Practice of Sedation and Analgesia in Patients With Severe Brain Injury in China

NCT ID: NCT03975751

Last Updated: 2019-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

387 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-08

Study Completion Date

2019-03-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sedation and analgesia is necessary management for patients in the intensive care units. The high-level studies of sedation and analgesia in China are still deficient, especially in patients with brain injuries who even have been excluded from the relevant studies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sedation and analgesia is necessary management for patients in the intensive care units. The high-level studies of sedation and analgesia in China are still deficient, especially in patients with brain injuries who even have been excluded from the relevant studies. In the present study, a multicenter, 1-day point cross-sectional study about the sedation and analgesia among patients in China, particularly brain-injured will be investigated. The objectives are to investigate sedation and analgesia among patients in China and to compare sedation and analgesia between brain injuries and other patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intensive Care Unit

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

Use the common GCS, RASS and self-reported pain assessment for evaluating consciousness, agitation/sedation and analgesia.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) The self-reported pain assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients admitted to the participating ICUs on the investigation day

Exclusion Criteria

* Age under 18 years
* Less than 24 hours of ICU stay before screening
* Taking part in other studies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Capital Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jian-Xin Zhou

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jian-Xin Zhou, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ICU, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chen K, Yang YL, Li HL, Xiao D, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhou JX. A gap existed between physicians' perceptions and performance of pain, agitation-sedation and delirium assessments in Chinese intensive care units. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01286-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33627067 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY2017-062-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.