Decision-making - the Benefit of Bedside CRP Within Ambulance Care

NCT ID: NCT04097210

Last Updated: 2022-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with degreased (DGC) for ambiguous reasons receive low triage priority. Their death risk is triple. Tools are needed to identify the critically ill patients from this group. The triage used today is not effective. The bedside point-of-care measurements are CRP, lactate acid and suPAR (Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor). Elevated values associate with the probability of critical illness and predict a risk of death.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose: To improve identification and proper prioritization of patients with non-specific symptoms prehospitally, we intend to investigate whether Q-CRP, a rapid test for CRP, correlates with time-critical states in the above-mentioned patient group alone or together with CRP, lactate and suPAR. The primary endpoint is need for hospital care.

Material: Patients over 18 years who exhibit non-specific symptoms and transported to the emergency room.

Method: In patients with unspecified conditions, defined according to the inclusion template, a venous blood sample was taken prehospitally at the scene by the EMS.

Analysis: Significance tests and regression analyzes with 95% CI were used. The diagnostic accuracy of Q-CRP, lactate, suPAR and combinations thereof were compared with optimal boundary values.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

POC

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 18 years who exhibit non-specific symptoms and transported to the emergency room.

Exclusion Criteria

* Abnormal vitals
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

104 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marja Mäkinen

PhD, principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maaret Castrén, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Johanna Kaartinen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HUS 329/13/3/02/2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.