A Modified Muscle Sparing Posterior Technique (SPAIRE) in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Fractures.

NCT ID: NCT04095611

Last Updated: 2024-01-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

244 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-25

Study Completion Date

2022-08-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Which technique is best for partial hip replacement?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim of study: To compare two ways of performing partial hip replacement to see which one allows patients to mobilise better and gives patients improved function after surgery. The best approach is more likely to allow patients to maintain their independence and return to their own homes after their injury.

Background: When someone breaks their hip they often need a partial hip replacement, also known as hemiarthroplasty. To perform this operation surgeons need to cut through some muscles to expose the hip joint and perform the partial replacement. Currently, clinical guidelines suggest that this operation should be performed using a technique which involves cutting muscles and tendons from the side of the hip. This is called the lateral approach. Alternatively, a newer, modified technique can be used leaving all the major muscles intact and this may cause fewer problems for the patient. There is no research evidence to prove which approach is more beneficial. Patients and carers looking for information about this are likely to become confused by the many opinions of surgeons speaking about preferred techniques. It is therefore important to find out which technique is better for patients, based on research rather than opinion.

Study design: We will randomly allocate patients who agree to be part of the study to have one of the two techniques to partial hip replacement. We can then compare the impact of the two techniques on how well and fully patients mobilise, the level of pain they experience, and the safety of the techniques. We will also contact a number of patients from both treatment groups to discuss their experience of the surgery in more detail.

Patient and public involvement: This study was inspired by patients who said that mobility and speed to regaining independence are the most important outcomes after surgery. Patients and carers will continue to be involved throughout this study, to ensure that the study results are relevant and important to people at risk of breaking their hip.

Dissemination: We will publish the results of this study widely in scientific and other publications accessable to patients and all involved in the treatment of patients with hip fractures. We will work with surgeons, carers and patients to ensure all appropriate networks are aware of the results and that the outcomes are disseminated in an accessible way so that practices can be changed based on the results of this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The surgeon performing the operation will be aware which treatment the participant is receiving.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SPAIRE

hemiarthroplasty surgery, the muscle-sparing modification of the posterior approach (SPAIRE).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SPAIRE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

To perform the hip surgery called hemiarthroplasty surgeons need to cut through some muscles to expose the hip joint and perform the partial replacement. Currently this often performed using a technique which involves cutting muscles and tendons from the side of the hip and this is called the lateral approach. SPAIRE is a modified technique that accesses the surgical area through a different route.

LATERAL

hemiarthroplasty surgery, the standard lateral approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LATERAL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgery in adults with a displaced intracapsular hip fracture requiring hemiarthroplasty, the standard lateral approach.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SPAIRE

To perform the hip surgery called hemiarthroplasty surgeons need to cut through some muscles to expose the hip joint and perform the partial replacement. Currently this often performed using a technique which involves cutting muscles and tendons from the side of the hip and this is called the lateral approach. SPAIRE is a modified technique that accesses the surgical area through a different route.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LATERAL

surgery in adults with a displaced intracapsular hip fracture requiring hemiarthroplasty, the standard lateral approach.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patients aged 60+ presenting with an intracapsular hip fractures requiring cemented hip hemiarthroplasty (NICE CG124 2011), and who are resident in the South West of England

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients that were immobile (unable to walk) before the hip fracture occurred.
* Patients that are not expected to live until post operative day 120 due to chronic illness and are receiving surgery for palliative care.
* Use of femoral stems that are not of a proven stem design, in line with the recommendations set by the NICE clinical guideline on hip fracture management (NICE CG124 2011).
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Exeter

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Charity, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust

Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Price A, Ball S, Rhodes S, Wickins R, Gordon E, Aylward A, Cockcroft E, Morgan-Trimmer S, Powell R, Timperley J, Charity J. Effects of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures on postoperative function compared to a standard lateral approach (HemiSPAIRE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 8;11(6):e045652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045652.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34103316 (View on PubMed)

Ball S, McAndrew A, Aylward A, Cockcroft E, Gordon E, Kerridge A, Morgan-Trimmer S, Powell R, Price A, Rhodes S, Timperley AJ, van Horik J, Wickins R, Charity J. Detailed statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial of the effects of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique (SPAIRE) in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures on post-operative function compared to a standard lateral approach: HemiSPAIRE. Trials. 2022 Nov 5;23(1):924. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06790-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36335403 (View on PubMed)

Ball S, Aylward A, Cockcroft E, Corr A, Gordon E, Kerridge A, McAndrew A, Morgan-Trimmer S, Powell R, Price A, Rhodes S, Timperley AJ, van Horik J, Wickins R, Charity J. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2024 Jun 17;6(1):e000251. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000251. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38895600 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRAS: 258327

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.