A Natural Experiment Evaluating the Effect of a Minimum Wage Increase on Obesity and Diet-related Outcomes
NCT ID: NCT03962712
Last Updated: 2023-09-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
974 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-02-01
2023-03-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Nutrition Labeling on Fast Food Choices
NCT00127660
Eating Behaviors in Shift Workers
NCT04468672
Improving Nutritional Outcomes Among Food Insecure Twin Cities Residents
NCT01983891
Effects of Two-weeks of Time Restricted Feeding on Basal and Postprandial Metabolism in Healthy Men
NCT03969745
A Multilevel Intervention in the Hunger Relief Network to Improve Diet Among Adults Experiencing Food Insecurity
NCT03421106
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The available evidence suggests that minimum wage laws may be associated with a range of health outcomes, including obesity. Obesity affects 36.5% of Americans, and is disproportionately high among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics. A study by Meltzer and Chen (2009) estimated that 10% of the increase in body mass in the U.S. since 1970 can be explained through the diminished value of minimum wages by inflation, while Kim \& Leigh (2010) used instrumental variables to demonstrate that low wages increase the risk of obesity. Mechanisms through which increasing the minimum wage could reduce obesity include improving food security and reducing cost constraints for purchasing healthier foods. However, existing studies linking wages and weight have design weaknesses that limit causal inference and the ability to identify causal mechanisms. A prospective study with a strong counterfactual condition is needed to test whether and how an increase in minimum wage results in improved obesity-related outcomes among low-wage workers.
Throughout the 4.5-year implementation period of the Minneapolis minimum wage ordinance (January 1, 2018-July 1, 2022), the team will follow a cohort of low-wage workers in a natural experiment, using a difference-in-difference design to compare a panel of obesity-related measures among low-wage workers (those earning ≤$10 an hour at baseline) in Minneapolis (n = 400) with low-wage workers in a comparison city with no minimum wage increase (Raleigh, North Carolina, n = 400).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low-Wage Workers from Minneapolis, MN
Low-wage workers from Minneapolis, MN, where the minimum wage will be increased to $15-an-hour over the study period.
Increase Minimum Wage to $15-an-hour
Increase in minimum wage to $15-an-hour
Low-Wage Workers from Raleigh, NC
Low-wage workers from Raleigh, NC, where the minimum wage will not be significantly changed over the study period.
No Increase in Minimum Wage
No increase in minimum wage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Increase Minimum Wage to $15-an-hour
Increase in minimum wage to $15-an-hour
No Increase in Minimum Wage
No increase in minimum wage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Plan to serve in the workforce for at least 5 years
* Have an address and phone number where they can receive mail and phone calls (though they do not necessarily need to own a phone or have a permanent home)
* Speak English or Spanish well enough to complete the survey
* Either A OR B must be true:
A: Work at a wage of $11.50 an hour for at least an average of 10 hours a week, with at least 2 of those hours at a job in Minneapolis B: Be currently unemployed, but worked at a wage of $11.50 an hour or less for at least an average of 10 hours a week in the last 6 months AND be currently looking for working in Minneapolis
Exclusion Criteria
* Full-time students
* Plan to retire or move more than 100 miles away in the next 5 years
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Connecticut
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Caitlin Caspi
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Caitlin E Caspi, ScD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Connecticut
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H20-0087
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.