accuracy of MRI in determining tumor volume in the prostate gland.
Using dynamic-contrast enhanced MRI with parametric analyses and T2-weighted images, both at smaller voxel sizes than have been used previously, will be our approach. Tumor volumes determined with MRI will be compared to those determined at pathology.
Aim 3: To evaluate the accuracy of MRI in grading prostate cancer.
The enhanced resolution available at 3T offers new opportunities to compare Gleason grades with independent and combined assessments of tissue kinetics and metabolism. Pixel by pixel parametric analyses will be obtained. Furthermore, choline to citrate and choline plus creatine to citrate ratios determined using MRS techniques will be obtained. Single voxel techniques will first be employed, followed by 3D chemical shift imaging, when the latter becomes available at 3T. DCE and MRS data will be compared both separately and in combination to the histologic Gleason scores of the comparable tumor identified at whole mount pathology.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prostate Cancer
Males with prostate cancer, referred for biopsy or radical prostatectomy
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Written documentation from the urologist stating the anticipation that the patient will undergo radical prostatectomy or biopsy of the prostate within six months of MRI.
3. The interval between biopsy and protocol MRI must not be less than 2 weeks.
4. Pathologic specimens from radical prostatectomy must be provided for whole mount analysis.
5. Patients will sign a study-specific consent prior to study entry.
6. Men above the age of 40 years old
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients unwilling or unable to undergo MRI including patients with contra-indications to MRI such as the presence of cardiac pacemakers or non-compatible intracranial vascular clips.
3. Patients who cannot tolerate or have contra-indications to ERC insertion; for example, patients who have had a prior abdominoperineal resection of the rectum or have Crohn's disease.
4. Patients with an allergic reaction to latex.
5. Cryosurgery, surgery for prostate cancer including TURP, prostatic radiotherapy, including bradiotherapy for rectal cancer, androgen deprivation therapy, rectal surgery, or alternative medicine prior to radical prostatectomy.
6. Any metallic implant (e.g. hip) or device that might distort local magnetic field and compromise quality of MRI.
7. Radical prostatectomy or biopsy of the prostate not planned to be performed within six (6) months of protocol MRI.
8. Patients who have undergone BCG for bladder cancer.
9. Patients with severe motion artifacts rendering the data unusable.
10. Patients who have an allergic history to gadopentetate dimeglumine administration.
11. Patients with a contraindication to the administration of glucagon (pheochromocytoma, islet pancreatic tumor, or insulin-dependent diabetes) or a prior history of allergic reaction following glucagon administration.
40 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Alsop
Director of MR Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David C Alsop, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2006P000154
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.