Evaluation of Perineural Catheterization Practices in Postoperative Orthopedic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04011839
Last Updated: 2025-05-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
7 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-07
2022-06-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main disadvantage of these techniques is that they can drive a more or less deep motor block that slows down the rehabilitation process. This disadvantage could be prevented (or minimized) by adapting the protocol for administering local anesthetics or by changing molecules (levobupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml instead of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml). There is no literature comparing the effectiveness of the sensory block and its impact on the motor block according to the administration protocol and/or the type of local anesthetics.
The main judgement criterion of such a study could be a composite criterion crossing the quality of the sensory block and the depth of the motor blockades, the ideal being to have a perfect sensory block without any motor block.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Approach to Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block for Orthopedic Procedures in Day Surgery With Two Different Techniques
NCT02029404
Evaluation of Efficacy of Lumbar Plexus Bloc After Hip Surgery
NCT00150865
Preventing Chronic Post Surgical Pain After Limb Surgery
NCT02630498
Remote Controlled Analgesia on Patient Experience
NCT02720965
Leg Amputation and Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block
NCT00427947
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Levobupivacaïne
Use of Levobupivacaïne instead ropivacaïne
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA score 1 to 4
* Scheduled orthopaedic surgery
* consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergency situation
* Contraindications to local anaesthesia
* Patient refusal
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de NIMES
Nîmes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Local/2018/JL-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.