Rectal Cancer Response Hybrid Imaging Assessement

NCT ID: NCT04036643

Last Updated: 2020-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-27

Study Completion Date

2023-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rectal cancer represents 14,000 new cases a year in France. At diagnosis, 70% of patients have a locally advanced tumors T3-T4 and / or N + evaluated mainly by rectal MRI. These patients will benefit from a neo-adjuvant treatment by radio-chemotherapy. The complete histologic response rate (ypT0N0) after this neo-adjuvant treatment ranged from 15 to 27% and improved recurrence-free survival, remotely relapse-free survival, overall survival, and decreased local recurrence rate. In the case of full response diagnosis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 3 theoretical solutions exist:

1. Total excision of the rectum and mesorectum (TME) This is the classic attitude with a low risk of local recurrence (5%) but functional complications occur in 25 to 60% of cases
2. A simple monitoring ("Watch and Wait") by MRI, biopsy, rectoscopy ... This strategy was initially proposed to elderly patients considered inoperable but it has also been proposed in younger patients, operable, with a view to decreasing morbidity and sequelae. This attitude poses a likely overall risk of local recidivism. However, this higher risk of recurrence may be the result of imperfect identification of ypT0N0 patients.
3. Local excision of the post-radiation scar also called closure lumpectomy with pathological analysis and possible secondary TME if no complete response. This last attitude has the advantage of allowing an anatomopathological verification of the treated lesion and to complete the treatment if necessary. In the case of ypT0 the local recurrence rate is low and in this case it is possible to consider rectal savings.

The choice of the last two attitudes is therefore based on the correct identification of patients in complete response. The performance of the diagnosis of no complete response after radiochemotherapy is therefore fundamental and is the subject of this project wich consist of comparing he diagnostic performance for the identification of a complete lack of response \[18F\] -FDG-PET / MRI ypT0N0 to that of the classic attitude (MRI) 6 to 9 weeks after the end of a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment of low and mid-rectal cancers in patients in whom clinical and endoscopic examination favor a complete response.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The MRI examination to evaluate the response to routine Radio-Chemotherapy Neoadjuvant (RCT) will be replaced by an MRI-PET scan in all patients included. Firstly, only the MRI portion of the examination will be interpreted (sequences identical to that performed in conventional MRI), without the PET part of the examination. An evaluation of the answer will be done. The results of the MRI will be transmitted to the surgeon in accordance with the conventional attitude of treatment of rectal cancer treated with RCT.

In a second step the complete examination associating the merged MRI and PET sequences will be reinterpreted. A new evaluation of the response will be done. The results of the MRI and PET MRI will be read without the gold standard, which will be available after the intervention. The results of this second analysis will not be transmitted to the Multidisciplinary Concertation Meeting and will not influence the management. The patients will then be operated. The histological stage ypTN will be established on the operative specimen.

Thus all patients will have the 2 tests under study (MRI and \[18F\] -FDG-PET / MRI, as well as the gold standard (pathological analysis) .These results will meet the main objective evaluation of the diagnostic performances by comparing them with the results of the gold standard (anatomopathological analysis of the operative specimen)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

All patient with rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemo radiation therapy with clinical complete response
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

patient with rectal cancer

Patient with rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy with clinical complete response

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PET-MRI

Intervention Type RADIATION

Hybrid PET / MRI machine for simultaneous acquisition of functional and molecular information of different natures coupled with the high anatomical resolution of MRI.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PET-MRI

Hybrid PET / MRI machine for simultaneous acquisition of functional and molecular information of different natures coupled with the high anatomical resolution of MRI.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients age ≥18 years
* Patients with a rectal cancer and who had neo-adjuvant treatment by radio-chemotherapy
* Patients for whom the clinical and endoscopic examination realised 6 at 9 weeks after the end o the RCT is in favour of a complete response (normal digital rectal exam, endoscopic complete disappearance of the lesion or the presence of scar and whitish plane of less than 2 cm)
* Patients who have signed a consent formulary after a loyal and fair information
* Patients affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary or legal) outside AME

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a contraindication to MRI: pacemaker, defibrillator, intraocular metallic foreign body, ferromagnetic implant, claustrophobia
* Patient with a contraindication to PET: non controlled diabet glycemia \> 200 mh/dL, pregnancy
* Hypersensibility to 18-FDG or others contrast products
* Patients who would require abdominoperineal amputation
* Patients with many comorbidities contraindicating MTCT because these patients do not match the target population (in addition they currently represent the rare indications of closure lumpectomy)
* Patients under guardianship or reinforced curators or deprived of liberty.
* Pregnant or childbearing women without effective contraception (a plasma βHCG test will be performed in this case the day before PET / MRI)
* Participation in another interventional research without the agreement of the physician following the patient for research
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

LUCIDARME Olivier, PU-PH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AP-HP Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière - Radiology Department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

LUCIDARME Olivier, PU-PH

Role: CONTACT

33142176322

WAGNER Mathilde, PH

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

LUCIDARME Olivier, PU-PH

Role: primary

33142176322

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P170939J

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PET and MRI Imaging of Brain Tumors Using [18F]PARPi
NCT04173104 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1