Standardising Nasal Allergen Challenge in Adult With Hay Fever
NCT ID: NCT04078009
Last Updated: 2021-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-26
2020-08-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Controlled exposures to allergens such as grass pollen can provide important information on the mechanisms of allergic inflammation and may be used to assess the success of anti-allergy treatments.
Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is a useful tool in the investigation of allergic rhinitis, including grass pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis (hay fever). NAC is performed by installation of a very small amount of grass pollen extract into the nose in order to reproduce mild and short-lived symptoms such as nasal itch, sneezing, runny nose and nasal congestion that you experience in a more severe form during natural exposure to grass pollen during the summer. Nasal allergen challenge has allowed us to explore the mechanism of hay fever and to provide a rapid and reliable method for investigating new potential treatments for hay fever.
Nasal allergen Challenge is a very well-standardised and safe procedure that has been performed within the department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology at Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital for many years.
Unfortunately the grass pollen extract ('Aquagen') that we have routinely used for nasal challenge has been discontinued and is therefore no longer available. The present study involves testing an alternative source of the grass pollen extract in the form of 'Grazax' which is a freeze-dried tablet that is highly standardised and should enable us to give an identical amount of grass pollen extract for the purpose of nasal challenge. We plan a 'head-to-head' comparison of the two extracts in nasal challenge in order to confirm that the two sources of allergen are equivalent thereby enabling us to use Grazax as the source of grass pollen extract for our nasal challenge studies in the future.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Repeat Nasal Allergen Challenge
NCT00290368
Grass Pollen Allergen Immunotherapy Tablet (AIT) Time Course Study
NCT02005627
Tolerability of Grazax in Patients With Hayfever in Real Life Settings
NCT01433510
Allergic Inflammation in Rhinitis Patients Following Nasal Allergen Challenge
NCT01657097
Grass Pollen Immunotherapy Using a Cluster Regime for Seasonal Rhinitis and Asthma
NCT00135642
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Aquagen (Starts with Aquagen and finish with Grazax)
In order to explore a possible order effect with the challenges, in this single group cross-over trial, participants will be randomised (by computer-generated randomisation) to receive either Aquagen or Grazax as the first challenge, followed by the other allergen extract at the second challenge a minimum of 4 weeks later.
Aquagen
To compare the clinical allergic response after direct installation of an aqueous solution of Aquagen Timothy Grass pollen extract via nasal allergen challenge with the clinical allergic response after direct installation of an aqueous solution of Grazax Timothy Grass lyophilisate tablets via nasal allergen challenge in grass pollen allergic individuals.
Grazax (Starts with Grazax and finish with Aquagen)
In order to explore a possible order effect with the challenges, in this single group cross-over trial, participants will be randomised (by computer-generated randomisation) to receive either Aquagen or Grazax as the first challenge, followed by the other allergen extract at the second challenge a minimum of 4 weeks later.
Grazax
To compare the clinical allergic response after direct installation of an aqueous solution of Aquagen Timothy Grass pollen extract via nasal allergen challenge with the clinical allergic response after direct installation of an aqueous solution of Grazax Timothy Grass lyophilisate tablets via nasal allergen challenge in grass pollen allergic individuals.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Aquagen
To compare the clinical allergic response after direct installation of an aqueous solution of Aquagen Timothy Grass pollen extract via nasal allergen challenge with the clinical allergic response after direct installation of an aqueous solution of Grazax Timothy Grass lyophilisate tablets via nasal allergen challenge in grass pollen allergic individuals.
Grazax
To compare the clinical allergic response after direct installation of an aqueous solution of Aquagen Timothy Grass pollen extract via nasal allergen challenge with the clinical allergic response after direct installation of an aqueous solution of Grazax Timothy Grass lyophilisate tablets via nasal allergen challenge in grass pollen allergic individuals.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. A clinical history of moderate-severe grass pollen-induced allergic rhino conjunctivitis for at least 2 years with peak symptoms from mid-May to mid-July.
3. Positive skin prick test response, defined as wheal diameter ≥ 5 mm, to timothy grass pollen.
4. For women of childbearing age, a negative urine pregnancy test at the time of screening and willingness to use an effective form of contraception for the duration of involvement in the study.
5. The ability to give informed consent and comply with study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 \< 70% of predicted value at screening.
3. A clinical history of symptomatic allergic rhinitis and/or asthma caused by an allergen other than grass pollen to which the participant is regularly exposed either seasonally (eg. tree pollen, weed pollen and moulds) or perennially (house dust mite, cat, dog dander).
4. Perennial asthma requiring regular inhaled corticosteroids.
5. History of emergency visit or hospital admission for asthma in the previous 12 months.
6. History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
7. History of significant recurrent acute sinusitis, defined as 2 episodes per year for the last 2 years, all of which required antibiotic treatment.
8. History of chronic sinusitis, defined as sinus symptoms lasting greater than 12 weeks that includes 2 or more major factors or 1 major factor and 2 minor factors. Major factors are defined as facial pain or pressure, nasal obstruction or blockage, nasal discharge or purulence or discolored postnasal discharge, purulence in nasal cavity, or impaired or loss of smell. Minor factors are defined as headache, fever, halitosis, fatigue, dental pain, cough, ear pain, pressure, or fullness.
9. At screening visit, current symptoms of, or treatment for, upper respiratory tract infection, acute sinusitis, acute otitis media, or other relevant infectious process; serous otitis media is not an exclusion criterion. Participants may be re-evaluated for eligibility after symptoms resolve.
10. History of life-threatening anaphylaxis or angioedema.
11. Ongoing systemic immunosuppressive treatment.
12. The use of any investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit.
13. The presence of any medical condition that the investigator deems incompatible with participation in the study.
14. History of fish allergy with positive skin test and/or positive specific IgE test to vertebrate/finned fish (due to potential fish allergen exposure from fish-gelatin in Grazax).
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prof Stephen Durham, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Imperial College London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Brompton Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19IC5338
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.