International Post PCI FFR Registry

NCT ID: NCT04012281

Last Updated: 2019-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2228 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-17

Study Completion Date

2019-03-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The prognostic factors after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been comprehensively investigated. The investigators sought to develop a risk model to predict future clinical events after PCI using contemporary coronary stents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment strategy for coronary artery disease (CAD). With the presence of myocardial ischemia, PCI reduces the risks of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and revascularization compared to medical therapy. However, the risk of future clinical events still remain high and about 10% of patients experienced further cardiovascular events after PCI. There are several factors that are associated with these poor outcomes. Known patient-related risk factors are diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, left ventricular dysfunction, previous MI and presentation with the acute coronary syndrome. Procedure-related factors, such as stent underexpension, malapposition, edge dissection, the number of the used stent and total stent length, are also related to poor prognosis after PCI. Recent studies reported that fractional flow reserve (FFR) after coronary stenting, or post PCI FFR, was associated with future clinical outcomes after PCI and low post PCI FFR value was associated with procedural factors. However, all of these risk factors were identified in individual studies there have been no studies that comprehensively evaluated these risk factors. Therefore, the investigators sought to investigate the risk predictors of future clinical events in patients after PCI and develop a risk model, incorporating clinical, angiographic, and physiologic factors, to predict the clinical events after PCI using contemporary coronary stents.

The study population of this study is from the International Post PCI FFR Registry, which included 4 different registries from Korea, China, and Japan. All patients in this registry are available with clinical, angiographic and physiologic data and used 2nd generation drug-eluting stent (DES) for PCI. The COE-PERSPECTIVE registry (NCT01873560) was designed to evaluate the clinical relevance of post PCI FFR from 9 hospitals in Korea and Japan and enrolled a total of 835 patients available post PCI FFR value after angiographically successful PCI between May 2013 and December 2016. The 3V-FFR-FRIENDS registry (NCT01621438) enrolled a total of 1,136 patients (3,298 vessels) who underwent 3-vessel FFR measurements from 12 centers in Korea, Japan, and China between November 2011 and March 2014. Among them, 266 patients with 337 vessels who measure post PCI FFR values were included in this international registry. The DKCRUSH VII registry (ChiCTR-PRCH-12001976) enrolled a total of 1,476 patients from 9 hospitals (5 hospitals in China, 2 hospitals in the United States, 1 hospital in Asia and 1 hospital in European country) between May 2012 and September 2013 to evaluate the prognostic value of post PCI FFR on patients' future outcome. For this international registry, 780 patients with 794 vessels from Nanjing First Hospital in China, who were available with whole clinical, angiographic and physiologic data, were included in this registry. Last, the Institutional registry of Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan included 347 patients (357 vessels) who underwent PCI and final post-PCI FFR measurement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Post PCI state

The study population of this study underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) with 2nd generation drug-eluting stent (DES) and measured fractional flow reserve after PCI

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

PCI was performed using 2nd generation DES

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PCI was performed using 2nd generation DES

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who underwent PCI and post-PCI FFR measurements after angiographically successful stent implantation (residual stenosis \< 20% by visual estimation)
* Patients who provided informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Post-PCI TIMI flow of \< 3
* Depressed left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction \< 30%)
* Culprit lesion for acute coronary syndrome
* Graft vessel
* Collateral feeder
* In-stent stenosis
* Primary myocardial or valvular heart disease
* Patients with life expectancy \< 2 years.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ulsan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Busan Veterans General Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Samsung Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sejong General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tokyo Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gifu Heart Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Inje University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bon-Kwon Koo

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Joon Hyung Doh, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Inje University

Shao-Liang Chen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Tsunekazu Kakuta, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital

Joo Myung Lee, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Samsung Medical Center

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30165437 (View on PubMed)

Fearon WF, Nishi T, De Bruyne B, Boothroyd DB, Barbato E, Tonino P, Juni P, Pijls NHJ, Hlatky MA; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation). Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):480-487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29097450 (View on PubMed)

Hwang D, Lee JM, Lee HJ, Kim SH, Nam CW, Hahn JY, Shin ES, Matsuo A, Tanaka N, Matsuo H, Lee SY, Doh JH, Koo BK. Influence of target vessel on prognostic relevance of fractional flow reserve after coronary stenting. EuroIntervention. 2019 Aug 29;15(5):457-464. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00913.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30561367 (View on PubMed)

Li SJ, Ge Z, Kan J, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Kwan TW, Santoso T, Yang S, Sheiban I, Qian XS, Tian NL, Rab TS, Tao L, Chen SL. Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 22;10(10):986-995. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28456699 (View on PubMed)

Rimac G, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Ikeno F, Matsuo H, Piroth Z, Costerousse O, Bertrand OF. Clinical value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2017 Jan;183:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27979031 (View on PubMed)

van Zandvoort LJC, Masdjedi K, Witberg K, Ligthart J, Tovar Forero MN, Diletti R, Lemmert ME, Wilschut J, de Jaegere PPT, Boersma E, Zijlstra F, Van Mieghem NM, Daemen J. Explanation of Postprocedural Fractional Flow Reserve Below 0.85. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007030. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007030.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30732469 (View on PubMed)

Zhang J, Hwang D, Yang S, Kim CH, Lee JM, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Hoshino M, Hamaya R, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Li X, Ge Z, Chen SL, Kakuta T, Koo BK. Differential Prognostic Implications of Pre- and Post-Stent Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Korean Circ J. 2022 Jan;52(1):47-59. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0128. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34877828 (View on PubMed)

Lee JM, Hwang D, Choi KH, Lee HJ, Song YB, Cho YK, Nam CW, Hahn JY, Shin ES, Doh JH, Hoshino M, Hamaya R, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Li X, Ge Z, Chen SL, Kakuta T, Koo BK. Prognostic Impact of Residual Anatomic Disease Burden After Functionally Complete Revascularization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009232. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009232. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32895005 (View on PubMed)

Hwang D, Lee JM, Yang S, Chang M, Zhang J, Choi KH, Kim CH, Nam CW, Shin ES, Kwak JJ, Doh JH, Hoshino M, Hamaya R, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Li X, Ge Z, Chen SL, Kakuta T, Koo BK. Role of Post-Stent Physiological Assessment in a Risk Prediction Model After Coronary Stent Implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 27;13(14):1639-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.041.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32703590 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1906-152-1044

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.