Supine Exercise in Hepatopulmonary Syndrome Patients With Orthodeoxia
NCT ID: NCT04004104
Last Updated: 2023-05-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-24
2024-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Overall, HPS patients tend to experience hypoxemia and exercise limitation. Exercise limitation impacts quality of life, incidence and severity of comorbid conditions, and in those who are liver transplant candidates, low exercise tolerance deleteriously impacts transplant outcomes. Accordingly, a strategy that enables patients to exercise more often and/or for longer periods would offer direct benefits to patients with HPS, and if employed as part of an exercise program, could also improve exercise capacity, and thus, liver transplant outcomes.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of supine, compared to upright position on exercise in patients with HPS and orthodeoxia. We hypothesize that these patients will be able to exercise for longer in the supine compared to the upright position, given improved oxygen levels when supine.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hepatopulmonary Syndrome and Postoperative Complications After Liver Transplantation : A Case-control Study
NCT03092401
Bosentan for Treatment of Hepatopulmonary Syndrome in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis
NCT01518595
Home-based Bimodal Lifestyle Intervention in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis Awaiting Orthotopic Liver Transplantation
NCT05853484
Molecular Mechanism of Exercise in Cirrhosis
NCT05982769
To Determine the Role of Prokinetics in Feed Intolerance in Critically Ill Cirrhosis
NCT02528760
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The exercise will be performed at a constant work rate, individualized for each participant. Peak work rate will be calculated using results from the most recent room air 6-minute walk test (6MWT), within the past 6 months. The equation used to estimate peak work rate is: Peak Work Rate = 0.168 x 6MWD (m) - 4.085 (ref Kozu Respirology 2010). The individualized constant work rate will be set at 70-80% of this estimated peak work rate.
The main stopping criterion will be the point at which, after standardized encouragement, the subject is unable to continue because of symptoms (i.e. patient does not wish to continue or cannot maintain a minimum peddling frequency of 40 rpm for ≥ 10 seconds). This is defined as the "tolerable limit" (tLIM). Additional safety-related stopping criteria will include: the appearance of life-threatening arrhythmias, a drop in systolic blood pressure by ≥ 10 mm Hg from baseline, or a desaturation below a set point for ≥ 30 s. The set saturation point will be chosen individually for each patient, as the lower of: 80% or the lowest saturation seen on room air 6MWT.
Exercise tests in each position, for each subject, will be standardized with respect to the proper seat adjustment relative to leg length and pedaling cadence (50-60 rpm). Inspiratory capacity will be measured before and after the exercise maneuver.
The cycle ergometer resistance will be set to the pre-determined constant work rate, as described above. There will be continuous monitoring of saturation, ECG, gas exchange, blood pressure, and subjective dyspnea/leg fatigue (Borg scale), with standardized verbal encouragement throughout. Participants will be asked to bring running shoes and comfortable exercise clothes, ensure that they have eaten before the test, to take all usual medications, and to avoid major exercise for 24 hours before the test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control - Upright Exercise
Participants will perform upright exercise on a cycle ergometer. The opposite test will be completed within 4 weeks.
Upright Exercise
Exercise is generally performed in the upright position.
Intervention - Supine Exercise
Participants will perform supine exercise on a cycle ergometer. The opposite test will be completed within 4 weeks.
Supine Exercise
Since HPS patients with orthodeoxia experience an improvement in their symptoms and oxygen levels when supine, the intervention will involve them performing exercise in the supine position.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Upright Exercise
Exercise is generally performed in the upright position.
Supine Exercise
Since HPS patients with orthodeoxia experience an improvement in their symptoms and oxygen levels when supine, the intervention will involve them performing exercise in the supine position.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Presence of orthodeoxia (PaO2 decrease by \>4 mmHg when patient moves from supine to upright position).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Significant obstructive ventilatory impairment (FEV1/FVC ratio \< 0.65) (FEV=forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC=forced vital capacity)
3. Known significant coronary artery disease;
4. Significant neurologic, orthopedic or rheumatological disorders preventing the use of a cycle ergometer;
5. Other absolute contraindications to submaximal tests (uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia with hemodynamic compromise, symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, decompensated heart failure and acute cardiopulmonary illness);
6. Moderate or severe ascites.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Samir Gupta, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinician-Scientist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Parikh H, Lui E, Faughnan ME, Al-Hesayen A, Segovia S, Gupta S. Supine vs upright exercise in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome and orthodeoxia: study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 9;22(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05633-7.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Peak work rate estimated from 6-minute walk distance.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-127
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.