Assessment of Portable Oxygen Concentrators in Infants Undergoing Hypoxic Challenge Testing.
NCT ID: NCT03976986
Last Updated: 2019-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-11
2019-02-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Portable Oxygen Concentrator Signal Capture Study
NCT03182036
Accuracy of BabySat V3 With Profound Hypoxia and Motion
NCT05581394
POX Range and the Threshold for Screening Major CHD in Neonates at Different Altitudes
NCT04238104
Cardio-respiratory Responses During Hypoxic Exercise in Individuals Born Prematurely
NCT02780908
Accuracy of Owlet Smart Sock Sensor 3rd Generation With Profound Hypoxia
NCT04446247
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cPOC - pPOC
Randomized crossover study (according to a random number table): Patients are allocated randomly to two study groups (cPOC/pPOC). In case of Sat.O2 drop ≤ 85% during HCT, oxygen is administered by cPOC (continuous-flow). For patients who show a positive POC hypoxic reversal, HCT is repeated at 24 hours and oxygen is administered by pPOC (pulsed-flow).
continuous-flow portable oxygen concentrator (cPOC)
SeQal Eclipse 3® on continuous-flow (SeQual,Ball Ground,GA): flow rate 2 litre per minute (lpm).
pulsed-flow portable oxygen concentrator (pPOC)
InogenOne G3® (Inogen,Goleta,CA) on pulsed-flow mode: setting 2 (flow rate 420 ml/min, 16.8 ml +/- 3ml per bolus at 25 rpm).
pPOC - cPOC
Randomized crossover study (according to a random number table): Patients are allocated randomly to two study groups (cPOC/pPOC). In case of Sat.O2 drop ≤ 85% during HCT, oxygen is administered by pPOC (pulsed-flow). For patients who show a positive POC hypoxic reversal, HCT is repeated at 24 hours and oxygen is administered by cPOC (continuous-flow).
continuous-flow portable oxygen concentrator (cPOC)
SeQal Eclipse 3® on continuous-flow (SeQual,Ball Ground,GA): flow rate 2 litre per minute (lpm).
pulsed-flow portable oxygen concentrator (pPOC)
InogenOne G3® (Inogen,Goleta,CA) on pulsed-flow mode: setting 2 (flow rate 420 ml/min, 16.8 ml +/- 3ml per bolus at 25 rpm).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
continuous-flow portable oxygen concentrator (cPOC)
SeQal Eclipse 3® on continuous-flow (SeQual,Ball Ground,GA): flow rate 2 litre per minute (lpm).
pulsed-flow portable oxygen concentrator (pPOC)
InogenOne G3® (Inogen,Goleta,CA) on pulsed-flow mode: setting 2 (flow rate 420 ml/min, 16.8 ml +/- 3ml per bolus at 25 rpm).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \<1 year with neonatal respiratory disease
* required oxygen supply in the last 6 months
* chronic respiratory disease (eg cystic fibrosis, obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease) with FEV 1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) or FVC (forced vital capacity) \<50%.
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Son Espases
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sebastian Sailer
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sebastian Sailer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Son Espases
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Son Espases
Palma Mallorca, Mallorca, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ahmedzai S, Balfour-Lynn IM, Bewick T, Buchdahl R, Coker RK, Cummin AR, Gradwell DP, Howard L, Innes JA, Johnson AO, Lim E, Lim WS, McKinlay KP, Partridge MR, Popplestone M, Pozniak A, Robson A, Shovlin CL, Shrikrishna D, Simonds A, Tait P, Thomas M; British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. Managing passengers with stable respiratory disease planning air travel: British Thoracic Society recommendations. Thorax. 2011 Sep;66 Suppl 1:i1-30. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200295. No abstract available.
Gong H Jr, Tashkin DP, Lee EY, Simmons MS. Hypoxia-altitude simulation test. Evaluation of patients with chronic airway obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Dec;130(6):980-6. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.6.980.
Blakeman TC, Rodriquez D Jr, Gerlach TW, Dorlac WC, Johannigman JA, Branson RD. Oxygen requirement to reverse altitude-induced hypoxemia with continuous flow and pulsed dose oxygen. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Apr;86(4):351-6. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4184.2015.
Fischer R, Wanka ER, Einhaeupl F, Voll K, Schiffl H, Lang SM, Gruss M, Ferrari U. Comparison of portable oxygen concentrators in a simulated airplane environment. Respir Med. 2013 Jan;107(1):147-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
Bunel V, Shoukri A, Choin F, Roblin S, Smith C, Similowski T, Morelot-Panzini C, Gonzalez J. Bench Evaluation of Four Portable Oxygen Concentrators Under Different Conditions Representing Altitudes of 2438, 4200, and 8000 m. High Alt Med Biol. 2016 Dec;17(4):370-374. doi: 10.1089/ham.2016.0056.
Chen JZ, Katz IM, Pichelin M, Zhu K, Caillibotte G, Finlay WH, Martin AR. In Vitro-In Silico Comparison of Pulsed Oxygen Delivery From Portable Oxygen Concentrators Versus Continuous Flow Oxygen Delivery. Respir Care. 2019 Feb;64(2):117-129. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06359. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
cop2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.