Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PEER Interactive to Inform Medication Prescription for Subjects With a Primary Diagnosis of Depression
NCT ID: NCT02988076
Last Updated: 2020-07-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
PHASE2/PHASE3
468 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PEER Interactive Versus Treatment as Usual in Subjects With a Primary Diagnosis of Depression
NCT01794559
PEER Interactive to Inform the Prescription of Medications
NCT04620499
The Canadian Armed Forces PEER Study
NCT03625271
Mobile Technology to Engage and Link Patients and Providers in Antidepressant Treatment
NCT01909973
Cognitive and Mood Assessment Data in Major Depressive Disorder Using Digital Wearable Technology
NCT03067506
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The subjects will be washed out of all current medications prior to having an electroencephalogram (EEG), which is necessary to generate the PEER Interactive Report. The wash out period for outpatients is no longer than 14 days.
The subjects will be followed for 3 months after the initial treatment. The patient will be seen on a routine basis and assessments will be made at each interaction to evaluate the patient's improvement in mental health. The subjects will also be closely evaluated to determine if they are experiencing any psychiatric specific adverse events. The investigator is allowed to treat the patient according to their best medical judgment, which may include adding or changing medications, seeing the patient more frequently, or other interventions such as the use of sleep aids.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
The Control group subjects will undergo all procedures e.g. medication washout and baseline electroencephalogram, administered to the Treatment/Experimental group. A clinician treating a Control Group subject will NOT receive the Psychiatric Electroencephalogram Evaluation Registry (PEER) Interactive Report (of probable medication response) under investigation and will treat the Subject with Standard of Care. The subject will be blinded to group assignment and will provide the primary outcome measure - Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report 16 item questionnaire.
No interventions assigned to this group
Treatment
Intervention - Psychiatric Electroencephalogram Evaluation Registry (PEER) Interactive Report - Treatment group subjects will undergo all procedures e.g. medication washout and baseline electroencephalogram, administered to the Control group. A clinician treating a Treatment Group subject will receive the Psychiatric Electroencephalogram Evaluation Registry (PEER) Report (of probable medication response) under investigation and will incorporate the Report information during prescription of medications to the Subject. The subject will be blinded to group assignment and will provide the primary outcome measure - Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report 16 item questionnaire.
PEER Interactive Report
A subinvestigator treating a Treatment Group subject will receive the Psychiatric Electroencephalogram Evaluation Registry (PEER) Interactive Report (of probable medication response) under investigation and will incorporate the Report information during prescription of medications to the Subject. A subinvestigator treating a Control Group subject will NOT receive the PEER Report and will treat the Subject with Standard of Care. The subject will be blinded to group assignment and will provide the primary outcome measure - Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report 16 item questionnaire.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEER Interactive Report
A subinvestigator treating a Treatment Group subject will receive the Psychiatric Electroencephalogram Evaluation Registry (PEER) Interactive Report (of probable medication response) under investigation and will incorporate the Report information during prescription of medications to the Subject. A subinvestigator treating a Control Group subject will NOT receive the PEER Report and will treat the Subject with Standard of Care. The subject will be blinded to group assignment and will provide the primary outcome measure - Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report 16 item questionnaire.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjects able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
3. Subjects with a primary diagnosis of a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) depressive disorder. Please see Appendix D for definitions.
4. Subjects with comorbidity of a non-psychotic behavioral disorder. Please see Appendix D for definitions.
5. Subjects with comorbidity of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are eligible for inclusion in this study.
6. Subjects with comorbidity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are eligible for inclusion in this study. A score of 45 or greater on the PTSD Checklist Civilian (PCL-C) measurement tool will qualify a subject for inclusion of diagnosis of PTSD as a comorbid condition.
7. Able to stop specified medications, including drugs of abuse, for 5 half-lives of the medication(s). See Appendix E for a list of the withdrawal periods for medications. The potential subject's primary care physician may be consulted to make these determinations.
8. Able to be washed out of medications within 14 days, i.e. 5 half-lives are not longer than 14 days (See Appendix E).
9. Ability to comply with the requirements of the study.
\-
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects who cannot provide written informed consent.
3. Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Please see Appendix D for definitions.
4. History of, or current, open head brain trauma.
5. Subjects with comorbidity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) who experienced greater than 30 minutes loss of consciousness, greater than 24 hour alteration in consciousness or mental status, greater than 24 hours of post traumatic amnesia, or a Glasgow Coma Scale (best available score in first 24 hours) of less than 13.
6. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator would not be good candidates to be washed out of specified medications (Appendix E) and are unable to washout medications and/or supplements in a period of 14 days or less.
7. History of: craniotomy, cerebral metastases, cerebrovascular accident; current diagnosis of seizure disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, dementia, mental retardation, or major depression with psychotic features; or use of depot neuroleptics in last 12 months.
8. Clinically significant medical illness, including thyroid disorders, diabetes, etc., which cannot be remediated with medication, e.g. synthroid, insulin, etc.
9. Participation in any other therapeutic drug study within 60 days preceding inclusion.
10. Known pregnancy and/or lactation, or intent to become pregnant during this study.
11. Chronic or acute pain requiring prescription pain medication(s) (narcotic or synthetic narcotic).
12. Candidates with any metal, shrapnel or other similar objects in the head that could affect the QEEG.
13. Candidates currently stable on current medications.
14. Pre-entry subject whose urine drug screen is positive for drugs of abuse.
\-
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mount Sinai Hospital, New York
OTHER
MYnd Analytics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel Iosifescu, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, N.Y.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carolina Partners
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
DeBattista C, Kinrys G, Hoffman D, Goldstein C, Zajecka J, Kocsis J, Teicher M, Potkin S, Preda A, Multani G, Brandt L, Schiller M, Iosifescu D, Fava M. The use of referenced-EEG (rEEG) in assisting medication selection for the treatment of depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Jan;45(1):64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
Demyttenaere K, Desaiah D, Petit C, Croenlein J, Brecht S. Patient-assessed versus physician-assessed disease severity and outcome in patients with nonspecific pain associated with major depressive disorder. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;11(1):8-15. doi: 10.4088/pcc.08m00670.
Duffy FH, Burchfiel JL, Lombroso CT. Brain electrical activity mapping (BEAM): a method for extending the clinical utility of EEG and evoked potential data. Ann Neurol. 1979 Apr;5(4):309-21. doi: 10.1002/ana.410050402.
Hughes JR, John ER. Conventional and quantitative electroencephalography in psychiatry. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1999 Spring;11(2):190-208. doi: 10.1176/jnp.11.2.190.
Hoffman DA, Debattista C, Valuck RJ, Iosifescu DV. Measuring severe adverse events and medication selection using a "PEER Report" for nonpsychotic patients: a retrospective chart review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2012;8:277-84. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S31665. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
Rush AJ, Bernstein IH, Trivedi MH, Carmody TJ, Wisniewski S, Mundt JC, Shores-Wilson K, Biggs MM, Woo A, Nierenberg AA, Fava M. An evaluation of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology and the hamilton rating scale for depression: a sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression trial report. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Mar 15;59(6):493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.022. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Please email [email protected] for approved version of the protocol
View DocumentDocument Type: Informed Consent Form
Please email [email protected] for approved version of ICD
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CNSR012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.