Estimated Oxygen Extraction Versus Dynamic Parameters for Perioperative Hemodynamic Optimization
NCT ID: NCT04053595
Last Updated: 2020-03-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-30
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that a perioperative hemodynamic optimization protocol based on oxygen extraction is not inferior to a protocol based on dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness considering the complication rate developed postoperatively.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Driving Pressure During General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery
NCT03884543
Agreements Between Transcutaneous and Arterial Monitoring of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide After Non-cardiac Surgery
NCT04735380
Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Pulmonary Mechanics
NCT02330120
Goal-directed Low Oxygen During Anesthesia
NCT05263154
Comparison of the Effects of Oxycodone Versus Fentanyl on Airway Reflex to Tracheal Extubation and Postoperative Pain
NCT03204045
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Every patient that probably will not be able to face the surgical stress himself might benefit from modulation of haemodynamic parameters. Actually, goal directed therapy (GDT) is able to improve survival only in high-risk surgical patients. Instead, the reduction of complications rate has been shown also in intermediate-risk population.
Originally, hemodynamic optimisation protocols were developed to reach supranormal value for cardiac output (CO), oxygen delivery (DO2) and VO2. Based on the concept that oxygen extraction rate (O2ER) reflects the balance between DO2 and VO2, a GDT protocol based on O2ER estimation (O2ERe) calculated as (SaO2-ScvO2)/SaO2 has been proposed showing a significantly lower number of organ failure postoperatively compared with control group.
The major determinants of DO2 are cardiac output (CO), haemoglobin level (Hb) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2).
An inadequate CO may be optimised using fluids as first line therapy and then inotropes.
In mechanically ventilated patients, heart-lung interaction is useful to recognise in which portion of the Frank-Starling curve the heart of the patient is working and then if CO is able to rise after fluid administration aimed to increase preload. Several parameters based on mini-invasive monitor systems are available to assess fluid responsiveness such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Estimated Oxygen Extraction
Estimated oxygen extraction protocol
Oxygen extraction is estimated by the difference of arterial oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation divided by arterial oxygen saturation. A cutoff of 27% is used as a marker of inadequate tissue perfusion requiring hemodynamic optimization.
Dynamic Parameters
Dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness protocol
Dynamic parameter of fluid responsiveness (pulse pressure variation/stroke volume variation) are used to optimize hemodynamics intraoperatively and during the first 6 hours postoperatively when appropriate. A cutoff of 12% is used to predict an increase of stroke volume \>10% after fluid administration.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness protocol
Dynamic parameter of fluid responsiveness (pulse pressure variation/stroke volume variation) are used to optimize hemodynamics intraoperatively and during the first 6 hours postoperatively when appropriate. A cutoff of 12% is used to predict an increase of stroke volume \>10% after fluid administration.
Estimated oxygen extraction protocol
Oxygen extraction is estimated by the difference of arterial oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation divided by arterial oxygen saturation. A cutoff of 27% is used as a marker of inadequate tissue perfusion requiring hemodynamic optimization.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* expected duration of surgical procedure higher than 120 minutes
* ASA II-III-IV
* planned postoperative ICU/HDU admission
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* arrhythmia
* arterial curve alteration (resonance, damping) not solvable
* palliative surgical procedures
* denial of consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Università Politecnica delle Marche
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abele Donati, MD
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abele Donati, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona
Ancona, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Carsetti A, Amici M, Bernacconi T, Brancaleoni P, Cerutti E, Chiarello M, Cingolani D, Cola L, Corsi D, Forlini G, Giampieri M, Iuorio S, Principi T, Tappata G, Tempesta M, Adrario E, Donati A. Estimated oxygen extraction versus dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness for perioperative hemodynamic optimization of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr 18;20(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01011-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLRZ01-19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.