Comparison of a Cemented, Polished Tapered Stem and an Anatomic Stem for Femoral Neck Fracture
NCT ID: NCT02591342
Last Updated: 2016-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1014 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-09-30
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hip Fractures Treated With Uncemented Arthroplasties
NCT01798472
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Uncemented Versus Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
NCT00491673
Feasibility of Implantation of Cemented Femoral Stem for Osteoporotic Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly Patients
NCT02901938
Cemented Hemiarthroplasty Versus Uncemented Furlong Hemiarthroplasty
NCT02998034
Direct Anterior vs. Anterolateral Approach for Hip Arthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture in the Senior Population
NCT02959320
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CPT stem
Patients treated with a polished, tapered femoral stem as a hip arthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture
No interventions assigned to this group
SP2 stem
Patients treated with a anatomic femoral stem as a hip arthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Treated with a primary hip arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sundsvall Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sebastian Mukka, M.D, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Umeå University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Broden C, Mukka S, Muren O, Eisler T, Boden H, Stark A, Skoldenberg O. High risk of early periprosthetic fractures after primary hip arthroplasty in elderly patients using a cemented, tapered, polished stem. Acta Orthop. 2015 Apr;86(2):169-74. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.971388. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
Inngul C, Enocson A. Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome. Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1683-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2570-0. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Makela K, Overgaard S, Pedersen A, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Karrholm J. Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the nordic arthroplasty register association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 1;96(19):e167. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00643.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SM_IV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.