Automated Oxygen Control by O2matic to Patients Admitted With Acute Hypoxemia
NCT ID: NCT04079465
Last Updated: 2024-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Automatic Oxygen Titration With O2matic® to Patients Admitted With COVID-19 and Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
NCT04565106
Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen Using an Autonomous Oxygen Titration Intervention
NCT06374225
NeO2Matic-Pilot Trial
NCT05629910
Home Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Treatment for COPD-patients After a NIV-treated Exacerbation
NCT01513655
The Effect of Oxygen Therapy With Airvo High-flow Heated Humidification
NCT02731872
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All studies on closed-loop systems have shown that this method is better than manually control by nurse to maintain saturation within the desired interval. Furthermore, some studies have indicated that closed-loop has the possibility to reduce admission time and to reduce time spent with oxygen therapy, due to more efficient and faster withdrawal from oxygen supplementation.
In the present study O2matic will be tested versus manual control, for patients admitted to the emergency department with acute hypoxemia due to any reason, except for carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning and other conditions where SpO2 is not a reliable measure of hypoxemia. During the study the patients will either have oxygen controlled with O2matic or manually by nursing staff for 24 hours or until discharge or weaning from oxygen supply. All patients will have continuous logging of pulse rate, oxygen-saturation and oxygen-flow with O2matic, but only in the O2matic active group, the algorithm will control oxygen-delivery.
The primary hypothesis is that O2matic compared to manual control allows for faster weaning from oxygen supplementation, and that more patients will be weaned from oxygen supplementation within a time frame of 24 hours. Furthermore it will be tested if O2matic compared to manual control allows for earlier hospital discharge. It will be tested if O2matic is better than manual control in maintaining oxygen-saturation within the desired interval and reducing time with unintended hypoxia and hyperoxia.
No safety issues has been reported in the literature. O2matic is approved in Europe with "Conformité Européenne" (CE) mark, and approved for clinical testing by The Danish Medicines Agency, The Ethics Committee in the Capital Region of Denmark and by the regional Data Protection Board. The study will be conducted according to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards with independent monitoring. All adverse events and serious adverse events will be monitored and serious adverse events will be reported to Danish Medicines Agency.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
O2matic
Usual care plus O2matic controlled oxygen therapy for a maximum of 24 hours or until weaning from oxygen supplementation
O2matic
O2matic controls oxygen supply with a closed-loop feedback from a pulse oximeter. The aim is to maintain SpO2 within a predefined target interval according to guidelines for the specific condition causing hypoxemia, with the lowest possible supplementation of oxygen.
Manual
Usual care plus manual controlled oxygen therapy by nursing staff. O2matic is used in monitoring mode to measure SpO2 continuously.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
O2matic
O2matic controls oxygen supply with a closed-loop feedback from a pulse oximeter. The aim is to maintain SpO2 within a predefined target interval according to guidelines for the specific condition causing hypoxemia, with the lowest possible supplementation of oxygen.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \>= 18 years
* Expected duration of admission \> 24 hours
* Need for oxygen supplementation to maintain SpO2 \>= 88 % (patients at risk of hypercapnia) or SpO2 \>= 94 % (other patients)
* Cognitively able to participate in the study
* Willing to participate and give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with CO-poisoning or other condition with unreliable SpO2.
* Patients in need of oxygen supplementation at more than 10 liters/min
* Pregnancy
* Cognitive or language barriers for participation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Innovation Fund Denmark
INDIV
Hvidovre University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ejvind Frausing Hansen
Senior Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ove Andersen, DMSc
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hvidovre University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amager Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Hvidovre Hospital
Hvidovre, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Earis J, Mak V. British Thoracic Society Guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 May 15;4(1):e000170. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000170. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.
Cornet AD, Kooter AJ, Peters MJ, Smulders YM. The potential harm of oxygen therapy in medical emergencies. Crit Care. 2013 Apr 18;17(2):313. doi: 10.1186/cc12554.
Chu DK, Kim LH, Young PJ, Zamiri N, Almenawer SA, Jaeschke R, Szczeklik W, Schunemann HJ, Neary JD, Alhazzani W. Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1693-1705. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30479-3. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
Hansen EF, Hove JD, Bech CS, Jensen JS, Kallemose T, Vestbo J. Automated oxygen control with O2matic(R) during admission with exacerbation of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 14;13:3997-4003. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S183762. eCollection 2018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
O2MATIC-ACUTE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.