ctDNA and Metabolites in CSF as Early Biomarkers of Secondary CNS Involvement in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
NCT ID: NCT04112238
Last Updated: 2022-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
75 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-08-29
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Testing for People With B-Cell Lymphoma
NCT06736613
Circulating Tumor DNA in Cerebrospinal Fluid as an Early Biomarker of Leptomeningeal Metastasis (LM)
NCT02071056
Measuring Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) Levels in People With Follicular Lymphoma
NCT04468841
Feasibility and Clinical Utility of Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in Identifying Actionable Alterations and Minimal Residual Disease for Lymphoma Patients Across Community Centers in Texas
NCT05676450
Testing Cerebrospinal Fluid for Cell-free Tumor DNA in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Brain Tumors
NCT05934630
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to learn whether tumor-derived cell-free circulating DNA (cfDNA) and/or metabolite profiles from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cells can be identified in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), before the malignant cells themselves are detectable in CSF. Thus the investigators aim to investigate the diagnostic potential of cfDNA and/or metabolites measured in blood and cerebrospinal fluid. The study is based on the following four hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1: Measurement of cfDNA and/or metabolites in CSF are more sensitive methods of detecting DLBCL involvement in CNS compared to conventional diagnostics.
Hypothesis 2: Quantitative cfDNA/metabolomics in CSF has independent prognostic value in DLBCL.
Hypothesis 3: cfDNA and/or metabolite profile in CSF detected at primary diagnosis predicts relapse of DLBCL in the CNS also when CNS-IPI is taken into account.
Hypothesis 4: Particular aberrations of cfDNA and/or metabolite profiles detected in blood (plasma) may, in some cases, be associated with CNS involvement in DLBCL patients and/or predict CNS relapse.
The study is composed of a pilot study including 5 patients with verified either primary or secondary CNS lymphoma followed by two studies: One including 40 patients with de novo DLBCL and one including 30 patients in a relapse setting. The patients will have to consent to having a lumbar puncture performed and blood samples taken before treatment initiation. After treatment a second set of lumbar puncture and blood samples will be requested.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Treatment of the relapse not initiated (except pretreatment with corticosteroids)
3. Age ≥ 18 years
4. Patient must consent to genetic and metabolomic analysis of their cancer
5. Written informed consent
1. Previously diagnosed histologically documented DLBCL
2. Verified relapsed DLBCL
3. ≥ 1 prior DLBCL treatments
4. Treatment of the relapse not initiated (except pretreatment with corticosteroids)
5. Being able to undergo standard assessment ( eg, Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET), MRI of the neuroaxis and bone marrow biopsy)
6. Tumor biopsy and/or bone-marrow biopsy used for diagnosis available
7. Age ≥ 18 years
8. ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2
9. Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
10. Patient must consent to permit genetic and metabolomic analysis of their cancer
11. Patient must consent to permit access to records in order to ascertain progression or relapse of their cancer
12. Written informed consent
1. A newly diagnosed and histologically verified DLBCL
2. No prior DLBCL treatments
3. Anti-lymphoma treatment not initiated (except pretreatment with corticosteroids)
4. CNS-IPI \>/= 3
5. Being able to undergo standard assessment ( eg, Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET), MRI of the neuroaxis and bone marrow biopsy)
6. Tumor biopsy and/or bone-marrow biopsy used for diagnosis available
7. Age ≥ 18 years
8. ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2
9. Life expectancy \>/= 12 weeks
10. Patient must consent to permit genetic analysis of their cancer
11. Patient must consent to permit access to records in order to ascertain progression or relapse of their cancer
12. Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Other contraindications to lumbar puncture according to local guidelines
3. Other previous or current hematological malignancy
4. Prior treatment for CNS disease (except CNS prophylaxis in first line lymphoma treatment)
5. Known CNS autoimmune or inflammatory disease
6. Known HIV infection
7. Patient is currently receiving treatment for DLBCL
Study 1
1. Evidence of a CNS mass creating mass-effect or midline shift such that lumbar puncture is contraindicated
2. Other contraindications to lumbar puncture according to local guidelines
3. Other previous or current hematological malignancy
4. Previous or current primary CNS malignancy including know DLBCL relapse to the CNS
5. Prior treatment for CNS disease (except CNS prophylaxis in first line lymphoma treatment)
6. Known CNS autoimmune or inflammatory disease
7. Known HIV infection
8. Patient is currently receiving treatment for DLBCL (except pretreatment with corticosteroids)
Study 2
1. Evidence of a CNS mass creating mass-effect or midline shift such that lumbar puncture is contraindicated
2. Other contraindications to lumbar puncture according to local guidelines
3. Other previous or current hematological malignancy
4. Previous or current primary CNS malignancy including primary CNS lymphoma
5. Prior treatment for CNS disease
6. Known CNS autoimmune or inflammatory disease
7. Known HIV infection
8. Patient is currently receiving treatment for DLBCL (except pretreatment with corticosteroids)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Herlev Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lars Møller Pedersen
Senior consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anne Elisabeth Reuben Tolley, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Herlev Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Herlev Hopital
Herlev, Capital Region, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CNSctDNA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.