The Approach and Avoidance Task (AAT) in Alcoholic Inpatients
NCT ID: NCT04054336
Last Updated: 2019-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-02
2020-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to counteract these dysfunctional approach or avoidance tendencies, an AAT-training has been developed. In this training participants/patients learn to either avoid or approach disease-specific objects. Alcohol-dependent patients, for instance, learn to avoid alcohol-related pictures by pushing or swiping the image away. It has been shown that these trainings can enhance treatment outcome (e.g. lower relapse rates) among alcohol-addicted patients (Wiers, Eberl, Rinck, Becker, \& Lindenmeyer, 2011). The aim of the current study is to test whether the avoidance gesture is as important as suggested by the AAT's name or whether inhibiting the urge to approach alcoholic content might be enough to bring about the effect.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
AAT for Alcohol Use Disorder in Veterans
NCT05372029
New Therapeutic Strategies for Inhibitory Control in Alcoholism
NCT03058276
Inpatient Alcohol Detox & Psychotherapy
NCT03988478
Training Inhibition in Alcohol Use Disorder
NCT03530384
Individualized Assessment and Treatment for Alcoholism II
NCT03233802
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Whereas the general effectiveness of the AAT as a clinical intervention has been demonstrated several times, little is known about possible mechanisms that might subserve these effects. Therefore, the current study is dedicated to shed some light on one such potential mechanism, i.e. the role of the avoidance gesture within the alcohol-AAT.
As already suggested by the name of the AAT, the avoidance gesture seems to be a key ingredient in bringing about therapeutic effects. However, recent empirical evidence has brought about some interesting findings, giving rise to an alternative explanation.
A study by Kühn et al. (2017), contrary to common-held beliefs, indicated that inhibition capacity can be trained. Inhibition, in turn, consistently has been linked to psychopathology and all kinds of behavioural addictions (Smith, Mattick, Jamadar, \& Iredale, 2014). The game by Kühn et al. (2017) used to train inhibition resembled the AAT in several ways, e.g. certain stimuli appearing on a treadmill had to be collected by swiping towards oneself and others had to be ignored and the objects slowly disappeared. The latter element contrasts with the AAT, since the ignored objects don't have to be pushed away. However, it resembles the AAT in the sense that in both cases stimuli slowly fade out of the screen and eventually disappear. These parallel let to the assumption that a new form of the alcohol AAT training might be equally effective in lowering relapse rates among alcoholic patients. More precisely, within the newly conceptualized AAT training patients are instructed to inhibit the urge to respond in response to alcohol-related content and to observe the stimuli fading out of the screen. In contrast, to the classical AAT training this zooming out of alcoholic stimuli is not conditional on an avoidance gesture, i.e. swiping/pushing away the stimulus.
It is hypothesized that compared to a control group, in which alcohol and soft drink stimuli have to be swiped to the left and right, both the classical AAT-and the inhibition group will show lower relapse rates and approach biases after the intervention, i.e. a training period of three weeks. No intergroup differences in terms of relapse rates and alcohol-related approach bias are expected for the classical AAT group and the inhibition group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Inhibition group
The inhibition group gets the instructions to respond to pictures containing soft drinks by swiping/pulling them towards themselves, whereas pictures with alcoholic content shall be ignored. Up on pulling the pictures successively enlarge, whereas they shrink when ignored and slowly fade out.
Inhibit AAT
Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.
Classical AAT group
The classical AAT group is provided with a tablet on which an explicit AAT training is installed. Thus, just as participants in the inhibition group, participants are instructed to react upon soft drinks by swiping/pulling towards themselves the picture. Pictures containing alcoholic content shall be pushed away. Up on pulling pictures enlarge and up on pushing they shrink until they fade out.
classical AAT
Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.
Control group
This type of active control group receives the instructions to swipe alcohol pictures to the left and soft drink pictures to the right (or vice versa depending on the sequential counterbalancing procedure).
Control Group
Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Inhibit AAT
Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.
classical AAT
Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.
Control Group
Participants receive an Ipad, on which the app is installed. They are instructed to train for a period of three weeks for at least 15 minutes a day.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Abstinence from alcohol (at least 72 hours) and absence of major withdrawal symptoms
* Being in between 18-76 years of age
* Being able to understand rationales of the study and signing written informed consent
* Currently being inpatient seeking help overcoming alcohol dependence
* Medication allowed: Antiepileptic's (such as Carbamezepin), antidepressants, substances to treat other non-psychiatric diseases
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of another substance dependency than alcohol and nicotine within the last year
* Presence of another axis-I disorder that interferes with the ability to cooperate within the study programme
* Current episode of a major depression
* Presence of axis-II disorders
* Presence of schizoaffective disorders
* Alcohol consumption in between withdrawal and start of the study
* Somatic or neurological disease that precludes the proper execution of the study
* Long-term intake of neuroleptics or hypnotics
* Current intake of benzodiazepines or Clomethiazol (in the period of five half-value times prior to the start of the study)
* Participation in other studies or other treatments than treatment as usual
* Planned long-term therapy after 3-week withdrawal programme
* Being homeless
* Prior electroconvulsive therapy
* Language barriers that preclude proper understanding of study contents
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Simone Kühn, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kuhn S, Lorenz RC, Weichenberger M, Becker M, Haesner M, O'Sullivan J, Steinert A, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Brandhorst S, Bremer T, Gallinat J. Taking control! Structural and behavioural plasticity in response to game-based inhibition training in older adults. Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.026. Epub 2017 May 17.
Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Apr;4:38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):490-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400615. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
Smith JL, Mattick RP, Jamadar SD, Iredale JM. Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Dec 1;145:1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAT001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.