Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation Of One Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens and Two Hydrogel Lenses in Daily Wear (NCT NCT04050618)

NCT ID: NCT04050618

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Results Overview

Subjective overall comfort rating was assessed on a 0-10 subjective scale, 0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=can't feel lenses

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

114 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Two weeks

Results posted on

2020-10-19

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Ocufilcon D Control Lens, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
Participants will wear the ocufilcon D control lens for 4 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 4 weeks of daily wear. ocufilcon D control lens: hydrogel contact lens fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
Etafilcon A Controls, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
Participants will wear the etafilcon D control lens for 2 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 2 weeks of daily wear. etafilcon A control lens: hydrogel contact lens fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
First Intervention
STARTED
58
56
First Intervention
COMPLETED
56
56
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
2
0
Second Intervention
STARTED
56
56
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
55
56
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
1
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Ocufilcon D Control Lens, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
Participants will wear the ocufilcon D control lens for 4 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 4 weeks of daily wear. ocufilcon D control lens: hydrogel contact lens fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
Etafilcon A Controls, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
Participants will wear the etafilcon D control lens for 2 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 2 weeks of daily wear. etafilcon A control lens: hydrogel contact lens fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
First Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
2
0
Second Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Evaluation Of One Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens and Two Hydrogel Lenses in Daily Wear

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Ocufilcon D Control Lens, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
n=58 Participants
Participants will wear the ocufilcon D control lens for 4 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 4 weeks of daily wear. ocufilcon D control lens: hydrogel contact lens fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
Etafilcon A Controls, Then Fanfilcon A Test Lens
n=56 Participants
Participants will wear the etafilcon D control lens for 2 weeks, then crossover to fanfilcon A test lens for 2 weeks of daily wear. etafilcon A control lens: hydrogel contact lens fanfilcon A test lens: Silicone hydrogel contact lens
Total
n=114 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
114 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.42 • n=5 Participants
32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.00 • n=7 Participants
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.18 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
108 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
58 participants
n=5 Participants
56 participants
n=7 Participants
114 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Subjective overall comfort rating was assessed on a 0-10 subjective scale, 0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=can't feel lenses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=57 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Subjective Overall Comfort Rating
8.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
8.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
8.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.64

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Subjective overall comfort rating was assessed on a 0-10 subjective scale, 0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=can't feel lenses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=55 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Subjective Overall Comfort Rating
7.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.10
8.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Average wearing time - measured by time of day using 24-hour clock, to the nearest 10 minutes

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=57 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Average Wearing Time
14.01 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.689
14.7 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.674
13.84 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.756
13.80 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.757

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Average wearing time - measured by time of day using 24-hour clock, to the nearest 10 minutes

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=55 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Average Wearing Time
14.21 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.501
14.42 hours/day
Standard Deviation 1.504

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Average comfortable wearing time was assessed by time of day when first aware of lenses using 24-hour clock, to the nearest 10 minutes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=57 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Average Comfortable Wearing Time
11.60 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.743
12.45 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.669
12.18 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.210
11.67 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.330

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Average comfortable wearing time was assessed by time of day when first aware of lenses using 24-hour clock, to the nearest 10 minutes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=56 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=55 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Average Comfortable Wearing Time
11.37 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.869
12.40 hours/day
Standard Deviation 3.379

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes)

Lens centration will be recorded in the scale of 0 to 2 (0=centered - optimal, 1 = decentered slightly, 2 = substantially decentered (\>0.5mm)).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Lens Centration
Optimal
85 percentage of eyes
93 percentage of eyes
91 percentage of eyes
94 percentage of eyes
Lens Centration
Slight
15 percentage of eyes
7 percentage of eyes
9 percentage of eyes
6 percentage of eyes
Lens Centration
Substantial
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Lens centration will be recorded in the scale of 0 to 2 (0=centered - optimal, 1 = decentered slightly, 2 = substantially decentered (\>0.5mm)).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Lens Centration
Optimal
88 percentage of eyes
93 percentage of eyes
83 percentage of eyes
95 percentage of eyes
Lens Centration
Slight
12 percentage of eyes
7 percentage of eyes
17 percentage of eyes
5 percentage of eyes
Lens Centration
Substantial
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Lens centration will be recorded in the scale of 0 to 2 (0=centered - optimal, 1 = decentered slightly, 2 = substantially decentered (\>0.5mm)).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Lens Centration
Optimal
86 percentage of eyes
89 percentage of eyes
Lens Centration
Slight
14 percentage of eyes
11 percentage of eyes
Lens Centration
Substantial
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Corneal coverage (yes=full corneal coverage all times / no=incomplete corneal coverage)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Corneal Coverage
yes
100 percentage of eyes
100 percentage of eyes
100 percentage of eyes
100 percentage of eyes
Corneal Coverage
no
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Corneal coverage (yes=full corneal coverage all times / no=incomplete corneal coverage)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Corneal Coverage
yes
98 percentage of eyes
98 percentage of eyes
100 percentage of eyes
100 percentage of eyes
Corneal Coverage
no
2 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Corneal coverage (yes=full corneal coverage all times / no=incomplete corneal coverage)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Corneal Coverage
yes
100 percentage of eyes
98 percentage of eyes
Corneal Coverage
no
0 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Post-blink movement measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Post-Blink Movement
Insufficient
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Minimal
4 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
9 percentage of eyes
5 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Optimal
91 percentage of eyes
94 percentage of eyes
84 percentage of eyes
82 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Moderate
5 percentage of eyes
6 percentage of eyes
5 percentage of eyes
13 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Excessive
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Post-blink movement measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Post-Blink Movement
Excessive
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Insufficient
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Minimal
4 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
11 percentage of eyes
5 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Optimal
91 percentage of eyes
98 percentage of eyes
83 percentage of eyes
91 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Moderate
5 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
6 percentage of eyes
4 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Post-blink movement measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Post-Blink Movement
Insufficient
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Minimal
4 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Optimal
80 percentage of eyes
96 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Moderate
16 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
Post-Blink Movement
Excessive
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Lens tightness - push-up test 0-100% continuous scale (100%=movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Lens Tightness - Push-up Test
49.6 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 5.36
49.0 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 3.80
52.1 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 8.26
50.2 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 5.69

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Lens tightness - push-up test 0-100% continuous scale (100%=movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Lens Tightness - Push-up Test
49.7 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 4.12
48.4 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 4.55
50.6 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 5.88
48.0 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 7.95

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Lens tightness - push-up test 0-100% continuous scale (100%=movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Lens Tightness - Push-up Test
48.4 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 5.62
49.8 percentage of eyes
Standard Deviation 3.67

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Overall lens fit acceptance - Graded on a scale of 0-4 (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but not acceptable, 2=minimal acceptable, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Should not be worn
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Borderline
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Minimal
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OK
22 percentage of eyes
9 percentage of eyes
18 percentage of eyes
21 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Perfect
78 percentage of eyes
91 percentage of eyes
82 percentage of eyes
79 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Overall lens fit acceptance - Graded on a scale of 0-4 (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but not acceptable, 2=minimal acceptable, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Should not be worn
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Borderline
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Minimal
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OK
16 percentage of eyes
12 percentage of eyes
26 percentage of eyes
13 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Perfect
84 percentage of eyes
88 percentage of eyes
74 percentage of eyes
88 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Overall lens fit acceptance - Graded on a scale of 0-4 (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but not acceptable, 2=minimal acceptable, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Should not be worn
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Borderline
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Minimal
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
OK
23 percentage of eyes
15 percentage of eyes
Overall Lens Fit Acceptance
Perfect
77 percentage of eyes
85 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Lens surface wettability rated on the appearance on the lens surface (0-4 scale, 0=Very poor: immediately displaying non-wetting areas on lens surface, 4=Excellent: appearance of a healthy cornea with very long drying time).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Rating of Lens Surface Wettability
3.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.266
3.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.172
3.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.286
3.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.265

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Lens surface wettability rated on the appearance on the lens surface (0-4 scale, 0=Very poor: immediately displaying non-wetting areas on lens surface, 4=Excellent: appearance of a healthy cornea with very long drying time).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=57 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Rating of Lens Surface Wettability
3.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.490
3.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.512
3.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.611
3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.437

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Lens surface wettability rated on the appearance on the lens surface (0-4 scale, 0=Very poor: immediately displaying non-wetting areas on lens surface, 4=Excellent: appearance of a healthy cornea with very long drying time).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Rating of Lens Surface Wettability
3.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.736
3.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.365

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Presence of film deposits on front surface of the lens graded 0-4 (0=No film, 1=Slight film visible only under magnification, 2=Moderate film only under magnification, 3=Moderate film visible to the naked eye, 4=heavy film visible to the naked eye).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 0
85 percentage of eyes
86 percentage of eyes
85 percentage of eyes
86 percentage of eyes
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 1
12 percentage of eyes
13 percentage of eyes
13 percentage of eyes
13 percentage of eyes
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 2
3 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 3
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 4
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
1 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Presence of film deposits on front surface of the lens graded 0-4 (0=No film, 1=Slight film visible only under magnification, 2=Moderate film only under magnification, 3=Moderate film visible to the naked eye, 4=heavy film visible to the naked eye).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 0
74 percentage of eyes
79 percentage of eyes
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 1
22 percentage of eyes
17 percentage of eyes
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 2
2 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 3
0 percentage of eyes
0 percentage of eyes
Presence of Film Deposits
Grade 4
2 percentage of eyes
2 percentage of eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Number of white spot deposits assessed using slit lamp with white light, low medium magnification

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Number of White Spot Deposits
0.01 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.094
0.05 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.567
0.03 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.211
0.22 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 1.145

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Number of white spot deposits assessed using slit lamp with white light, low medium magnification

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Number of White Spot Deposits
0.15 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.988
0.18 number of white spots
Standard Deviation 0.940

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (after 15 minutes of lens dispense)

Primary gaze lag measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=116 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Primary Gaze Lag
Insufficient
0 eyes
0 eyes
2 eyes
0 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Minimal
5 eyes
0 eyes
8 eyes
6 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Optimal
107 eyes
106 eyes
100 eyes
93 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Moderate
4 eyes
6 eyes
2 eyes
13 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Excessive
0 eyes
0 eyes
0 eyes
0 eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Two weeks

Primary gaze lag measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=114 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Primary Gaze Lag
Insufficient
0 eyes
0 eyes
0 eyes
0 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Minimal
2 eyes
0 eyes
8 eyes
2 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Optimal
108 eyes
109 eyes
97 eyes
108 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Moderate
4 eyes
3 eyes
7 eyes
2 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Excessive
0 eyes
0 eyes
0 eyes
0 eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Four weeks

Primary gaze lag measured by scale 0-4 (0=insufficient, 1=minimal, unacceptable movement, 2=optimal movement, 3=moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=excessive, unacceptable movement)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=112 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=110 eyes
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Primary Gaze Lag
Insufficient
0 eyes
0 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Minimal
2 eyes
2 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Optimal
96 eyes
106 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Moderate
14 eyes
2 eyes
Primary Gaze Lag
Excessive
0 eyes
0 eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 3 - 8:00am

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=43 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=45 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.607
9.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.146

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 3 - 12:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=52 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.601
9.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.180

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 3 - 4:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.384
8.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.458

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 3 - 8:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=55 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=46 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.912
8.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.377

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 7 - 8:00am

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=40 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=44 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.727
8.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.328

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 7 - 12:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=43 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.750
8.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.336

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 7 - 4:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=49 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=45 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.869
8.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.261

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 7 - 8:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=50 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=45 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.920
8.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.722

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 12 - 8:00am

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=47 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=39 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.896
8.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.348

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 12 - 12:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=47 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=51 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.721
8.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.387

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 12 - 4:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=50 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=50 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.710
8.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.459

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 12 - 8:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=51 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=49 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.023
8.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.382

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 26 - 8:00am

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=40 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=43 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.861
8.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.277

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 26 - 12:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=50 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=45 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.741
8.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.392

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 26 - 4:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=51 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=47 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
8.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.876
8.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.609

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 26 - 8:00pm

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed differ based on the number of text responses received.

Comfort throughout the day was assessed on a scale of 0-10 (0=extremely uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel the lenses) using text message responses

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=52 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=48 Participants
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Comfort Throughout the Day
7.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.127
8.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.774

Adverse Events

Ocufilcon D - Group A

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Fanfilcon A - Group A

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Etafilcon A - Group B

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Fanfilcon A - Group B

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Ocufilcon D - Group A
n=58 participants at risk
Subjects were randomized to wear ocufilcon D control lens for four weeks. Ocufilcon D - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group A
n=57 participants at risk
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for four weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
Etafilcon A - Group B
n=56 participants at risk
Subjects were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens for two weeks. Etafilcon A - hydrogel contact lens
Fanfilcon A - Group B
n=56 participants at risk
Subjects were randomized to wear fanfilcon A test lens for two weeks. Fanfilcon A - SiHy contact lens
General disorders
headache
3.4%
2/58 • Number of events 2 • From dispense up to 4 weeks for ocufilcon D and fanfilcon A - Group A, from dispense up to 2 weeks for etafilcon A and fanfilcon A - Group B. A total of 8 weeks
0.00%
0/57 • From dispense up to 4 weeks for ocufilcon D and fanfilcon A - Group A, from dispense up to 2 weeks for etafilcon A and fanfilcon A - Group B. A total of 8 weeks
0.00%
0/56 • From dispense up to 4 weeks for ocufilcon D and fanfilcon A - Group A, from dispense up to 2 weeks for etafilcon A and fanfilcon A - Group B. A total of 8 weeks
0.00%
0/56 • From dispense up to 4 weeks for ocufilcon D and fanfilcon A - Group A, from dispense up to 2 weeks for etafilcon A and fanfilcon A - Group B. A total of 8 weeks

Additional Information

Jose A. Vega, O.D., MSc, FAAO

CooperVision, Inc.

Phone: 925-621-3761

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place