Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-27
2023-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Total excision of the rectum and mesorectum (TME) This is the classic attitude with a low risk of local recurrence (5%) but functional complications occur in 25 to 60% of cases
2. A simple monitoring ("Watch and Wait") by MRI, biopsy, rectoscopy ... This strategy was initially proposed to elderly patients considered inoperable but it has also been proposed in younger patients, operable, with a view to decreasing morbidity and sequelae. This attitude poses a likely overall risk of local recidivism. However, this higher risk of recurrence may be the result of imperfect identification of ypT0N0 patients.
3. Local excision of the post-radiation scar also called closure lumpectomy with pathological analysis and possible secondary TME if no complete response. This last attitude has the advantage of allowing an anatomopathological verification of the treated lesion and to complete the treatment if necessary. In the case of ypT0 the local recurrence rate is low and in this case it is possible to consider rectal savings.
The choice of the last two attitudes is therefore based on the correct identification of patients in complete response. The performance of the diagnosis of no complete response after radiochemotherapy is therefore fundamental and is the subject of this project wich consist of comparing he diagnostic performance for the identification of a complete lack of response \[18F\] -FDG-PET / MRI ypT0N0 to that of the classic attitude (MRI) 6 to 9 weeks after the end of a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment of low and mid-rectal cancers in patients in whom clinical and endoscopic examination favor a complete response.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
FDG - PET / MRI in Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT03846882
18FFDG PET/CT for Early Evaluation of Chemotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Colic Adenocarcinoma
NCT05531045
Rectal Cancer: Local Staging, Re-staging and Assessment of Lymph Nodes Using Pet-Ct, CT-Perfusion and 3T MRI
NCT01525056
Treatment Monitoring of Advanced Colorectal Cancer With 18F-FDG PET/CT
NCT00823810
Gene Expression and FDG PET/MRI in Evaluating Treatment Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Before Surgery
NCT02112162
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In a second step the complete examination associating the merged MRI and PET sequences will be reinterpreted. A new evaluation of the response will be done. The results of the MRI and PET MRI will be read without the gold standard, which will be available after the intervention. The results of this second analysis will not be transmitted to the Multidisciplinary Concertation Meeting and will not influence the management. The patients will then be operated. The histological stage ypTN will be established on the operative specimen.
Thus all patients will have the 2 tests under study (MRI and \[18F\] -FDG-PET / MRI, as well as the gold standard (pathological analysis) .These results will meet the main objective evaluation of the diagnostic performances by comparing them with the results of the gold standard (anatomopathological analysis of the operative specimen)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patient with rectal cancer
Patient with rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy with clinical complete response
PET-MRI
Hybrid PET / MRI machine for simultaneous acquisition of functional and molecular information of different natures coupled with the high anatomical resolution of MRI.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PET-MRI
Hybrid PET / MRI machine for simultaneous acquisition of functional and molecular information of different natures coupled with the high anatomical resolution of MRI.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a rectal cancer and who had neo-adjuvant treatment by radio-chemotherapy
* Patients for whom the clinical and endoscopic examination realised 6 at 9 weeks after the end o the RCT is in favour of a complete response (normal digital rectal exam, endoscopic complete disappearance of the lesion or the presence of scar and whitish plane of less than 2 cm)
* Patients who have signed a consent formulary after a loyal and fair information
* Patients affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary or legal) outside AME
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with a contraindication to PET: non controlled diabet glycemia \> 200 mh/dL, pregnancy
* Hypersensibility to 18-FDG or others contrast products
* Patients who would require abdominoperineal amputation
* Patients with many comorbidities contraindicating MTCT because these patients do not match the target population (in addition they currently represent the rare indications of closure lumpectomy)
* Patients under guardianship or reinforced curators or deprived of liberty.
* Pregnant or childbearing women without effective contraception (a plasma βHCG test will be performed in this case the day before PET / MRI)
* Participation in another interventional research without the agreement of the physician following the patient for research
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
LUCIDARME Olivier, PU-PH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AP-HP Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière - Radiology Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P170939J
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.