Assessment of Patient Satisfaction of Quality of Health Care Service and Treatment

NCT ID: NCT04048473

Last Updated: 2019-08-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

259 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-09

Study Completion Date

2019-08-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patient satisfaction has become an important issue in the health services evaluation. It is equally important to medical results and economical costs of the provided services. Cancer is a common health problem frequently associated with pain that deserves patient satisfaction services. Assessment of patients' satisfaction in this sector of diseases is a cornerstone for optimum pain management. Recently, patient satisfaction is defined as personal evaluation of the experienced care, denoting both patient characteristics and care realities.

There are many questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction for health care service and treatment. For health service assessment, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) is a commonly used one with high reliability. It includes seven dimensions of patient satisfaction which are general satisfaction, interpersonal manner, communication, technical quality, time spent with doctor, financial aspects, and accessibility and convenience.

With regard to patient satisfaction about the provided treatment, Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS) is routinely applied.

It is well known that any health care system needs continuous evaluation both by the care givers and patients in order to improve the quality of service. Of course, it is a continuous process with much variability. There are many studies about patient satisfaction in cancer patients., however this study is the first in Delta region, Egypt. From this point, the aim of this study is to evaluate the quality offered by health care services and the treatment satisfaction among cancer patients attending the outpatient pain management clinics, Mansoura, Egypt in two university centers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is a cross sectional comparative study in the outpatient pain clinic of MUH and OCMU. These centers serve Delta Region which encompasses 10 governorates with 41% of the total Egyptian population. The study was approved by the Institutional Research Board (Code No: R.19.04.480 ). The sample was recruited using convenience sampling method during the period from April 2019 till July 2019. Two hundred fifty nine patients received medical care with chronic cancer pain aged 18 years or older that are oriented, alert, speak and read Arabic, having no communication problems or physical conditions that will prevent the completion of the interview were included in this study. Patients do not speak or read Arabic, or who are unable to complete the study questionnaires were excluded.

Physicians screen patients for suitability in the study and consent those who met the inclusion criteria. During the studies, participants complete the paper of the measures while they are waiting for their medical consultation.

The health service quality was assessed using Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) (ranging from strongly agree = 1, agree = 2, uncertain = 3, disagree = 4 and strongly disagree = 5). It contains seven domains; general satisfaction (questions (Q) 3 \&17), technical quality(Q 2,4,6 \&14), interpersonal manner (Q 10\& 11), communication (Q 1 \& 13), financial aspects (Q 5\&7), time spent with the doctor (Q12\&15) and accessibility and convenience (Q 8,9,16 \&18).4 Also we evaluated the treatment satisfaction using The Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS) (ranging from 0 = dissatisfied to 100 = satisfied): It includes thirty nine items grouped into five dimensions; satisfaction with current pain medication in two subscales: medication characteristics (3 items) and efficacy (3 items); side effects of medication (12 items); impact of current pain medication (8 items); medical care (8 items) and information about pain and its treatment (5 items).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Satisfaction, Patient

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MUH (Mansoura University Hospital)

enrolled 127 patients in outpatient pain clinic The health service quality was assessed using Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) (ranging from strongly agree = 1, agree = 2, uncertain = 3, disagree = 4 and strongly disagree = 5). Also the treatment satisfaction using The Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS) was evaluated (ranging from 0 = dissatisfied to 100 = satisfied)

No interventions assigned to this group

Ocmu (Oncology center Mansoura University)

enrolled132 patients in outpatient pain clinic The health service quality was assessed using Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) (ranging from strongly agree = 1, agree = 2, uncertain = 3, disagree = 4 and strongly disagree = 5).Also the treatment satisfaction using The Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS) was evaluated (ranging from 0 = dissatisfied to 100 = satisfied)

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients received medical care with chronic cancer pain
* aged 18 years or older
* oriented, alert,
* speak
* read Arabic,
* having no communication problems
* having nophysical conditions that will prevent the completion of the interview

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients do not speak
* Patients do notread Arabic,
* are unable to complete the study questionnaires
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nevert Adel

lecturer, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and pain management, Faculty of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nevert Adel Abdel Ghaffar

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Assessment of Patient Satisfa

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Self-Compassion and Acute Pain
NCT03647683 COMPLETED NA