Family Physician Contract Services and Impacts in China Based on Physician Agency Theory

NCT ID: NCT04073732

Last Updated: 2020-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

682 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-15

Study Completion Date

2019-11-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In June 2016, the Health Reform Office in the State Council released "the Announcement about Guiding Opinions of Promoting Family Physician Contract Services". Family Physician Contract Service is an important tool to change the health service models in primary care organizations in China. The relationship between patients and physicians can be regarded as principles and agents.

Physician agency theory has been used to study physician behaviors in economics and management. Family physician contract services regulate the principle-agent relationship between patients and physicians using a formal contract, and there are lots of potentials to employ the physician agency theory to study family physician contract services in China. In theoretical aspects, the present project will study the analysis frameworks and methods of family physician contract services in China under the capitation and global budget payment mechanisms after systematically reviewing Chinese and English literatures about the physician agency theory. In empirical aspects, the present project will collect data from family physician contract services and examine the effects of specific contract forms, incentives, and fees on family physician behaviors and their impacts on health status and medical expenditures of hypertensive and diabetic patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. From a theoretical point of view, using the physician agency theory to construct a family physician contract services and a family physician (team) behavior theory analysis framework and research method system suitable for China's national conditions.
2. From the empirical point of view, from the demand side, analyze the needs of the family physician contract service, the status quo, and the behavior of the visit; from the supplier, understand the behavior changes and satisfaction of the family physician (team) after the implementation of the family physician contract service Degree situation
3. From an empirical perspective, from the level of primary medical institutions, use the sample area data to analyze the impact of family physicians' signing services on the number of visits and medical expenses;
4. From an empirical perspective, using the constructed theoretical analysis framework to analyze the implementation of the Chinese family physician contract service, including incentive mechanism (income, incentive performance salary and contract service fee), family physician team composition, family bed service, etc. The impact, especially on the quality and quantity of services.
5. From the empirical point of view, taking the key monitoring population (hypertension patients as an example) as a sample, further study the family physicians' contractual services, the changes in the practice behavior of family physicians to the key monitoring population (hypertension, diabetes patients), health outcomes, medical expenses The effect is to propose policy recommendations for family physicians' contracting services and physicians' behavior in the new medical reform in the future.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physician Behavior Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

family physician team

Family physician team in four regions (Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou and Xia'men), including general practitioners, nurses and public health personnel.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Family physician

1. a family doctor (general practitioner), has a formal medical license, does not retire;
2. must be directly facing the patient, participate in the patient's diagnosis, prescription, treatment and return visits, with the outpatient service as the main treatment;
3. family doctors average weekly Must receive at least 20 patients and receive an average of no less than 2 days per week;
4. Signing informed consent.
* Residents 1) Can complete the questionnaire independently; 2)Oral participation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Family physician Not signing informed consent
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Natural Science Foundation of China

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hai Fang

Principal Investigator,Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shanghai Chiangning District health commission

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Frolich A, Talavera JA, Broadhead P, Dudley RA. A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality. Health Policy. 2007 Jan;80(1):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16624440 (View on PubMed)

Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. 1963. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Feb;82(2):141-9. Epub 2004 Mar 16. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15042238 (View on PubMed)

Fang H, Liu H, Rizzo JA. Has the use of physician gatekeepers declined among HMOs? Evidence from the United States. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009 Jun;9(2):183-95. doi: 10.1007/s10754-009-9060-8. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19357948 (View on PubMed)

Fang H, Rizzo JA. Managed care and physicians' perceptions of drug formulary use. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jun;15(6):395-400.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19514805 (View on PubMed)

Wilson DM, Taylor DW, Gilbert JR, Best JA, Lindsay EA, Willms DG, Singer J. A randomized trial of a family physician intervention for smoking cessation. JAMA. 1988 Sep 16;260(11):1570-4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 3411737 (View on PubMed)

Avery DM Jr, Hooper DE, McDonald JT Jr, Love MW, Tucker MT, Parton JM. The economic impact of rural family physicians practicing obstetrics. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;27(5):602-10. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.05.140052.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25201930 (View on PubMed)

Yip WC, Hsiao W, Meng Q, Chen W, Sun X. Realignment of incentives for health-care providers in China. Lancet. 2010 Mar 27;375(9720):1120-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60063-3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20346818 (View on PubMed)

Conrad DA. The Theory of Value-Based Payment Incentives and Their Application to Health Care. Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2057-89. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12408. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26549041 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

71774006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.