High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects

NCT ID: NCT04055545

Last Updated: 2020-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-25

Study Completion Date

2020-03-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current guidelines for non-specific CLBP, recommend a conservative approach with exercise therapy, as first line treatment. Endurance and resistance training are two examples of recommended exercise therapies. However, it appears that none is recommended as superior over the other.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The lack of studies using HIIT in CLBP subjects, is the reason why it is needed to conduct an investigation about its effects.

However, firstly it is needed to assess the feasibility and safety of the HIIT protocol, to integrate it in the daily practise and future research.

In a single-center, single-blinded randomized feasiblity study, the investigators aim to prove the feasibility and safety of a 12 week HIIT programm.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MICT

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MICT

Intervention Type OTHER

* 5 min. warm up
* 20 min. continuous cycling: HRR btw. 40% - 59%
* 5 min. cool down

HIIT

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HIIT

Intervention Type OTHER

* 5 min. warm up
* 10 × 60 seconds burst
* 60 seconds recovery after each burst
* Burst phase: HRR \>90%
* Recovery phase: HRR btw. 30-39%
* 5 min. cool down

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HIIT

* 5 min. warm up
* 10 × 60 seconds burst
* 60 seconds recovery after each burst
* Burst phase: HRR \>90%
* Recovery phase: HRR btw. 30-39%
* 5 min. cool down

Intervention Type OTHER

MICT

* 5 min. warm up
* 20 min. continuous cycling: HRR btw. 40% - 59%
* 5 min. cool down

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

high intensity interval training moderate intensiv continuous training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Oswestry disability index (ODI) Score ≥ 14%
* Low back pain for at least 3 months.
* Declared suitable by their physician or hospital consultant to start an exercise programme and to perform a graded exercise testing to determine the heart rate peak.
* Good understanding of German or English, written and spoken.
* Age between 29 - 69
* No or stopped physical therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pre-existing unstable heart disease or suspected angina pectoris, cardiac dysrhythmias, heart failure, aneurysm or aortic stenosis.
* Known pregnancy.
* Previous low back spinal surgery in the last 2 years.
* Tumour, spinal stenosis, spinal fractures or radiculopathy.
* Comorbid health conditions like diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic inflammatory diseases.
Minimum Eligible Age

29 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Schulthess Klinik

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cerini Tamara

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cerini Tamara

Sponsor-Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Schulthess Klinik

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cerini T, Hilfiker R, Riegler TF, Felsch QTM. 12 weeks high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training in chronic low back pain subjects: a randomised single-blinded feasibility study. Arch Physiother. 2022 May 2;12(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00136-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35491417 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HIITvsMICT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.