Enhanced Housing Photoscreeners 2WIN and GoCheckKids Compared in Burma and Alaska
NCT ID: NCT04068129
Last Updated: 2020-10-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
162 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-02-11
2019-04-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hyperopia Detection GCK With Glow Fixation
NCT04297969
Prospective Evaluation of a Smartphone Application, GoCheckKids™, to Detect Amblyopia Risk Factors in Young Children
NCT03447171
Performance of 2WIN Photoscreener With Corneal Reflex Compared to School Bus Retinoscopy by AAPOS Guidelines
NCT03668067
Evaluation of a Smartphone Application, GoCheckKids™ as a Photo Screening Tool in a Pediatric Population
NCT03119675
Dichoptic Treatment for Amblyopia in Children 4 to 7 Years of Age
NCT06380517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Consecutive patients in a "WiFi-equipped" pediatric ophthalmology practice in Anchorage, Alaska had photoscreening before confirmatory examination.
Each patient had photoscreening with the "2WIN" photoscreener installed in the "Kaleidos" housing. In Anchorage, the devise was controled by the wireless tablet computer. In Burma, however, despite a "WiFi router" not connected to internet, the tablet computer would not connect to the 2WIN and therefore the "Kaleidos" read-trap door was opened so the 2WIN could be activated and controlled manually. The" 2WIN" stored results on an "micro-SD" memory card which was eventually downloaded to computer.
Each patient also had photoscreening with GoCheckKids (GCK) on an "iPhone 7 Plus" using the enhanced, flash-concentrating cell-phone case. In Anchorage, in addition to on-site smart-phone interpretation, images were uploaded to the central reading center for secondary interpretation. In Burma, all images were retained on the smart phone and eventually uploaded for GoCheckKids central secondary analysis after return to urban internet availability. In Burma, a portable, light-wieght tent was used to provide a dim screening environment with less distraction.
Confirmatory exams were performed consistent with 2003 and 2013 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) uniform guidelines. Cycloplegic refractions were performed 20-40 minutes after cyclopentolate 1% instillation. Visual acuity was checked with patched, surround "HOTV" at 3 meters threshold with at least 3 of 4 optotypes correct. Validation was performed with conventional 2 x 2 screen-exam matrix, and also with Alaska Blind Child Discovery (ABCD) 3 x 3 matrix including inconclusive results (no instrument interpretation or unable to gain a reading) with inconclusive interpretations considered a referral.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Burma
Patients from remote Burma clinic
photoscreen
Determine amblyopia risk factors
Alaska
Patients in pediatric ophthalmology clinic
photoscreen
Determine amblyopia risk factors
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
photoscreen
Determine amblyopia risk factors
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
6 Months
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alaska Blind Child Discovery
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert W Arnold, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Alaska Blind Child Discovery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Martin SJ, Htoo HE, Hser N, Arnold RW. Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 May 25;14:1427-1435. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S251451. eCollection 2020.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Individual Participant Data Set
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ABCD GCK Kaleidos
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.