Enhancing the Clinical Effectiveness of Depression Screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback in General Practices
NCT ID: NCT03988985
Last Updated: 2023-07-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1030 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-17
2022-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Automated Feedback After Internet-based Depression Screening
NCT04633096
Increasing the Efficiency of Depression-screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback
NCT01879111
Feedback to Improve Depression Outcomes
NCT03162211
Feasibility of Depression Care Management by E-mail
NCT00755235
Patient Outcomes Reporting for Timely Assessments of Life With Depression: PORTAL-Depression
NCT03832283
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SCREENING
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PATIENT-GP-FEEDBACK
Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.
Patient-targeted feedback
The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment.
GP-targeted feedback
The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.
GP-FEEDBACK
Using a randomized-controlled study design in one third of the cases only the attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.
GP-targeted feedback
The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.
NO-FEEDBACK
Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will not receive any feedback.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient-targeted feedback
The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment.
GP-targeted feedback
The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Maximum Age: no maximum age
* Attendance in primary care with medical consultation
* Age ≥ 18 years;
* Sufficient language skills;
* Informed consent
* Patient Health Questionnaire-9 \> 9 points
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe somatic or/and psychological disorder that needs urgent treatment;
* Known diagnosis of a depressive disorder
* Current depression treatment
* Acute suicidal tendency;
* Severe cognitive or/and visual difficulties;
* Not being able to fill out questionnaires
* No contact details
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal Joint Committee
OTHER_GOV
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bernd Löwe, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Director of the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Baden-Würtenberg, Germany
University Medical Center Tuebingen
Tübingen, Baden-Würtenberg, Germany
Technical University of Munich - Medical Faculty
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
University Medical Center Jena
Jena, Thuringia, Germany
University Medical Center Hamburg
Hamburg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kohlmann S, Lehmann M, Eisele M, Braunschneider LE, Marx G, Zapf A, Wegscheider K, Harter M, Konig HH, Gallinat J, Joos S, Resmark G, Schneider A, Allwang C, Szecsenyi J, Nikendei C, Schulz S, Brenk-Franz K, Scherer M, Lowe B. Depression screening using patient-targeted feedback in general practices: study protocol of the German multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e035973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035973.
Lowe B, Scherer M, Braunschneider LE, Marx G, Eisele M, Mallon T, Schneider A, Linde K, Allwang C, Joos S, Zipfel S, Schulz S, Rost L, Brenk-Franz K, Szecsenyi J, Nikendei C, Harter M, Gallinat J, Konig HH, Fierenz A, Vettorazzi E, Zapf A, Lehmann M, Kohlmann S. Clinical effectiveness of patient-targeted feedback following depression screening in general practice (GET.FEEDBACK.GP): an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, three-arm, observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial in Germany. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;11(4):262-273. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00035-X. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UHHamburgEppendorfGetFeedback
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.