RAdiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression with Increased Radiation DosES

NCT ID: NCT04043156

Last Updated: 2025-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-08

Study Completion Date

2023-01-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical study aims to investigate whether high-precision radiotherapy, as supposed, leads to a better control of the irradiated spinal cord metastases when compared to conventional radiotherapy. This means that a progression or recurrence of motor deficits (weakness) of the legs following radiotherapy can be avoided more effectively. Furthermore, the high-precision radiotherapy will be compared to the conventional radiotherapy with respect to pain relief, motor function/ability to walk, quality of life, side effects and survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this single-arm study is to show that high-precision radiotherapy (RT) with 18x2.33 Gy in 3.5 weeks results in significantly better local progression free survival (LPFS) of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) when compared to conventional RT with 10x3 Gy in 2 weeks. If such superiority could be shown, 18x2.33 Gy could be recommended, at least for those patients with favourable survival prognoses, since an in-field recurrence of MSCC in the irradiated part of the spine is generally very difficult to treat.

For this investigation the newly prospectively collected data will be compared with a historical cohort collected up to the time of data analysis.

The recruitment of all 65 patients (62 patients + 5% for potential drop-outs) is planned to be completed within 21 months. The follow-up period will be 12 months. This equals a total running time for the study of 33 months.

In accordance with a previous study assessing local control of MSCC, the following patient characteristics will be recorded to allow adequate comparison with the historical control group:

* Age
* Gender
* Type of primary tumor (breast cancer vs. prostate cancer vs. myeloma/ lymphoma vs. lung cancer vs. other tumors)
* Interval from tumor diagnosis to MSCC (≤15 months vs. \>15 months)
* Number of involved vertebrae (1-2 vs. ≥3)
* Other bone metastases at the time of RT (no vs. yes)
* Visceral metastases at the time of RT (no vs. yes)
* Time developing motor deficits prior to RT (1-7 days vs. 8-14 days vs. \>14 days)
* Ambulatory status prior to RT (no vs. yes)
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (0-2 vs- 3-4)
* Indication for decompressive surgery of affected spinal areas

The patients of this study who received high-precision RT with 18x2.33 Gy for MSCC will be compared to a historical control group of patients with a favorable survival prognosis who were treated with 10x3 Gy of conventional RT. The historical control group will include data from 235 patients qualifying for the comparison with the prospectively collected data.

Data for the historical control group will be collected from an already existing anonymized database with previous study data documented in the European Union.

To be eligible for control group, patients fulfilling the same inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria as defined in the prospective study are considered. Furthermore, to be consistent with efficacy analysis of the study, patients of the historical control group must have received at least 80% of the planned RT dose.

Propensity score techniques will be applied to reduce confounding due to differences between the historical control group and the prospective trial data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Compression Due to Metastasis to Spine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Single arm study compared with a historical cohort.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High-precision RT

Study Arm: 18 x 2.33 Gy of high-precision RT in 3.5 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-precision RT

Intervention Type RADIATION

18 x 2.33 Gy of high-precision RT in 3.5 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High-precision RT

18 x 2.33 Gy of high-precision RT in 3.5 weeks

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Motor deficits of the lower extremities resulting from MSCC, which have persisted for no longer than 30 days
2. Confirmation of diagnosis by MR-imaging (computed tomography \[CT\] allowed)
3. Age 18 years or older
4. Written informed consent
5. Favorable survival prognosis (defined as 36-45 points on the survival score)
6. Capacity of the patient to contract

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous RT or surgery of the spinal areas affected by MSCC
2. Symptomatic brain tumor or symptomatic brain metastases
3. Metastases of the cervical spine only
4. Other severe neurological disorders
5. Pregnancy, Lactation
6. Clear indication for spinal surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof Dirk Rades

Chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Luebeck

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dirk Rades, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dep. of Radiation Oncology, Univ. of Lübeck and Univ. Medical Center S-H

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rades D, Hansen O, Jensen LH, Dziggel L, Staackmann C, Doemer C, Cacicedo J, Conde-Moreno AJ, Segedin B, Ciervide-Jurio R, Rubio-Rodriguez C, Perez-Romasanta LA, Alvarez-Gracia A, Dennis K, Ferrer-Albiach C, Navarro-Martin A, Lopez-Campos F, Jankarashvili N, Janssen S, Olbrich D, Hollander NH. Radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression with increased radiation doses (RAMSES-01): a prospective multicenter study. BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):1163. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6390-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31783816 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RAMSES-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spinal Cord Compression Re-Treat Study
NCT00974168 COMPLETED PHASE2