Identifying Precursors to Severe Problem Behavior

NCT ID: NCT04097431

Last Updated: 2024-03-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-07

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this research is to evaluate the escalating sequence of behavior that culminates in severe problem behavior (SPB, such as aggression, self-injury, and disruption). To do so, we will investigate the precursors of SPB, which are defined as behaviors that are not as severe or dangerous as SPB, but that reliably precede the occurrence of SPB. Identifying and knowing about these precursors has the potential to complement existing behavioral treatments, making treatments safer (because SPB may occur to a lesser extent or not at all). However, existing research on precursors has been opportunistic and lacks systematic study. This research will examine methods to identify and better understand precursors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective of this research is to evaluate the escalating sequence of behavior that culminates in severe problem behavior (SPB, such as aggression, self-injury, and disruption). To do so, the investigators will investigate the precursors of SPB, which are defined as behaviors that are not as severe or dangerous as SPB, but that reliably precede the occurrence of SPB. Identifying and knowing about these precursors has the potential to complement existing behavioral treatments, making treatments safer (because SPB may occur to a lesser extent or not at all). However, existing research on precursors has been opportunistic and lacks systematic study. This research will examine methods to identify and better understand precursors.

In Aim 1, researchers will conduct second-by-second review of videos when participants engage in SPB and identify behaviors that reliably precede SPB. The research team will then conduct quantitative analysis of these behaviors that precede SPB to identify likely precursors. In doing so, researchers will also identify the environmental factors that give rise to and maintain SPB (the reinforcer).

In Aim 2, the investigators will experimentally confirm that the likely precursors identified in Aim 1 are precursors to SPB by examining how both behaviors change across two different conditions that researchers arrange for the participants to experience. First, investigators will examine these behaviors in a contingent reinforcement condition, in which the investigators provide reinforcer for each instance of the precursor. Second, researchers will examine these behavior, in a noncontingent reinforcement condition, in which the researchers provide the reinforcer on a time based schedule. A behavior will be identified as a precursor if it occurs only in the same context as SPB (i.e., the contingent reinforcement condition) and not in other conditions (i.e., the noncontingent reinforcement condition).

AIM 3: The research team will identify whether the precursor is a member of a response class (two behaviors that have same goal) or whether the precursor is part of a behavioral chain (a sequence of behaviors where each is required before the next can occur) culminating in SPB by examining how SPB changes when investigators block the occurrence of the precursor (i.e., physically prevent the precursor from occurring) but provide the reinforce for SPB. If SPB occurs when the precursor is blocked, researchers conclude the precursor is part of a response class. If the SPB does not occur when the precursor is blocked, the investigators will conclude the precursor is part of a response chain.

Each recruited individual will participate in Aim 1. Based on our pilot data and the published literature, the researchers hypothesize that approximately 80% of individuals will have a behavior that occurs frequently before SPB, relative to how often this behavior occurs in general. Based on pilot data and published literature, the researchers hypothesize these likely precursors will be verified to be a precursor to SPB 80% of the time in Aim 2. For all individuals where a precursor verified in Aim 2, investigators will block the occurrence of this behavior (physically prevent this behavior from occurring) and assess the effects on SPB.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Problem Behavior Aggression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A consecutive controlled case series design will be used across the three proposed studies. In this design, all individuals who meet the inclusion criteria will experience the procedures described in that study.

Across studies, within-subject experimental designs with repeated measures will be used to examine the effects of the independent variables (environmental conditions) on the dependent variables (responding). Within-subject experimental designs are well suited for this type of research because the individual's SPB is used as his or her own control. Well-validated structural criteria will be employed (Hagopian et al., 1997; Roane et al., 2013) in these studies to determine when a series of conditions has a sufficient sample of behavior. The Study Team members have published numerous treatment evaluations employing this methodology (see Hagopian et al., 2011; Rooker et al., 2013).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Precursors as Response Chain or Class

The precursor behavior occurs as a part of a sequence, or for the same maintaining variable, leading up to the severe problem behavior.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Response Blocking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Physically preventing the response (i.e., precursor) from occurring.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Response Blocking

Physically preventing the response (i.e., precursor) from occurring.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged 6 -17
* Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities
* Individuals who engage in severe problem behavior (e.g., aggression or self injury)
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Griffin Rooker

Research Scientist, Department of Behavioral Psychology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Griffin W Rooker, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kennedy Krieger Institute

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hagopian LP, Rooker GW, Rolider NU. Identifying empirically supported treatments for pica in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.042. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21862281 (View on PubMed)

Hagopian LP, Fisher WW, Thompson RH, Owen-DeSchryver J, Iwata BA, Wacker DP. Toward the development of structured criteria for interpretation of functional analysis data. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):313-25; quiz 326. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-313.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9210309 (View on PubMed)

Rooker GW, Jessel J, Kurtz PF, Hagopian LP. Functional communication training with and without alternative reinforcement and punishment: an analysis of 58 applications. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Dec;46(4):708-22. doi: 10.1002/jaba.76. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24114463 (View on PubMed)

Roane HS, Fisher WW, Kelley ME, Mevers JL, Bouxsein KJ. Using modified visual-inspection criteria to interpret functional analysis outcomes. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Spring;46(1):130-46. doi: 10.1002/jaba.13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24114090 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00210315

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Extensions of Resurgence as Choice
NCT05537610 RECRUITING NA