Effect of Transorbital Electrical STIMulation of Optic Nerve on Remyelination After an Acute Optic Neuritis

NCT ID: NCT04042363

Last Updated: 2019-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-10

Study Completion Date

2022-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In light of experimental models showing that neuronal electrical activity is crucial for the remyelination process, we hypothesize that maintenance of electrical axonal activity in the early stages of optic neuritis may promote myelin repair, limiting thereby axonal degeneration.

In humans, electrical stimulation of the optic nerve has been tested mainly in ischemic neuropathy and retinitis pigmentosa, which are both associated with severe axonal/retinal pathology and poor visual prognosis. In contrast, the inflammation of the optic nerve in optic neuritis is generally transient, with less severe axonal damage at the acute phase, which would allow for better efficacy of electrical stimulation as a strategy to promote remyelination and neuroprotection.In light of experimental models showing that neuronal electrical activity is crucial for the remyelination process, we hypothesize that maintenance of electrical axonal activity in the early stages of optic neuritis may promote myelin repair, limiting thereby axonal degeneration.

In humans, electrical stimulation of the optic nerve has been tested mainly in ischemic neuropathy and retinitis pigmentosa, which are both associated with severe axonal/retinal pathology and poor visual prognosis. In contrast, the inflammation of the optic nerve in optic neuritis is generally transient, with less severe axonal damage at the acute phase, which would allow for better efficacy of electrical stimulation as a strategy to promote remyelination and neuroprotection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, controlled, prospective, interventional, blinded trial which aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transorbital electrical nerve stimulation on remyelination and neuroprotection after an acute episode of retrobulbar optic neuritis in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Expected Explorations: The study is composed of 14 visits: a screening/inclusion visit with neurological and ophthalmological evaluation, electrophysiology, MRI and Magnetoencephalography (MEG), 10 transorbital electrical stimulation or sham stimulation visits and finally 3 follow-up visits and evaluations (neurological and ophthalmological). Patient's participation will last 49 weeks (inclusion visit and 48 weeks of follow-up). Participation of healthy volunteers will last one day.

MS patients diagnosed with an optic neuritis will be randomized either in the active arm (transorbital electrical stimulation of the optic nerve - 10 sessions during 2 consecutive weeks) or in the placebo arm (sham stimulation - 10 sessions during 2 consecutive weeks) Expected benefits: Electrical stimulation of the optic nerve after an acute episode of retrobulbar optic neuritis may promote remyelination in the optic nerve and a better long-term visual outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis Optic Neuritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Patients as well as ophthalmologists will be subject to the procedure of masking and will keep the blinding for the duration of the study. As a result, ophthalmologists examiners will not perform electrical stimulation sessions.

The persons in charge of the stimulation will be in "open label" and will ensure the inclusion, the follow-up of the patient throughout the study, the stimulation (SHAM or stimulation), the clinical and neurological examination as well as the collection of the treatments and the notification of the Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events (AE/SAE).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active Transorbital electrical stimulation

Transorbital electrical stimulation of the optic nerve - 10 sessions during 2 consecutive weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transorbital electrical stimulation (Eyetronic Next Wave 1.1)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Calibration phase: The patient will use a response button to indicate the threshold from which he feels a luminous sensation (phosphene). In a second step, he will use the same answer button to indicate the stimulation frequency from which the phosphenes become continuous.

Stimulation phase: From these 2 parameters (amplitude and frequency), the stimulation session will begin for a duration of approximately 40 to 50 minutes, the settings being dependent of the individual thresholds.

Sham Transorbital stimulation

Sham stimulation - 10 sessions during 2 consecutive weeks

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Transorbital electrical stimulation (Eyetronic Next Wave 1.1) - Sham stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The calibration phase is identical to the active stimulation. During the stimulation phase, the operator will manually interrupt the stimulation 60 seconds after the start of the session.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transorbital electrical stimulation (Eyetronic Next Wave 1.1)

Calibration phase: The patient will use a response button to indicate the threshold from which he feels a luminous sensation (phosphene). In a second step, he will use the same answer button to indicate the stimulation frequency from which the phosphenes become continuous.

Stimulation phase: From these 2 parameters (amplitude and frequency), the stimulation session will begin for a duration of approximately 40 to 50 minutes, the settings being dependent of the individual thresholds.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transorbital electrical stimulation (Eyetronic Next Wave 1.1) - Sham stimulation

The calibration phase is identical to the active stimulation. During the stimulation phase, the operator will manually interrupt the stimulation 60 seconds after the start of the session.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* For MS patients:
* Age between 18 and 60 years old.
* Relapsing Remitting MS (criteria of McDonald 2017) evolving for less than 10 years or Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS)-MS with criteria of spatial dissemination on MRI
* Subject presenting an acute unilateral episode of optic neuritis treated optimally (bolus of corticosteroids and plasma exchanges if considered necessary)
* Last medical treatment for optic neuritis received between 30 and 90 days before inclusion
* Visual acuity \<7/10 of the affected eye at the time of inclusion
* Social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme

For Healthy Volunteers:

* Age between 18 and 60 years old.
* No history of neurological or ophthalmological diseases
* Corrected visual acuity ≥ 8/10
* Scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme

Exclusion Criteria

For patients:

* Differential diagnosis of Optic neuritis:

i) Atypical acute optic neuritis (papillitis, severe papilledema, initial optic atrophy) ii) Optic neuromyelitis iii) Normal VEP during the inclusion visit iv) No detection of VEP during the inclusion visit
* Impossibility to perform MRI, MEG, or electrical stimulation:

Pacemaker or neurosensory stimulator or implantable defibrillator Clip on an aneurysm or clip on a vascular malformation of the brain Cochlear implants Ocular or cerebral ferromagnetic foreign bodies Metal prostheses or metal clips or splinters Ventriculoperitoneal neurosurgical bypass valves Permanent makeup of the eyelids or lips Black tattoo, important and close to the cranio-facial sphere. Copper Intrauterine Device Person with proven claustrophobia Epilepsy Brain tumor Intraocular pressure without specific treatment Hypertension without treatment Acute retinal hemorrhage Periorbital skin irritation Significant cognitive deficit Known gadolinium allergy

* Person with severe or uncontrolled symptoms of kidney, liver, hematological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary or cardiac disease or any uncontrolled intercurrent disease at the time of inclusion.
* Pregnant or breath-feeding woman.
* Refusal of the participant to be informed in case of fortuitous discoveries having a direct impact on his health and requiring appropriate care
* person under judicial protection or deprived of liberty

For healthy volunteers:

* Contraindication to MRI or MEG
* Person with severe or uncontrolled symptoms of kidney, liver, hematological disease, gastrointestinal, pulmonary or cardiac disease or any uncontrolled intercurrent pathology at the time of inclusion.
* Pregnant or breath-feeding woman.
* Refusal of the participant to be informed in case of fortuitous discoveries having a direct impact on his health and requiring appropriate care
* Person under the protection of justice or deprived of liberty
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondation ARSEP

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

APHP

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Céline Louapre

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epiniere, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Paris

Saddek Mohand-Said

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle epiniere - Hopital Pitie Salpetriere

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hayet Serhane

Role: CONTACT

+33 140021144

Celine Louapre

Role: CONTACT

+ 33 1 42 16 57 66

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michel PAQUES, PU-PH

Role: primary

01 40 02 14 15

Celine Louapre

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-A03138-47

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P18-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pilot Study of TENS for Ocular Pain
NCT05531643 COMPLETED NA
Feasibility of Stimulating the Visual Cortex in Blind
NCT02747589 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA