The Revitalize Study in Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
NCT ID: NCT04018092
Last Updated: 2025-10-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
168 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-08-12
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Methodology Issues in a Tailored Light Treatment for Persons With Dementia - Aim 2
NCT05837819
Effect of Therapeutic Light on Sleep, Circadian Rhythm, and Global Function in Women With Alzheimer's
NCT02502045
Far Infrared Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease
NCT00599469
Effects of Light-therapy in Alzheimer's Disease
NCT02686190
Preventing Alzheimer's With Cognitive Training
NCT03848312
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
The MedX and Vielight devices used for delivery of active and sham NIR stimulation are identical in all respects regarding design, warmth and operation, except that no stimulation is delivered by the sham devices. Because NIR light is invisible, participants will not be able to discern if receiving active or sham stimulation. The participants, interventionists, and outcome assessors will be blinded to the participants' intervention status: Active vs Sham. At completion of the study, all participants will receive a Placebo Control Questionnaire that asks questions pertaining to what group the participant had been assigned. This data will be examined to determine the effectiveness of blinding.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active NIR-PBM
This condition involves baseline testing, 12 weeks of Near Infrared-Photobiomodulation (NIR-PBM), and post-intervention testing. Cognitive and neuroimaging outcomes are obtained before and after the intervention. The intervention consists of a) 16 laboratory sessions of NIR-PBM given 3 times/week for 2 weeks and then once weekly for 10 weeks and b) 44 home sessions of stimulation delivered intranasally. During each lab session, NIR light is delivered via placement of six MedX LED superluminous diode clusters over the scalp for a total of 40 minutes. Concurrently, two 810 Vielight intranasal devices are placed in each nostril for 25 min of total dose per nostril. During lab sessions, participants sit in front of a monitor and view nature documentaries (BBC Life series). This is done to standardize behavior during the intervention sessions. For home sessions, participants use a standalone 810 intranasal device only on weekdays when not completing a lab session.
Active NIR-PBM
Near infrared light was delivered to the head using two MedX Rehab Console systems (MedX Health, 1116). Each MedX console included a control unit and 3 superluminous light emitting diode (LED) clusters. Each LED cluster (3MedX MCT502) consisted of 52 near infrared diodes and 9 visible red diodes. The 9 red diodes were deactivated. The energy delivered by each cluster was 1 joule \[J\]/cm2 in 45 sec at treatment wavelength of 870 nm per each 20 min. The LED cluster has an irradiance of 22.2 mW/cm2, treats an area of 22.48 cm2, with an energy density of 26.64/cm2 per cluster (total energy of 599J/cluster). During each session, the 6 clusters were arrayed on the scalp in 2 configurations, 20 minutes per array. Each configuration targeted 6 transcranial sites, guided by the 10-20 system, for a total of 12 sites during the 40-min session. Total energy delivered was 599J/cluster X 12 sites = 7188J. Intranasal stimulation was delivered using..
Sham NIR-PBM
Participants randomized to the Sham control group will undergo identical procedures as the Active group. The only difference is that the "sham" NIR devices are modified not to deliver stimulation. Because NIR is invisible, participants are unable to detect whether NIR is being delivered.
Sham NIR-PBM
The MedX sham and Vielight interventions device are identical in all respects to the active device, except that the MedX console and diode clusters were modified to NOT deliver NIR light when turned on. The sham MedX devices were modified to deliver 'warmth', similar to that of the active devices. As with the active condition, a total of six sham interventions were given over a 12-week period, following the identical procedures described in the active condition
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active NIR-PBM
Near infrared light was delivered to the head using two MedX Rehab Console systems (MedX Health, 1116). Each MedX console included a control unit and 3 superluminous light emitting diode (LED) clusters. Each LED cluster (3MedX MCT502) consisted of 52 near infrared diodes and 9 visible red diodes. The 9 red diodes were deactivated. The energy delivered by each cluster was 1 joule \[J\]/cm2 in 45 sec at treatment wavelength of 870 nm per each 20 min. The LED cluster has an irradiance of 22.2 mW/cm2, treats an area of 22.48 cm2, with an energy density of 26.64/cm2 per cluster (total energy of 599J/cluster). During each session, the 6 clusters were arrayed on the scalp in 2 configurations, 20 minutes per array. Each configuration targeted 6 transcranial sites, guided by the 10-20 system, for a total of 12 sites during the 40-min session. Total energy delivered was 599J/cluster X 12 sites = 7188J. Intranasal stimulation was delivered using..
Sham NIR-PBM
The MedX sham and Vielight interventions device are identical in all respects to the active device, except that the MedX console and diode clusters were modified to NOT deliver NIR light when turned on. The sham MedX devices were modified to deliver 'warmth', similar to that of the active devices. As with the active condition, a total of six sham interventions were given over a 12-week period, following the identical procedures described in the active condition
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjective report of cognitive complaints with scores \>16 on the Cognitive Change Index (CCI-20)
* No evidence of dementia or mild cognitive impairment based on cognitive screening (i.e., Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score within normal limits for age, education and sex using the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS) norms.
* No psychometric evidence of cognitive impairment based on performance on the Neuropsychological Battery from the NACC Unified Data Set, version 3. Scores on these measures cannot be lower than 5th percentile below normative values based on age, education, and gender.
* Reading at \> 8th grade level based on the reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test- IV.
* Global Clinic Dementia Rating (CDR) score must be 0
* Family history of dementia/probable Alzheimer's disease in first degree relative (parents, children, siblings)
* Willingness to be randomized to Sham or Active Intervention
* Can devote 12 weeks to the intervention with additional time for pre and post testing
* Normal functional behavior in terms of daily activities, based on the Functional Activities Scale
* Able to perform cognitive and emotion measures on a computer
* In line with recommendations of the Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) task force an informant must be available for two reasons: a) to provide information about the participant's complaints using the informant version of the CCI-20, and b) to corroborate normal IADL's on the Functional Activity Questionnaire.
Exclusion Criteria
* English as a second language
* Inability to undergo brain imaging due to claustrophobia or implants such as pacemakers, heart valves, brain aneurysm clips, orthodontics, non-removable body jewelry, or shrapnel containing ferromagnetic metal
* Previous major strokes or other known significant brain abnormalities or diseases affecting the brain and/or cognition (e.g.,Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, seizure disorder, brain surgery, moderate traumatic brain injury (TB)I, Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Behavior Sleep Disorder, untreated sleep apnea, etc.)
* Unstable and uncontrolled medical conditions (metastatic cancer, HIV, moderate-severe kidney disease, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, severe cardiac disease, etc.). No current cancer diagnosis.
* Current or past history of major psychiatric disturbance including schizophrenia, or active psychosis, bipolar disorder, current major depressive episode, current alcohol or substance abuse or history thereof within the past six months.
* Use of antipsychotics, sedatives, or other medications with significant anticholinergic properties (due to potential influence on memory)
* Use of prescribed 'memory enhancing' medications such as Aricept or Namenda
* Use of photo-sensitive medications such as steroids or retin-A within 15 days of the study intervention.
* Previous participation in a cognitive training study within the last 6 months or current involvement in another study involving cognitive, physical or other intervention at the time of participation
65 Years
89 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Arizona
OTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dawn Bowers, Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida
Steve DeKosky, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida
Gene Alexander, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Arizona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States
University of Florida McKnight Brain Institute
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.