Efficacy of Piroxicam as a Perioperative Analgesic for Patients Undergoing Fixation of Maxillofacial Fractures

NCT ID: NCT04062591

Last Updated: 2023-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-16

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

At Eldemerdash Hospital at Ain Shams University in Egypt, 72 adult patients (16 to 25 years old) who had mandibular or maxillary fractures were treated with open reduction and internal stabilization. Patients were divided into two categories. (31 patients each) Using randomly generated data from computer, the piroxicam group received 0.4 mg/kg of intramuscular piroxicam, while the general anesthesia group (GA group) did not receive piroxicam.

The overall amount of rescue analgesic dosage and postoperative complications like nausea and vomiting were therefore included in the outcomes measurement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were divided into two groups at random using a computer-generated list: the GA group received no piroxicam and the piroxicam group got a 0.4 mg/kg IM piroxicam induction. Both groups got IV paracetamol (24 mg/kg slowly administered over 20 minutes).

Fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg was administered after general anesthesia was induced and venous access was established. A suitable size endotracheal tube was then placed intranasal, and intubation was aided by Atracurium (0.5 mg/kg). Throughout the operation, 1 MAC isoflurane in a mixture of 50% air and oxygen was used to maintain anesthesia in all patients who were mechanically ventilated in pressure-controlled mode with targeted EtCO2 (30-35 mmHg). An oral pack was also introduced.

After the operation general anesthesia was stopped and the endotracheal tube was removed, Neostigmine 50 mg/kg and atropine sulfate 15 mg/kg were used to reverse muscle relaxation. Patient transportation was made to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Postoperative analgesia was evaluated by a blind investigator using 10 cm- visual analogue scale score which had been explained to the patient on the preoperative visit where: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain) in the PACU then at 3, 6, 12, 24 hours, if the pain score \>3, pethidine 25 mg intravenously and Ondansetron 0.1mg/kg was used for cases with nausea or vomiting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

piroxicam

piroxicam group who received induction with piroxicam(0.4mg/kg) IM

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Piroxicam group

Intervention Type DRUG

patients will receive 0.4 mg/kg piroxicam IM

placebo

saline IM in the same dose of piroxicam

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

saline IM in the same dose of piroxicam

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Piroxicam group

patients will receive 0.4 mg/kg piroxicam IM

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

saline IM in the same dose of piroxicam

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

piroxicam

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients aged from 16-25 years old
* ASAI II
* scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular or maxillary fractures

Exclusion Criteria

* a history of convulsion,
* gastrodudenal ulcer
* hematological disorders
* patient suffering from hepatic or renal dysfunction
* concomitant use of anticoagulants
* refusal of the patients to participate
* patients younger than 12 years
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hoda Shokri

Associate professor of Anesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nahed Effat, professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ain Shams University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain Shams U

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU R 54/ 2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.