Phrenic Nerve Block to Mitigate Self-inflicted Lung Injury

NCT ID: NCT03978845

Last Updated: 2020-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-15

Study Completion Date

2020-09-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this single-centered, proof of concept study is to determine whether it is feasible to perform a phrenic nerve block to reduce diaphragm electrical activity and, therefore, inspiratory effort and if such block reduces self-inflicted lung injury on patients under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing. Ten patients will be monitored with electrical impedance tomography, NAVA catheter, and esophageal balloon. Using a nerve stimulator and an ultrasound, we will identify the phrenic nerve on its cervical portion bilaterally and administer perineural low-dose lidocaine. Diaphragm electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and data on ventilation distribution will be continuously collected. The study will be over once the patient presents the same diaphragm electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of protective mechanical ventilation has improved prognosis on patients with Acute Respiratory Failure. The association of neuromuscular blockade in the first 48-72h has additionally contributed to a higher survival rate. Such improvement may be due to the reduction of transpulmonary pressures caused by the patient's inspiratory effort. To achieve appropriate neuromuscular blockade, highes doses of both neuromuscular blocking agents and sedatives are required. Therefore, such a strategy usually causes muscular atrophy, including the diaphragm.

Because of the augmented neural drive of such patients, exacerbated by inflammation and pulmonary edema, the consequent high tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure cannot be reduced by the newest sedatives. In fact, some of these sedatives may even deteriorate ventilatory dyssynchrony. Our intention is to verify a novel approach: whether is possible to reduce the inspiratory effort of patients without the use of systemic neuromuscular blocking agents.

Our objective in this proof of concept study is to determine the feasibility the use of phrenic nerve blockade to decrease transpulmonary pressure and tidal volume, as well as quantify its effects on esophageal pressure, diaphragmatic electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and ventilation distribution in patients on spontaneous breathing. It is expected that such intervention will reduce diaphragm electrical activity, leading to lower transpulmonary pressure, tidal volume and driving pressures.

All patients will be submitted to the same intervention. Respiratory mechanics, ventilation distribution, diaphragm electrical activity, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and peripheral saturation will be collected throughout the study. Once the patient presents the same diaphragmatic electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block, the study will be over.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

All patients will be submitted to the same procedures. There will be no between-group comparisons.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Phrenic Nerve Blockade

All patients will be submitted to bilateral phrenic nerve block on its cervical portion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Using an ultrasound and a nerve stimulator, the phrenic nerve will be identified and low-dose lidocaine will be administered perineurally.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine

Using an ultrasound and a nerve stimulator, the phrenic nerve will be identified and low-dose lidocaine will be administered perineurally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Local anesthetic

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 17 years-old;
* Under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing, capable of triggering the ventilator with P/F \< 300;
* Tidal volume \> 10ml/kg with inspiratory pressure of 12 cmH2O OR driving pressure \> 15 cm H2O with inspiratory pressure of 12 cmH2O

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of neuromuscular blocking agents less than 3h;
* Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) \> 0;
* Arterial pH \< 7.25;
* Hemodynamically unstable or with increasing doses of vasopressors in the last 2h;
* Intracranial hypertension;
* Thoracic or abdominal tubes;
* Any neuromuscular disease;
* Spinal injury;
* Ascitis;
* Thoracic burn injury;
* Tetanus;
* Pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joaquim E Vieira, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine

Marcelo BP Amato, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital das Clínicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAAE 02029118.2.0000.00.68

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.