Implementation of a Population Health Chronic Disease Management Program

NCT ID: NCT02812303

Last Updated: 2016-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

108000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A pilot program was created by the network's primary care leadership team at Massachusetts General Hospital. A population health management program was implemented for chronic disease management. The investigators evaluated quality of care process and outcome measures over the first six months of the program and compared practices assigned a central population health coordinator to those not assigned this support.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A pilot program was created by the network's primary care leadership team at Massachusetts General Hospital. They hired and allocated 4 population health coordinators (PHCs) as part of a pilot project to centralize population health management efforts to improve quality of care for chronic disease management. The network did not have sufficient resources to implement a PHC in all of the 18 network practices. So the program's team invited practice leaders to participate and the PHCs were allocated by program's leadership team based on a variety of factors including responses from the practice leader, baseline quality scores, size of the practice, nature of the practice (health center vs not), and location of the practice (on campus or community based). These decisions were made in a way that sought to equitably distribute available PHC resources within the practice network as a way to get network buy-in and maximize the impact of the program, both for practices with and without PHCs. In this study, the investigators evaluated quality of care process and outcome measures over the first six months of the chronic disease management program. The investigators hypothesized that practices assigned a central PHC would have greater performance increases in quality measures compared to practices that were not assigned a PHC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus Cardiovascular Diseases Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Population Health Coordinator Support

8 practices received the support of central population health coordinators (PHCs). PHCs utilized a population health management (PHM) information technology (IT) tool and performed administrative tasks including appointment scheduling, ordering overdue laboratory testing, chart reviews, and obtaining outside tests/labs. In addition, PHCs regularly met with physicians to review those patients who required clinical intervention to develop an action plan.

The network did not have sufficient resources to implement a PHC in all of the 18 network practices. So PHCs were allocated by responses from the practice leader, baseline quality scores, size of the practice, nature of the practice (health center vs not), and location of the practice. These decisions were made in a way that sought to equitably distribute available PHC resources within the practice network as a way to get network buy-in and maximize the impact of the program, both for practices with and without PHCs.

Centralized support for population health management activities

Intervention Type OTHER

No Population Health Coordinator Support

Ten practices without PHC support were provided training on how to use the PHM IT tool. The staff in these practices remained primarily responsible for managing administrative tasks.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Centralized support for population health management activities

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2), or cardiovascular disease (including coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease), or hypertension
* Breast cancer: women 50-74 years of age
* Cervical cancer: women 21-64 years of age
* Colorectal cancer: men or women 52-75 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients not connected with a specific network physician or practice
* Patients who switched between PHC and non-PHC practices during the follow-up period
* Breast: bilateral mastectomy
* Cervical: total hysterectomy Colorectal: total colectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Steven Atlas

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven J Atlas, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

James A, Berkowitz SA, Ashburner JM, Chang Y, Horn DM, O'Keefe SM, Atlas SJ. Impact of a Population Health Management Intervention on Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Control. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):463-470. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4227-3. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29313223 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009P002079

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Building Connections
NCT07091032 RECRUITING NA