Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury
NCT ID: NCT03978845
Last Updated: 2020-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-15
2020-09-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ventilation and Pulmonary Aeration, Electrical Impedance Tomography, Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
NCT03577860
The Effect of Brachial Plexus Block on Diaphragm Movement
NCT06640621
Pulmonary Function Changes and Diaphragmatic Paralysis Following Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: The Effects of Decreased Local Anesthetic Volume
NCT01048021
Supraclavicular Block vs Retroclavicular Block: Incidence of Phrenic Nerve Paralysis
NCT02631122
US-Guided Preemptive Brachial Plexus Blockade May Reduce Post-operative Pain: a Randomized Study
NCT04005534
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Because of the augmented neural drive of such patients, exacerbated by inflammation and pulmonary edema, the consequent high tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure cannot be reduced by the newest sedatives. In fact, some of these sedatives may even deteriorate ventilatory dyssynchrony. Our intention is to verify a novel approach: whether is possible to reduce the inspiratory effort of patients without the use of systemic neuromuscular blocking agents.
Our objective in this proof of concept study is to determine the feasibility the use of phrenic nerve blockade to decrease transpulmonary pressure and tidal volume, as well as quantify its effects on esophageal pressure, diaphragmatic electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and ventilation distribution in patients on spontaneous breathing. It is expected that such intervention will reduce diaphragm electrical activity, leading to lower transpulmonary pressure, tidal volume and driving pressures.
All patients will be submitted to the same intervention. Respiratory mechanics, ventilation distribution, diaphragm electrical activity, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and peripheral saturation will be collected throughout the study. Once the patient presents the same diaphragmatic electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block, the study will be over.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Phrenic Nerve Blockade
All patients will be submitted to bilateral phrenic nerve block on its cervical portion.
Lidocaine
Using an ultrasound and a nerve stimulator, the phrenic nerve will be identified and low-dose lidocaine will be administered perineurally.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine
Using an ultrasound and a nerve stimulator, the phrenic nerve will be identified and low-dose lidocaine will be administered perineurally.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing, capable of triggering the ventilator with P/F \< 300;
* Tidal volume \> 10ml/kg with inspiratory pressure of 12 cmH2O OR driving pressure \> 15 cm H2O with inspiratory pressure of 12 cmH2O
Exclusion Criteria
* Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) \> 0;
* Arterial pH \< 7.25;
* Hemodynamically unstable or with increasing doses of vasopressors in the last 2h;
* Intracranial hypertension;
* Thoracic or abdominal tubes;
* Any neuromuscular disease;
* Spinal injury;
* Ascitis;
* Thoracic burn injury;
* Tetanus;
* Pregnancy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joaquim E Vieira, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine
Marcelo BP Amato, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital das Clínicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAAE 02029118.2.0000.00.68
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.