Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation Of One Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens and Two Hydrogel Lenses in Daily Wear (NCT NCT04050618)
NCT ID: NCT04050618
Last Updated: 2020-10-19
Results Overview
Subjective overall comfort rating was assessed on a 0-10 subjective scale, 0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=can't feel lenses
COMPLETED
NA
114 participants
Two weeks
2020-10-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D Control Lens, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
Participants will wear the ocufilcon D control lens for 4 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 4 weeks of daily wear.
ocufilcon D control lens: hydrogel contact lens
fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
|
Etafilcon A Controls, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
Participants will wear the etafilcon D control lens for 2 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 2 weeks of daily wear.
etafilcon A control lens: hydrogel contact lens
fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
58
|
56
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
56
|
56
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
56
|
56
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
55
|
56
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D Control Lens, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
Participants will wear the ocufilcon D control lens for 4 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 4 weeks of daily wear.
ocufilcon D control lens: hydrogel contact lens
fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
|
Etafilcon A Controls, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
Participants will wear the etafilcon D control lens for 2 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 2 weeks of daily wear.
etafilcon A control lens: hydrogel contact lens
fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation Of One Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens and Two Hydrogel Lenses in Daily Wear
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D Control Lens, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
n=58 Participants
Participants will wear the ocufilcon D control lens for 4 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 4 weeks of daily wear.
ocufilcon D control lens: hydrogel contact lens
fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
|
Etafilcon A Controls, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
n=56 Participants
Participants will wear the etafilcon D control lens for 2 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 2 weeks of daily wear.
etafilcon A control lens: hydrogel contact lens
fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
|
Total
n=114 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.42 • n=5 Participants
|
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.00 • n=7 Participants
|
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.18 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
58 participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 participants
n=7 Participants
|
114 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksSubjective overall comfort rating was assessed on a 0-10 subjective scale, 0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=can't feel lenses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=57 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Overall Comfort Rating
|
8.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04
|
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
8.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
8.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksSubjective overall comfort rating was assessed on a 0-10 subjective scale, 0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=can't feel lenses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=55 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Overall Comfort Rating
|
7.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.10
|
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksAverage wearing time - measured by time of day using 24-hour clock, to the nearest 10 minutes
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=57 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Wearing Time
|
14.01 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.689
|
14.7 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.674
|
13.84 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.756
|
13.80 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.757
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksAverage wearing time - measured by time of day using 24-hour clock, to the nearest 10 minutes
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=55 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Wearing Time
|
14.21 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.501
|
14.42 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.504
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksAverage comfortable wearing time was assessed by time of day when first aware of lenses using 24-hour clock, to the nearest 10 minutes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=57 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Comfortable Wearing Time
|
11.60 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.743
|
12.45 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.669
|
12.18 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.210
|
11.67 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.330
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksAverage comfortable wearing time was assessed by time of day when first aware of lenses using 24-hour clock, to the nearest 10 minutes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=55 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Comfortable Wearing Time
|
11.37 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.869
|
12.40 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.379
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes)Lens centration will be recorded in the scale of 0 to 2 (0=centered - optimal, 1 = decentered slightly, 2 = substantially decentered (\>0.5mm)).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lens Centration
Optimal
|
85 percentage of eyes
|
93 percentage of eyes
|
91 percentage of eyes
|
94 percentage of eyes
|
|
Lens Centration
Slight
|
15 percentage of eyes
|
7 percentage of eyes
|
9 percentage of eyes
|
6 percentage of eyes
|
|
Lens Centration
Substantial
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksLens centration will be recorded in the scale of 0 to 2 (0=centered - optimal, 1 = decentered slightly, 2 = substantially decentered (\>0.5mm)).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lens Centration
Optimal
|
88 percentage of eyes
|
93 percentage of eyes
|
83 percentage of eyes
|
95 percentage of eyes
|
|
Lens Centration
Slight
|
12 percentage of eyes
|
7 percentage of eyes
|
17 percentage of eyes
|
5 percentage of eyes
|
|
Lens Centration
Substantial
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksLens centration will be recorded in the scale of 0 to 2 (0=centered - optimal, 1 = decentered slightly, 2 = substantially decentered (\>0.5mm)).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lens Centration
Optimal
|
86 percentage of eyes
|
89 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Lens Centration
Slight
|
14 percentage of eyes
|
11 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Lens Centration
Substantial
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Corneal coverage (yes=full corneal coverage all times / no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Coverage
yes
|
100 percentage of eyes
|
100 percentage of eyes
|
100 percentage of eyes
|
100 percentage of eyes
|
|
Corneal Coverage
no
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksCorneal coverage (yes=full corneal coverage all times / no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Coverage
yes
|
98 percentage of eyes
|
98 percentage of eyes
|
100 percentage of eyes
|
100 percentage of eyes
|
|
Corneal Coverage
no
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksCorneal coverage (yes=full corneal coverage all times / no=incomplete corneal coverage)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Coverage
yes
|
100 percentage of eyes
|
98 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Coverage
no
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Post-blink movement measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Insufficient
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Minimal
|
4 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
9 percentage of eyes
|
5 percentage of eyes
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Optimal
|
91 percentage of eyes
|
94 percentage of eyes
|
84 percentage of eyes
|
82 percentage of eyes
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Moderate
|
5 percentage of eyes
|
6 percentage of eyes
|
5 percentage of eyes
|
13 percentage of eyes
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Excessive
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksPost-blink movement measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Excessive
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Insufficient
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Minimal
|
4 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
11 percentage of eyes
|
5 percentage of eyes
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Optimal
|
91 percentage of eyes
|
98 percentage of eyes
|
83 percentage of eyes
|
91 percentage of eyes
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Moderate
|
5 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
6 percentage of eyes
|
4 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksPost-blink movement measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Insufficient
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Minimal
|
4 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Optimal
|
80 percentage of eyes
|
96 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Moderate
|
16 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Post-Blink Movement
Excessive
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Lens tightness - push-up test 0-100% continuous scale (100%=movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lens Tightness - Push-up Test
|
49.6 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 5.36
|
49.0 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 3.80
|
52.1 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 8.26
|
50.2 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 5.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksLens tightness - push-up test 0-100% continuous scale (100%=movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lens Tightness - Push-up Test
|
49.7 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 4.12
|
48.4 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 4.55
|
50.6 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 5.88
|
48.0 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 7.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksLens tightness - push-up test 0-100% continuous scale (100%=movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lens Tightness - Push-up Test
|
48.4 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
49.8 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 3.67
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Overall lens fit acceptance - Graded on a scale of 0-4 (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but not acceptable, 2=minimal acceptable, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Should not be worn
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Borderline
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Minimal
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OK
|
22 percentage of eyes
|
9 percentage of eyes
|
18 percentage of eyes
|
21 percentage of eyes
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Perfect
|
78 percentage of eyes
|
91 percentage of eyes
|
82 percentage of eyes
|
79 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksOverall lens fit acceptance - Graded on a scale of 0-4 (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but not acceptable, 2=minimal acceptable, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Should not be worn
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Borderline
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Minimal
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OK
|
16 percentage of eyes
|
12 percentage of eyes
|
26 percentage of eyes
|
13 percentage of eyes
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Perfect
|
84 percentage of eyes
|
88 percentage of eyes
|
74 percentage of eyes
|
88 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksOverall lens fit acceptance - Graded on a scale of 0-4 (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but not acceptable, 2=minimal acceptable, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Should not be worn
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Borderline
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Minimal
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OK
|
23 percentage of eyes
|
15 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Perfect
|
77 percentage of eyes
|
85 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Lens surface wettability rated on the appearance on the lens surface (0-4 scale, 0=Very poor: immediately displaying non-wetting areas on lens surface, 4=Excellent: appearance of a healthy cornea with very long drying time).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rating of Lens Surface Wettability
|
3.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.266
|
3.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.172
|
3.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.286
|
3.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.265
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksLens surface wettability rated on the appearance on the lens surface (0-4 scale, 0=Very poor: immediately displaying non-wetting areas on lens surface, 4=Excellent: appearance of a healthy cornea with very long drying time).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=57 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rating of Lens Surface Wettability
|
3.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.490
|
3.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.512
|
3.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.611
|
3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.437
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksLens surface wettability rated on the appearance on the lens surface (0-4 scale, 0=Very poor: immediately displaying non-wetting areas on lens surface, 4=Excellent: appearance of a healthy cornea with very long drying time).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rating of Lens Surface Wettability
|
3.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.736
|
3.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.365
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksPresence of film deposits on front surface of the lens graded 0-4 (0=No film, 1=Slight film visible only under magnification, 2=Moderate film only under magnification, 3=Moderate film visible to the naked eye, 4=heavy film visible to the naked eye).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 0
|
85 percentage of eyes
|
86 percentage of eyes
|
85 percentage of eyes
|
86 percentage of eyes
|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 1
|
12 percentage of eyes
|
13 percentage of eyes
|
13 percentage of eyes
|
13 percentage of eyes
|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 2
|
3 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 3
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 4
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
1 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksPresence of film deposits on front surface of the lens graded 0-4 (0=No film, 1=Slight film visible only under magnification, 2=Moderate film only under magnification, 3=Moderate film visible to the naked eye, 4=heavy film visible to the naked eye).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 0
|
74 percentage of eyes
|
79 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 1
|
22 percentage of eyes
|
17 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 2
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 3
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
0 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 4
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
2 percentage of eyes
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksNumber of white spot deposits assessed using slit lamp with white light, low medium magnification
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of White Spot Deposits
|
0.01 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.094
|
0.05 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.567
|
0.03 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.211
|
0.22 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 1.145
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksNumber of white spot deposits assessed using slit lamp with white light, low medium magnification
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of White Spot Deposits
|
0.15 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.988
|
0.18 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.940
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)Primary gaze lag measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Insufficient
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
2 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Minimal
|
5 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
8 eyes
|
6 eyes
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Optimal
|
107 eyes
|
106 eyes
|
100 eyes
|
93 eyes
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Moderate
|
4 eyes
|
6 eyes
|
2 eyes
|
13 eyes
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Excessive
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeksPrimary gaze lag measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Insufficient
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Minimal
|
2 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
8 eyes
|
2 eyes
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Optimal
|
108 eyes
|
109 eyes
|
97 eyes
|
108 eyes
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Moderate
|
4 eyes
|
3 eyes
|
7 eyes
|
2 eyes
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Excessive
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Four weeksPrimary gaze lag measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Insufficient
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Minimal
|
2 eyes
|
2 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Optimal
|
96 eyes
|
106 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Moderate
|
14 eyes
|
2 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Primary Gaze Lag
Excessive
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 - 8:00amPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=43 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=45 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.607
|
9.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.146
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 - 12:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=52 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.601
|
9.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.180
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 - 4:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.384
|
8.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.458
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3 - 8:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=55 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=46 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.912
|
8.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.377
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 7 - 8:00amPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=40 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=44 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.727
|
8.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.328
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 7 - 12:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=43 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.750
|
8.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.336
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 7 - 4:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=49 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=45 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.869
|
8.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.261
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 7 - 8:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=50 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=45 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.920
|
8.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.722
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 12 - 8:00amPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=47 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=39 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.896
|
8.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.348
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 12 - 12:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=47 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=51 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.721
|
8.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.387
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 12 - 4:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=50 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=50 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.710
|
8.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.459
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 12 - 8:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=51 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=49 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.023
|
8.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.382
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 26 - 8:00amPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=40 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=43 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.861
|
8.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.277
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 26 - 12:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=50 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=45 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.741
|
8.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.392
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 26 - 4:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=51 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=47 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
8.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.876
|
8.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.609
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 26 - 8:00pmPopulation: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.
Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=52 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comfort Throughout the Day
|
7.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.127
|
8.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.774
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Ocufilcon D - Group A
Fanfilcon A - Group A
Etafilcon A - Group B
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=58 participants at risk
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks.
Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=57 participants at risk
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=56 participants at risk
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks.
Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
|
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=56 participants at risk
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks.
Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
headache
|
3.4%
2/58 • Number of events 2 • From dispense up to 4 weeks for ocufilcon D and fanfilcon A - Group A, from dispense up to 2 weeks for etafilcon A and fanfilcon A - Group B. A total of 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/57 • From dispense up to 4 weeks for ocufilcon D and fanfilcon A - Group A, from dispense up to 2 weeks for etafilcon A and fanfilcon A - Group B. A total of 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/56 • From dispense up to 4 weeks for ocufilcon D and fanfilcon A - Group A, from dispense up to 2 weeks for etafilcon A and fanfilcon A - Group B. A total of 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/56 • From dispense up to 4 weeks for ocufilcon D and fanfilcon A - Group A, from dispense up to 2 weeks for etafilcon A and fanfilcon A - Group B. A total of 8 weeks
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place