Episealer® Knee System IDE Clinical Study

NCT ID: NCT04000659

Last Updated: 2024-07-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-18

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is a randomized, prospective, multicenter, controlled clinical trial of the Episealer Knee System. The Episealer Knee System is intended for subjects with up to two focal femoral knee chondral or osteochondral lesion that is causing pain and/or disability and requires surgical treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of the Episealer Knee System (Episealer Trochlea Solo, Episealer Femoral Twin, and Episealer Condyle Solo) compared to microfracture (with or without debridement) in a group of subjects that require repair of up to 2 focal femoral chondral or osteochondral lesions in the knee.

Clinical success will be analyzed via subject reported outcomes to measure function and pain improvements as compared to baseline, incidence of secondary surgical interventions for the treated knee, absence of subsidence or migration through radiographic assessment, and assessment of weight-bearing status.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Degenerative Lesion of Articular Cartilage of Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A total of 180 subjects will be enrolled and randomized using a 2:1 ratio (Episealer: Microfracture). Within each site, subjects will be randomized into one of the two study arms using a blocked randomization scheme with varying block sizes.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
In this investigation, neither the investigator nor the subject can be blinded to the treatment group assignment due to the implant's distinctive form that can be detected on radiographs; however, the randomization assignment will not be disclosed to the subject until after surgery is performed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Episealer Knee System

The experimental arm will comprise of subjects that will be treated with the Episealer Knee System.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Episealer Knee System

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Episealer Knee System is comprised of individualized endoprosthetic resurfacing implants and implantation tools (Episealer Toolkit). The implants are designed to replace the articulating surface which has been damaged due to femoral knee chondral and osteochondral defects.

Microfracture

The control arm will comprise of subjects that will receive a Microfracture surgery.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Microfracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Microfracture is a minimally invasive surgical technique developed to repair defects in articular cartilage and reduce pain in the knee joint. Microfracture techniques are described in the orthopedic literature and are performed arthroscopically.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Episealer Knee System

The Episealer Knee System is comprised of individualized endoprosthetic resurfacing implants and implantation tools (Episealer Toolkit). The implants are designed to replace the articulating surface which has been damaged due to femoral knee chondral and osteochondral defects.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Microfracture

Microfracture is a minimally invasive surgical technique developed to repair defects in articular cartilage and reduce pain in the knee joint. Microfracture techniques are described in the orthopedic literature and are performed arthroscopically.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Be ≥ 30 years and ≤ 70 years.
2. Have up to 2 symptomatic femoral chondral or osteochondral defects in the index knee on the medial or lateral femoral condyles or the knee trochlea area, which are:

1. ICRS Grade 2, 3 or Grade 4
2. Each suitable for treatment with 1 Episealer device NOTE: Additional femoral cartilage lesions which, in the opinion of the investigator, are asymptomatic and free from underlying bone lesions (e.g., bone edema) will not be treated.
3. Have focal articular defect(s) each with a cartilage lesion area ≥ 1.5 cm2 and ≤ 7.0 cm2.

1. Subjects with up to two defects ≥ 1.5 cm2 and ≤ 4.0 cm2, that are surrounded by adequate circumferential cartilage as determined by the investigator, will be randomized.
2. Subjects with at least one defect \> 4.0 cm2 and ≤ 7.0 cm2, with adequate bony support as determined by the investigator, will not be randomized, and will receive the Episealer device.
4. Have screening scores that meet the following criteria:

1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of the index knee of ≥ 40 mm
2. KOOS Overall Score of ≤ 60
5. Have experienced knee pain symptoms and undergone prior non-surgical management (e.g., physical therapy, bracing, HA injections) for at least 4 weeks prior to being considered for the study.
6. Be able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate and have signed an Informed Consent Form specific to this study.
7. Be willing and able to comply with all study procedures including all pre-operative, post-operative, and rehabilitation requirements.

If female and of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test prior to the surgical procedure and no intention of becoming pregnant in the next 24 months.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following pre-operative screening criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

1. Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 37 kg/m2.
2. Have an ICRS Grade 3 or 4 tibial lesion of any size, or an ICRS Grade 4 patella lesion/fissure ≥ 2.0 mm in width in the index knee.
3. Have malalignment of \>8 degrees varus or valgus in the index knee based on standard AP x-rays.
4. Have deficits in flexion or extension of \>10 degrees in the index knee as compared to the contralateral knee.
5. Have an existing prosthesis in the index knee compartment or opposing joint surface.
6. Have joint instability in the index knee due to soft tissue or muscular insufficiency.
7. Have a vascular insufficiency at the lesion site that will impair successful microfracture (e.g., avascular necrosis/osteonecrosis, osteochondritis dissecans). (NOTE: This exclusion will not apply to patients with lesions between 4.0-7.0 cm2 who will not undergo randomization and will be treated in the Episealer-only arm).
8. Have inadequate bone stock underlying the lesion site, in the opinion of the investigator.
9. Have any condition, therapy, or medication that may impair bone healing or prevent adequate implant fixation (e.g., osteoporosis).
10. Have a diagnosis of a concomitant knee injury, which in the opinion of the investigator, may confound assessment of the index knee.
11. Have any meniscus tears or defects that require resection of more than 1/3 of the meniscus in the compartment to be treated (i.e., medial meniscus when medial femoral compartment is being treated; lateral meniscus when lateral femoral compartment is being treated).
12. Have a contralateral knee with symptomatic cartilage, meniscal, or ligamentous lesions; generalized osteoarthritis, or any condition that requires surgery, which in the opinion of the investigator, may confound assessment of the index knee, or any condition that requires surgery.
13. Have any condition that is unrelated to the index knee and significantly impairs walking ability (e.g., spinal stenosis, sciatica).
14. Have undergone previous treatment with autograft or allograft transfer, synthetic plugs, or microfracture in the index knee within 6 months of screening. (NOTE: Subjects who have undergone debridement at any point in the past are not excluded).
15. Have a loss of joint space on standing radiographs (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade ≥3) in the index knee.
16. Have an active systemic infection, or an active local infection in or near the index knee, or a previous history of joint infection.
17. Have a history of rheumatoid arthritis.
18. Have known allergies to any of the materials used in the implant (i.e., Cobalt-Chrome alloy and Titanium).
19. Have a contraindication to MRI (e.g., implanted pacemaker, metallic cardiac valve(s), magnetic material such as surgical clips, stent, implanted electronic infusion pumps or any other condition that would prevent the subject from undergoing an MRI).
20. Have a known immunodeficiency including subjects who are receiving or have received corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, immunostimulating agents or radiation therapy within 6 months prior to surgery.
21. Are participating in another clinical investigation for which they received an investigational product (including, but not limited to, a drug or vaccine) within the last 60 days or report the intention to participate in another clinical investigation during the course of the study
22. Are currently abusing drugs or alcohol or have a history of the same within the last 6 months.
23. Have any mental or psychological disorder that would impair their ability to complete the study questionnaires.
24. Are currently breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed any time during the course of the study.
25. Are currently a prisoner.
26. Have significant comorbidities or conditions associated with high-risk for surgical or anesthetic survival (e.g., renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, unstable cardiac disease, poorly controlled diabetes, immunosuppression, etc.).
27. Have any medical condition or other circumstances, in the judgment of the investigator, that might interfere with the ability to return for follow-up visits, including any systemic illness, neuromuscular, neurosensory, or musculoskeletal deficiency that would render the subject unable to perform appropriate post-operative rehabilitation.
28. Have any condition which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude adequate evaluation of the device's safety and performance.


Subjects who meet any of the following intra-operative screening criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

1. Have any meniscus tears or defects that require resection of more than 1/3 of the meniscus in the compartment to be treated (i.e., medial meniscus when medial femoral compartment is being treated; lateral meniscus when lateral femoral compartment is being treated).
2. Have chondrosis of the non-operative patellofemoral compartment, contralateral compartment or medial or lateral proximal tibia greater than Outerbridge Grade 2.
3. Have an index lesion on the articular surface that lacks adequate circumferential cartilage as determined by the investigator (NOTE: This exclusion applies only to patients randomized to the microfracture arm.)

Applicable to Investigational Group Only
4. Have a defect undergoing treatment that cannot be adequately covered by the Episealer device based on intra-operative measurements.

Have bone quality which, in the judgment of the surgeon, would prevent satisfactory fixation of the investigational device.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MCRA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Episurf Medical Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katarina Flodström

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Episurf Medical Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Physicians Research Group

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Horizon Clinical Research

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Plancher Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Helios Clinical Research

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

North Texas Medical Research Institute

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

QEII Health Sciences Center

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Universitatsmedizin Berlin Charite

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Orthocentrum Hamburg

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

Coventry, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Germany United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IDE 1006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The 3DKnee™ System: A Post-Market Study
NCT00764673 COMPLETED PHASE4