The Approach and Avoidance Task (AAT) in Alcoholic Inpatients

NCT ID: NCT04054336

Last Updated: 2019-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-02

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The approach and avoidance task (AAT) has evolved as a promising treatment add-on in the realm of psychology. Certain psychiatric diseases, such as behavioural addictions, social anxiety disorder, and arachnophobia, are characterized by a dysfunctional tendency to either approach or avoid disease-specific objects. This tendency can be measured by means of the approach and avoidance task. In this so-called diagnostic AAT participants are instructed to react upon the format or the frame colour of a picture. For instance, pictures have to be pushed away if they are presented in landscape format and pulled towards oneself if they are presented in portrait format (or vice versa). Hence, the format (or the frame colour) becomes the task-relevant dimension, whereas the content of the picture becomes the task-irrelevant dimension. However, what generally becomes obvious in the psychiatric diseases mentioned above is that the task-irrelevant dimension (picture content) exerts an influence on reaction times. For instance, alcoholic patients are generally faster to respond if alcoholic pictures are presented in a format requiring them to pull towards themselves and slower to respond if alcoholic pictures are shown in the format requiring them to push away a joystick. This behavioural tendency has been termed an approach bias for alcohol.

In order to counteract these dysfunctional approach or avoidance tendencies, an AAT-training has been developed. In this training participants/patients learn to either avoid or approach disease-specific objects. Alcohol-dependent patients, for instance, learn to avoid alcohol-related pictures by pushing or swiping the image away. It has been shown that these trainings can enhance treatment outcome (e.g. lower relapse rates) among alcohol-addicted patients (Wiers, Eberl, Rinck, Becker, \& Lindenmeyer, 2011). The aim of the current study is to test whether the avoidance gesture is as important as suggested by the AAT's name or whether inhibiting the urge to approach alcoholic content might be enough to bring about the effect.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The approach and avoidance task (AAT) has turned out as both a promising diagnostic tool as well as treatment add-on in psychological science. The AAT constitutes one form of cognitive bias modification (CBM), which has been shown to be particularly effective in the field of behavioral addictions, such as alcohol addiction (Eberl et al., 2013; Wiers et al., 2011). The general logic underlying the AAT is to carry out actions that are either compatible or incompatible with an individual's action tendencies. For instance, alcohol addicted patients tend to approach alcohol related stimuli faster than control pictures (i.e. soft drink stimuli), when they are instructed to react upon the format of a picture and not to its' content. This tendency of comparatively faster approaching and slower avoiding alcohol-related stimuli than soft drink content has been termed an approach bias for alcohol. The AAT as a therapeutic tool tries to counteract or at least to attenuate approach or avoidance biases by instructing patients to carry out approach and avoidance gestures that are in conflict with an individual's acquired action tendencies.

Whereas the general effectiveness of the AAT as a clinical intervention has been demonstrated several times, little is known about possible mechanisms that might subserve these effects. Therefore, the current study is dedicated to shed some light on one such potential mechanism, i.e. the role of the avoidance gesture within the alcohol-AAT.

As already suggested by the name of the AAT, the avoidance gesture seems to be a key ingredient in bringing about therapeutic effects. However, recent empirical evidence has brought about some interesting findings, giving rise to an alternative explanation.

A study by Kühn et al. (2017), contrary to common-held beliefs, indicated that inhibition capacity can be trained. Inhibition, in turn, consistently has been linked to psychopathology and all kinds of behavioural addictions (Smith, Mattick, Jamadar, \& Iredale, 2014). The game by Kühn et al. (2017) used to train inhibition resembled the AAT in several ways, e.g. certain stimuli appearing on a treadmill had to be collected by swiping towards oneself and others had to be ignored and the objects slowly disappeared. The latter element contrasts with the AAT, since the ignored objects don't have to be pushed away. However, it resembles the AAT in the sense that in both cases stimuli slowly fade out of the screen and eventually disappear. These parallel let to the assumption that a new form of the alcohol AAT training might be equally effective in lowering relapse rates among alcoholic patients. More precisely, within the newly conceptualized AAT training patients are instructed to inhibit the urge to respond in response to alcohol-related content and to observe the stimuli fading out of the screen. In contrast, to the classical AAT training this zooming out of alcoholic stimuli is not conditional on an avoidance gesture, i.e. swiping/pushing away the stimulus.

It is hypothesized that compared to a control group, in which alcohol and soft drink stimuli have to be swiped to the left and right, both the classical AAT-and the inhibition group will show lower relapse rates and approach biases after the intervention, i.e. a training period of three weeks. No intergroup differences in terms of relapse rates and alcohol-related approach bias are expected for the classical AAT group and the inhibition group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alcohol Dependence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Alcohol patients are randomly assigned to one of three conditions and are tested on three consecutive points in time.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants do not know that there exists more than one condition.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Inhibition group

The inhibition group gets the instructions to respond to pictures containing soft drinks by swiping/pulling them towards themselves, whereas pictures with alcoholic content shall be ignored. Up on pulling the pictures successively enlarge, whereas they shrink when ignored and slowly fade out.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Inhibit AAT

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.

Classical AAT group

The classical AAT group is provided with a tablet on which an explicit AAT training is installed. Thus, just as participants in the inhibition group, participants are instructed to react upon soft drinks by swiping/pulling towards themselves the picture. Pictures containing alcoholic content shall be pushed away. Up on pulling pictures enlarge and up on pushing they shrink until they fade out.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

classical AAT

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.

Control group

This type of active control group receives the instructions to swipe alcohol pictures to the left and soft drink pictures to the right (or vice versa depending on the sequential counterbalancing procedure).

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Control Group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Inhibit AAT

Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

classical AAT

Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control Group

Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of alcohol dependence (SKID-I)
* Abstinence from alcohol (at least 72 hours) and absence of major withdrawal symptoms
* Being in between 18-76 years of age
* Being able to understand rationales of the study and signing written informed consent
* Currently being inpatient seeking help overcoming alcohol dependence
* Medication allowed: Antiepileptic's (such as Carbamezepin), antidepressants, substances to treat other non-psychiatric diseases

Exclusion Criteria

* Impaired ability to cooperate
* Presence of another substance dependency than alcohol and nicotine within the last year
* Presence of another axis-I disorder that interferes with the ability to cooperate within the study programme
* Current episode of a major depression
* Presence of axis-II disorders
* Presence of schizoaffective disorders
* Alcohol consumption in between withdrawal and start of the study
* Somatic or neurological disease that precludes the proper execution of the study
* Long-term intake of neuroleptics or hypnotics
* Current intake of benzodiazepines or Clomethiazol (in the period of five half-value times prior to the start of the study)
* Participation in other studies or other treatments than treatment as usual
* Planned long-term therapy after 3-week withdrawal programme
* Being homeless
* Prior electroconvulsive therapy
* Language barriers that preclude proper understanding of study contents
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simone Kühn, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dimitrij Kugler, M.Sc.

Role: CONTACT

0049 40 7410 24113

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dimitrij Kugler, M.Sc.

Role: primary

0049 40 7410 24113

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kuhn S, Lorenz RC, Weichenberger M, Becker M, Haesner M, O'Sullivan J, Steinert A, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Brandhorst S, Bremer T, Gallinat J. Taking control! Structural and behavioural plasticity in response to game-based inhibition training in older adults. Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.026. Epub 2017 May 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28527788 (View on PubMed)

Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Apr;4:38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23218805 (View on PubMed)

Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):490-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400615. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21389338 (View on PubMed)

Smith JL, Mattick RP, Jamadar SD, Iredale JM. Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Dec 1;145:1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Aug 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25195081 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAT001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Integrative Therapy in Alcoholism
NCT00159107 COMPLETED PHASE4
Glutamatergic Modulation of Disordered Alcohol Use
NCT02539511 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
AAT-App Outpatient Trial
NCT05120856 COMPLETED NA