Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
258 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Care Manager - Coordinating Care for Person Centered Management of Depression in Primary Care
NCT02378272
Treatment for Depression in the Primary Care Setting
NCT00055328
Standardized Assessment in Depression Treatment in Routine Psychiatric Services
NCT06332261
Improving Outcomes of Depression in Primary Care
NCT00105833
Tailored Implementation Intervention for Managing Depressed Elderly Patients in Primary Care
NCT01913236
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Structured patient visits
Participants in the intervention group visit their general practitioner at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, participants complete MADRS-s for the assessment of depression severity and discuss the results with their GP in a patient-centered consultation.
Structured patient-centered follow up of depression
All patients who agree to participate in the study are diagnosed by their GP with a diagnostic assessment instrument called PRIME-MD. Participants in the intervention group visit their GPs at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, participants complete MADRS-s for the assessment of depression severity and discuss the results with their GP in a patient-centered consultation. We have chosen to use the MADRS/MADRS-S depression rating scale in this study because it is a easy to use standard instrument especially suitable for measuring change in depressive symptoms.
The control group receives treatment as usual (no intervention).
Treatment as usual
The control group receives treatment as usual by general practitioner (no intervention).
Structured patient-centered follow up of depression
All patients who agree to participate in the study are diagnosed by their GP with a diagnostic assessment instrument called PRIME-MD. Participants in the intervention group visit their GPs at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, participants complete MADRS-s for the assessment of depression severity and discuss the results with their GP in a patient-centered consultation. We have chosen to use the MADRS/MADRS-S depression rating scale in this study because it is a easy to use standard instrument especially suitable for measuring change in depressive symptoms.
The control group receives treatment as usual (no intervention).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Structured patient-centered follow up of depression
All patients who agree to participate in the study are diagnosed by their GP with a diagnostic assessment instrument called PRIME-MD. Participants in the intervention group visit their GPs at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, participants complete MADRS-s for the assessment of depression severity and discuss the results with their GP in a patient-centered consultation. We have chosen to use the MADRS/MADRS-S depression rating scale in this study because it is a easy to use standard instrument especially suitable for measuring change in depressive symptoms.
The control group receives treatment as usual (no intervention).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Attends a participating primary health care center in the region
* Diagnosis of mild/moderate depressive disorder (new episode)
* No change in possible antidepressant maintenance therapy during the preceding 1 month
* Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient diagnosed with major depressive disorder (BDI-II \>28)
* Patients diagnosed of severe mental psychiatric disorder (i.e. bipolar disorder, antisocial personality disorder, psychosis, substance use disorder or other serious mental disorder)
* Suicidal ideation or intentions
* Inability to speak and understand Swedish language well enough to take part in the activities required in the study.
* Cognitive impairment that makes it impossible to take part in the activities required in the study
* Does not provide written informed consent to participation in the study
20 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vastra Gotaland Region
OTHER_GOV
Göteborg University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cecila Björkelund, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Göteborg University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Gothenburg
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wikberg C, Westman J, Petersson EL, Larsson ME, Andre M, Eggertsen R, Thorn J, Agren H, Bjorkelund C. Use of a self-rating scale to monitor depression severity in recurrent GP consultations in primary care - does it really make a difference? A randomised controlled study. BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Jan 19;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0578-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Madrs 2010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.