Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach to the Fractured Hip Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT01486641

Last Updated: 2017-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the anterolateral in comparison to posterolateral approach to the hip arthroplasty gives an equal or better clinical results.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to compare the anterolateral- to posterolateral approaches in patients suffering a displaced femoral neck fracture operated with an hip arthroplasty. Our hypothesis is that the anterolateral approach gives equal or better clinical function, health related quality of life and less complication and reoperations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Femoral Neck Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anterolateral approach

Patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture operated through the anterolateral approach to the hip arthroplasty.

Lubinus total hip arthroplasty or varikopf hemiarthroplasty.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Anterolateral approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anterolateral approach acording to Gammer for hip arthroplasty.

Posterolateral approach

Patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture operated through the posterolateral approach to the hip arthroplasty.

Lubinus total hip arthroplasty or varikopf hemiarthroplasty.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anterolateral approach

Anterolateral approach acording to Gammer for hip arthroplasty.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Anterolateral approach according to Gammer. Lubinus total hip arthroplasty or varikopf hemiarthroplasty.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 65 years
* Displaced femoral neck fracture

Exclusion Criteria

* Pathologic fracture
* Not Swedish speaker
* Not living in Västernorrlands county
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sundsvall Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arkan S Sayed-Noor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Umeå University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sundsvall Hospital

Sundsvall, Västernorrland County, Sweden

Site Status

Department of orthopedic surgery Sundsvall Hospital

Sundsvall, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Apr;(385):95-9. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200104000-00016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11302333 (View on PubMed)

Gore DR, Murray MP, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 May;(165):180-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7075057 (View on PubMed)

Skoldenberg O, Ekman A, Salemyr M, Boden H. Reduced dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures when changing from posterolateral to anterolateral approach. Acta Orthop. 2010 Oct;81(5):583-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.519170.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20860452 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sebastian-12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.