Efficacy of a Phone-based Relapse Prevention for Anorexia Nervosa After a First Hospitalization

NCT ID: NCT04102475

Last Updated: 2022-03-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

270 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-18

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a highly challenging disease which consequences are serious. Relapse rate is estimated between 38 and 41% during the year following hospitalization. The efficacy of patients' phone contact procedure on relapse has been assessed and has shown interest in numerous disorders. However, no study has ever used phone contact as a relapse prevention intervention tool in AN.

Objective: To evaluate efficacy of a phone contact procedure to increase body weight at 12 months after a first hospitalization for AN, by comparison to standard medical follow-up. Secondary objectives are to evaluate effect of phone contact procedure on: change in body weight at 6 month, general psychopathology disorder, psychopathology disorder specific to AN, rate of usual follow-up visit, and medico-economic impact.

Method: Prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial, for subject over 15 years old presenting with diagnosis of AN. Patients randomized in EATLINE group will be contacted by phone at 15 days, 1, 2, 4 and 9 months after discharge from hospitalization. Patients in control group will benefit from usual follow-up.

Expected outcomes and perspectives:that there will be a significant decrease in relapse due to phone contact procedure compared to control group. Results would justify additional devices at the end of hospitalization, until development of various connected tools allowing to "stay in contact" with patients in order to optimize the current therapeutic possibilities of AN.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anorexia Nervosa

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

eatline group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eatline

Intervention Type OTHER

After discharge from a first hospitalization:

Phone calls at 15 days, 1, 2, 4 and 9 months by a trained psychologist. The phone interview will be guided by the same standardized frame, which was developed by a group of experts and tested with a group of patients. The purpose of this intervention is to provide a therapeutic and motivational approach, with positive reinforcement and reassurance.

* Added to treatment as usual (TAU): outpatient visits (at least monthly consultations) or scheduled hospitalizations
* 6- and 12-month assessments as an outpatient interview with an assessor who is blind to condition

control group

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Control

Intervention Type OTHER

After discharge from the first hospitalization:

* No specific phone calls
* TAU: outpatient visits (at least monthly consultations) or scheduled hospitalizations
* 6- and 12-month assessments as an outpatient interview with an assessor who is blind to condition

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eatline

After discharge from a first hospitalization:

Phone calls at 15 days, 1, 2, 4 and 9 months by a trained psychologist. The phone interview will be guided by the same standardized frame, which was developed by a group of experts and tested with a group of patients. The purpose of this intervention is to provide a therapeutic and motivational approach, with positive reinforcement and reassurance.

* Added to treatment as usual (TAU): outpatient visits (at least monthly consultations) or scheduled hospitalizations
* 6- and 12-month assessments as an outpatient interview with an assessor who is blind to condition

Intervention Type OTHER

Control

After discharge from the first hospitalization:

* No specific phone calls
* TAU: outpatient visits (at least monthly consultations) or scheduled hospitalizations
* 6- and 12-month assessments as an outpatient interview with an assessor who is blind to condition

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject over 15 years of age
* Diagnosis of AN (restrictive and/or purgative) according to DSM-5 criteria
* Included after a first inpatient hospitalization in specialized care
* Providing informed, dated and signed consent (for a minor, consent must be signed by both parents who have parental authority )
* With medical insurance
* Can be reached by telephone

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncompensated psychiatric pathology
* Refusal to participate in the study
* The inability to consent to care (patient or his/her legal representative)
* Pregnancy
* Major incapable subject or under guardianship or judicial protection
* Homelessness
* No mastery of reading and writing
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Health, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Lille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Olivier Cottencin, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Lille

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Général

Hénin-Beaumont, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hôpital Fontan2, CHU

Lille, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, GHICL

Lille, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Cliniqie Lautreamont

Loos, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

CHU de Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Nantes, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Olivier Cottencin, MD,PhD

Role: CONTACT

3 20 44 58 38 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Olivier COTTENCIN

Role: primary

00 33 3 20 44 58 38

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-A02536-49

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2017_73

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.