Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-07
2021-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Crisis Prevention Program for Youth With Autism
NCT05681143
Basic and Applied Research on Extinction Bursts
NCT05925101
Treatment for Men Who Are Abusive to Their Partners
NCT00070863
A Single-Arm Pilot Trial for Mitigating Relapse of Severe Problem Behavior
NCT06732219
The Added Value of an Internet-based Intervention for Treatment of Forensic Psychiatric Outpatients
NCT05711342
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In Aim 1, researchers will conduct second-by-second review of videos when participants engage in SPB and identify behaviors that reliably precede SPB. The research team will then conduct quantitative analysis of these behaviors that precede SPB to identify likely precursors. In doing so, researchers will also identify the environmental factors that give rise to and maintain SPB (the reinforcer).
In Aim 2, the investigators will experimentally confirm that the likely precursors identified in Aim 1 are precursors to SPB by examining how both behaviors change across two different conditions that researchers arrange for the participants to experience. First, investigators will examine these behaviors in a contingent reinforcement condition, in which the investigators provide reinforcer for each instance of the precursor. Second, researchers will examine these behavior, in a noncontingent reinforcement condition, in which the researchers provide the reinforcer on a time based schedule. A behavior will be identified as a precursor if it occurs only in the same context as SPB (i.e., the contingent reinforcement condition) and not in other conditions (i.e., the noncontingent reinforcement condition).
AIM 3: The research team will identify whether the precursor is a member of a response class (two behaviors that have same goal) or whether the precursor is part of a behavioral chain (a sequence of behaviors where each is required before the next can occur) culminating in SPB by examining how SPB changes when investigators block the occurrence of the precursor (i.e., physically prevent the precursor from occurring) but provide the reinforce for SPB. If SPB occurs when the precursor is blocked, researchers conclude the precursor is part of a response class. If the SPB does not occur when the precursor is blocked, the investigators will conclude the precursor is part of a response chain.
Each recruited individual will participate in Aim 1. Based on our pilot data and the published literature, the researchers hypothesize that approximately 80% of individuals will have a behavior that occurs frequently before SPB, relative to how often this behavior occurs in general. Based on pilot data and published literature, the researchers hypothesize these likely precursors will be verified to be a precursor to SPB 80% of the time in Aim 2. For all individuals where a precursor verified in Aim 2, investigators will block the occurrence of this behavior (physically prevent this behavior from occurring) and assess the effects on SPB.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
Across studies, within-subject experimental designs with repeated measures will be used to examine the effects of the independent variables (environmental conditions) on the dependent variables (responding). Within-subject experimental designs are well suited for this type of research because the individual's SPB is used as his or her own control. Well-validated structural criteria will be employed (Hagopian et al., 1997; Roane et al., 2013) in these studies to determine when a series of conditions has a sufficient sample of behavior. The Study Team members have published numerous treatment evaluations employing this methodology (see Hagopian et al., 2011; Rooker et al., 2013).
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Precursors as Response Chain or Class
The precursor behavior occurs as a part of a sequence, or for the same maintaining variable, leading up to the severe problem behavior.
Response Blocking
Physically preventing the response (i.e., precursor) from occurring.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Response Blocking
Physically preventing the response (i.e., precursor) from occurring.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities
* Individuals who engage in severe problem behavior (e.g., aggression or self injury)
6 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Griffin Rooker
Research Scientist, Department of Behavioral Psychology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Griffin W Rooker, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kennedy Krieger Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hagopian LP, Rooker GW, Rolider NU. Identifying empirically supported treatments for pica in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.042. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
Hagopian LP, Fisher WW, Thompson RH, Owen-DeSchryver J, Iwata BA, Wacker DP. Toward the development of structured criteria for interpretation of functional analysis data. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):313-25; quiz 326. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-313.
Rooker GW, Jessel J, Kurtz PF, Hagopian LP. Functional communication training with and without alternative reinforcement and punishment: an analysis of 58 applications. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Dec;46(4):708-22. doi: 10.1002/jaba.76. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
Roane HS, Fisher WW, Kelley ME, Mevers JL, Bouxsein KJ. Using modified visual-inspection criteria to interpret functional analysis outcomes. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Spring;46(1):130-46. doi: 10.1002/jaba.13.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00210315
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.