Evaluation Of One Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens and Two Hydrogel Lenses in Daily Wear

NCT ID: NCT04050618

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-09

Study Completion Date

2019-11-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the comparative clinical performance of the fanfilcon A silicone hydrogel lens used in daily wear and to compare this with competitive hydrogel lens products.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This 8-week, subject-masked, bilateral, two-part, cross-over evaluation will compare the clinical performance of fanfilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lens and competitive hydrogel contact lenses when worn daily. Lenses will be replaced either on a 2-weekly or 4-weekly basis, depending on control lens group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Subjects will be masked to lens type. Investigators will be unmasked.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ocufilcon D control lens, then fanfilcon A test lens

Participants will wear the ocufilcon D control lens for 4 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 4 weeks of daily wear.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

fanfilcon A test lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Silicone hydrogel contact lens

ocufilcon D control lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

hydrogel contact lens

etafilcon A controls, then fanfilcon A test lens

Participants will wear the etafilcon D control lens for 2 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 2 weeks of daily wear.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

fanfilcon A test lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Silicone hydrogel contact lens

etafilcon A control lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

hydrogel contact lens

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fanfilcon A test lens

Silicone hydrogel contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

ocufilcon D control lens

hydrogel contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

etafilcon A control lens

hydrogel contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

test lens Avaira Vitality Biomedics 55 Premier ocufilcon D (4-weekly) control lens etafilcon A (2-weekly) control lens Acuvue 2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be a currently adapted soft contact lens wearer (\>1 month of lens wear).
* Be at least 18 years of age.
* Refractive astigmatism \<1.00D in both eyes.
* Have clear corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders.
* Be correctable through spherocylindrical refraction to 20/25 or better in each eye.
* Contact lens sphere requirement between -1.00D and -6.00D (inclusive).
* Require visual correction in both eyes (monovision allowed, no monofit).
* Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:

1. No amblyopia
2. No strabismus
3. No evidence of lid abnormality or infection
4. No conjunctival abnormality or infection that would contraindicate contact lens wear
5. No clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. corneal staining, stromal edema, staining, scarring, vascularization, infiltrates or abnormal opacities)
6. No other active ocular disease.
* Own a mobile phone and be able to respond to SMS survey during the period 8am-8pm.
* Willing to comply with the wear and study visit schedule.

Exclusion Criteria

* Using CooperVision Avaira Vitality, J\&J Acuvue 2 or CooperVision Biomedics 55.
* Require toric or multifocal contact lenses.
* Previously shown a sensitivity to any of the study solution components.
* Any systemic or ocular disease or allergies affecting ocular health.
* Using systemic or topical medications that will in the investigator's opinion affect ocular physiology or lens performance.
* Clinically significant (\>Grade 3) corneal staining, corneal stromal edema, corneal vascularization, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar hyperemia, limbal hyperemia, or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
* Any corneal infiltrates or any corneal scarring or neovascularization within the central 5mm of the cornea.
* Keratoconus or other corneal irregularity.
* Aphakia or amblyopia.
* Have undergone corneal refractive surgery or any anterior segment surgery.
* Abnormal lacrimal secretions.
* Has diabetes.
* Known/reported infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV).
* History of chronic eye disease (e.g. glaucoma).
* Pregnant or lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment.
* Participation in any concurrent clinical trial or in last 30 days.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CooperVision, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David C Ardaya, OD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Golden Optometric Group

William J Bogus, OD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Office of William J. Bogus, O.D.

Bryan E Frazier, OD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Frazier Vision, Inc

Wayne Golden, OD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Golden Vision

Andrew J Sacco, OD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sacco Eye Group

Christopher Pearson, OD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Omega Vision Center PA (DBA Sabal Eye Care)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Golden Optometric Group

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Omega Vision Center PA (DBA Sabal Eye Care)

Longwood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Golden Vision

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sacco Eye Group

Vestal, New York, United States

Site Status

Frazier Vision, Inc

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Office of William J. Bogus, O.D.

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EX-MKTG-103

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.