Intermittent vs Continuous Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT03963492

Last Updated: 2022-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-01

Study Completion Date

2023-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the effectiveness of a traditional, continuous walking rehabilitation program for people with MS to the novel intervention of an intermittent or interval walking rehabilitation program. Half of the participants will receive the continuous walking program while the other half will receive the novel intermittent walking program.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The typical rehabilitation of walking difficulties for people with MS has included practice walking. In general, this includes training to build walking endurance by having the person with MS walk until he/she becomes tired and needs to stop. Although this model has been used successfully to treat people with other diagnoses, it has limited effectiveness in improving walking ability and endurance in people with MS because of fatigue. Recently, a different model has been considered: intermittent or interval walking training. Interval walking training is organized such that seated rest breaks are intentionally interspersed between walking training bouts that end before the person with MS becomes too tired to continue. Exploratory research has shown that people with MS can walk faster and farther when using interval walking training, and may have more improvements in walking ability and endurance after using interval walking training. This study will compare the effectiveness of the traditional model of continuous walking training to the promising new model of interval walking training. This will help to determine whether interval or continuous walking training is superior in improving walking ability and endurance in people with MS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controlled pre-post study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Assessors blinded to experimental condition

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous Walking

Participants in the Continuous Walking (CONT) arm will undergo training 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions. The intervention for the CONT group will be to complete a 6-minute long walk without rest breaks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Walking

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will undergo training in either the CONT or INT walking interventions 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions.

Interval Walking

Participants in the Interval Walking (INT) arm will undergo training 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions. The intervention for the (INT) group will be to complete three 2-minute-long walks with 2-minute seated rest breaks between each walk

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Walking

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will undergo training in either the CONT or INT walking interventions 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Walking

Participants will undergo training in either the CONT or INT walking interventions 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Self-identified difficulty walking
* Definitive diagnosis of multiple sclerosis from a neurologist
* Signed an approved consent form
* Ability to ambulate for unaided for 6-minutes continuously with or without an assistive device (e.g. a cane or brace)
* Has not had a multiple sclerosis relapse in the past 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

* Unwilling or unable to complete assessments
* Unwilling or able to complete assessments and or intervention without the use of portable functional electrical stimulation devices
* Medical history of concomitant condition unrelated to multiple sclerosis which may impact results including: other neurological conditions including stroke, Parkinson's disease, or orthopedic, or cardiopulmonary conditions that affect walking
* Had a major change in exercise habits in the past three months
* Individuals reporting change in any disease modifying treatment or steroid use during the past 6 weeks
* Unable to walk for 6 minutes continuously without physical assistance
* Medical history of unstable angina, uncontrolled cardiac dysrhythmias causing symptoms, symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, uncontrolled symptomatic heart failure, acute pulmonary embolus or pulmonary infarction, history of deep vein thrombosis, acute myocarditis or pericarditis, acute systemic infection, uncontrolled hypertension, and uncontrolled diabetes
* Has an abnormal response to exercise
* Cannot adhere to protocol
* Determined to be unsafe at the discretion of the research team including individuals unwilling to wear safety "gait belt" during testing or not willing to wear proper footwear.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

City University of New York, School of Public Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Evan T. Cohen, SHRP Department of Rehabilitation and Movemen

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Evan T Cohen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis - Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro2019000453

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Exercise in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT02716701 TERMINATED NA
Exercise and Brain Health in MS
NCT03638739 COMPLETED NA
MS Symptom Management Study
NCT02474940 COMPLETED NA