Pulmonary Function Changes and Diaphragmatic Paralysis Following Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade: The Effects of Decreased Local Anesthetic Volume

NCT ID: NCT01048021

Last Updated: 2017-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial is being conducted to study lung function and movement of the major muscle involved in breathing (the diaphragm) after a brachial plexus nerve block (nerve "freezing"). The purpose of this study is to find out what effects (good and bad) ultrasound guided nerve freezing has on the movement of the patient's diaphragm and their lung function.

The potential advantage of ultrasound guidance will be a lesser chance of freezing the nerves that innervate the diaphragm and thus having less of an effect on lung function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus blockade was first described by Kulenkampf in 1911. With classic "blind" techniques, an incidence of pneumothorax has been reported ranging from 0.5-6.0%, limiting its widespread use, despite the belief that the supraclavicular approach is the most consistent, effective technique for anesthetizing the brachial plexus. With the advent of ultrasound guidance and real time visualization this risk has been minimized and a resurgence in utilization of this approach has occurred. Increased block success, diminished performance times, and lower anesthetic volumes have been observed with this technique when compared to nerve stimulator techniques. Despite these advantages, brachial plexus anesthesia above the clavicle is associated with diaphragmatic dysfunction and caution must be demonstrated in patients with respiratory disease. Interscalene brachial plexus blockade has been widely documented to produce a 100% incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis and an associated 25% mean reduction in forced vital capacity (FVC) with local anesthetic volumes ranging from 20 - 45mL 8-10, these parameters for supraclavicular brachial plexus blockage are not as well defined. Previous investigations report an incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis of 1-75% with supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. This study will address whether diaphragmatic function and respiratory mechanics can be preserved with lower anesthetic volumes in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diaphragmatic Function Lung Function

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Supraclavicular Block

Supraclavicular Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Baseline values of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) will be measured in both the sitting and supine position. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks will be performed in the supine position with a Pajunk 22g block needle and nerve stimulator. The patients will receive local anesthetic injection with 15 mL of 0.75% Bupivicaine. A maximum of 3 cc of 5% Dextrose will be utilized as contrast to confirm needle tip placement and fluid spread prior to injection of the local anesthetic.

At 60 minutes post-injection, FEV1, FVC, and PEFR measurements will be taken in the sitting and supine position.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Supraclavicular Block

Baseline values of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) will be measured in both the sitting and supine position. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks will be performed in the supine position with a Pajunk 22g block needle and nerve stimulator. The patients will receive local anesthetic injection with 15 mL of 0.75% Bupivicaine. A maximum of 3 cc of 5% Dextrose will be utilized as contrast to confirm needle tip placement and fluid spread prior to injection of the local anesthetic.

At 60 minutes post-injection, FEV1, FVC, and PEFR measurements will be taken in the sitting and supine position.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* eligible patients undergoing Supraclavicular blockade

Exclusion Criteria

* \< 18 years of age,
* mental illness precluding informed consent,
* infection at the injection site,
* coagulopathy,
* allergy to local anesthetics,
* inability to comprehend English,
* pulmonary disease, and
* pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Manitoba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Patricia Myktiuk

Dr. Patricia Mykytiuk

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Patricia Mykytiuk, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesia, University of Manitoba

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HSC Pain Management Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B2008:061

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.