Enhancing the Clinical Effectiveness of Depression Screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback in General Practices

NCT ID: NCT03988985

Last Updated: 2023-07-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1030 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-17

Study Completion Date

2022-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The multi-center GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomized controlled trial is designed based on patients' needs and preferences. In order to evaluate the effect of feedback in the broader setting of primary care, a total of 1076 primary care patients with elevated levels of depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) will be randomized into three groups who either receive a) patient-targeted and physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results, b) a physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results only, or c) no feedback of screening results. The primary study outcome is depression severity after 6 months, secondary outcomes include the patients' behavior and cognitions after the screening, depression care according to German guideline recommendations and the health economic evaluation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Major depression is one of the most significant clinical disorders. In primary care, every sixth patient suffers from increased depression level, which is associated with higher risk of suicide, increased risk of onset and progression of chronic physical conditions. Still, depression is under recognized and undertreated in primary care. Moreover, evidence regarding the efficacy of depression screening in primary care is insufficient to draw clear conclusions. Our previous mono-center depression screening trial in cardiac patients, provides first evidence that written patient-targeted feedback improves depression severity, encourages greater patient participation and engagement in mental health. To amplify these effects, the multi-center GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomized controlled trial is now designed based on patients' needs and preferences. In order to evaluate the effect of feedback in the broader setting of primary care, a total of 1076 primary care patients with elevated levels of depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) will be randomized into three groups who either receive a) patient-targeted and physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results, b) a physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results only, or c) no feedback of screening results. The primary study outcome is depression severity after 6 months, secondary outcomes include the patients' behavior and cognitions after the screening, depression care according to German guideline recommendations and the health economic evaluation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PATIENT-GP-FEEDBACK

Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Patient-targeted feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment.

GP-targeted feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.

GP-FEEDBACK

Using a randomized-controlled study design in one third of the cases only the attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

GP-targeted feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.

NO-FEEDBACK

Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will not receive any feedback.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patient-targeted feedback

The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment.

Intervention Type OTHER

GP-targeted feedback

The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Gender: male, female, diverse
* Maximum Age: no maximum age
* Attendance in primary care with medical consultation
* Age ≥ 18 years;
* Sufficient language skills;
* Informed consent
* Patient Health Questionnaire-9 \> 9 points

Exclusion Criteria

* Life threatening health status;
* Severe somatic or/and psychological disorder that needs urgent treatment;
* Known diagnosis of a depressive disorder
* Current depression treatment
* Acute suicidal tendency;
* Severe cognitive or/and visual difficulties;
* Not being able to fill out questionnaires
* No contact details
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal Joint Committee

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernd Löwe, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Director of the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Heidelberg

Heidelberg, Baden-Würtenberg, Germany

Site Status

University Medical Center Tuebingen

Tübingen, Baden-Würtenberg, Germany

Site Status

Technical University of Munich - Medical Faculty

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

University Medical Center Jena

Jena, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

University Medical Center Hamburg

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kohlmann S, Lehmann M, Eisele M, Braunschneider LE, Marx G, Zapf A, Wegscheider K, Harter M, Konig HH, Gallinat J, Joos S, Resmark G, Schneider A, Allwang C, Szecsenyi J, Nikendei C, Schulz S, Brenk-Franz K, Scherer M, Lowe B. Depression screening using patient-targeted feedback in general practices: study protocol of the German multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e035973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035973.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32958483 (View on PubMed)

Lowe B, Scherer M, Braunschneider LE, Marx G, Eisele M, Mallon T, Schneider A, Linde K, Allwang C, Joos S, Zipfel S, Schulz S, Rost L, Brenk-Franz K, Szecsenyi J, Nikendei C, Harter M, Gallinat J, Konig HH, Fierenz A, Vettorazzi E, Zapf A, Lehmann M, Kohlmann S. Clinical effectiveness of patient-targeted feedback following depression screening in general practice (GET.FEEDBACK.GP): an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, three-arm, observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial in Germany. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;11(4):262-273. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00035-X. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38432236 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UHHamburgEppendorfGetFeedback

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.