Cardiac Risk Assessment Using Standard of Care Versus CTA and Heart Flow FFRct
NCT ID: NCT04089969
Last Updated: 2023-03-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-30
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by CTA Flow Encoding
NCT02286401
3T MR Angiography of the Hepatic Vasculature
NCT02299934
Comparison of Gated Blood-pool SPECT and Echocardiogram for Ventricular Function
NCT02644850
Evaluate the Effectiveness and Cost of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Non-invasive Evaluation of Lesions Discovered on Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA)
NCT00538460
Diagnostic Accuracy of CCTA-derived Versus AngiogRaphy-dErived QuantitativE Flow Ratio (CAREER) Study
NCT04665817
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All 100 patients will undergo standard of care stress test plus CTA/FFRct. The referring cardiologist will be blinded to the results of CTA/FFRct, and will make an "initial" recommendation based on the standard of care evaluation. After making the "initial" recommendation, the referring cardiologist will be unblinded to the CTA/FFRct results and make a "final" recommendation. The "initial" recommendation will consist of one of the following: further cardiac evaluation is not needed or cardiac catheterization is required. The "final" recommendation will consist of one of the following: further cardiac evaluation is not needed or cardiac catheterization is required. All patients will receive a 1 year phone follow up call.
The hypothesis is that in End Stage Liver Disease (ESLD) patients, non-invasive assessment for CAD using CTA/FFRct is superior to SOC cardiovascular evaluation (stress etst, echocardiogram, ECG). This study will look at the frequency of how often CTA/FFRct changed the clinical recommendation compared with the standard of care alone (Initial recommendation versus final recommendation).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Evaluation of Standard of care followed by CTA/FFRct
Patient received clinical recommendation based on the Standard of Care i.e 2 D echocardiogram, plus ECG, plus, pharmacological stress test followed by re-evaluation of clinical recommendation with addition of CTA/FFRct
CTA/FFRct
Computed Tomography Angiogram with Fractional Flow Reserve. A Ct scan of the heart's blood vessels.
SOC cardiovascular evaluation
Standard of care (SOC) cardiovascular evaluation i.e ECG, 2 D echocardiogram and pharmacologic stress test such as Dobutamine and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging stress test.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CTA/FFRct
Computed Tomography Angiogram with Fractional Flow Reserve. A Ct scan of the heart's blood vessels.
SOC cardiovascular evaluation
Standard of care (SOC) cardiovascular evaluation i.e ECG, 2 D echocardiogram and pharmacologic stress test such as Dobutamine and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging stress test.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients undergoing cardiovascular risk assessment prior to liver transplantation -
Exclusion Criteria
2. Heart rate \> 90 bpm despite beta blocker therapy
3. Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 plus chest obesity (i.e. truncal obesity and normal chest morphology is not an exclusion)
4. Pregnant Women
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
William Beaumont Hospitals
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robert Safian
MD.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Safian, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
William Beaumont Hospitals
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-151
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.