A Natural Experiment Evaluating the Effect of a Minimum Wage Increase on Obesity and Diet-related Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT03962712

Last Updated: 2023-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

974 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-01

Study Completion Date

2023-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the effect of the Minneapolis minimum wage ordinance on change in body mass index among low-wage workers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

On June 30 2017, Minneapolis became the 40th local jurisdiction to set the minimum wage above the state level, following a succession of other cities and counties across the U.S that have passed similar ordinances since 2012. The city of Minneapolis will incrementally increase the minimum wage from $9.50 to $15 by July 1, 2022 for all businesses with greater than 100 employees; minimum wage in smaller businesses will increase from $7.75 to $13.50 during this same time period. The ordinance specifically states that its purpose is to "maintain worker's health, efficacy, and general well-being." A report by members of the study team at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at University of Minnesota estimates that the ordinance would increase wages by an average of 22% for the 71,000 city workers making minimum wage or just above minimum wage; moreover, it would affect 41% of non-Hispanic black workers and 54% of Hispanic workers, compared with 17% of white workers. The report also projects a post-policy decrease in food insecurity of 3.8 percentage points and an increase in food expenditures of $26 per week among affected workers.

The available evidence suggests that minimum wage laws may be associated with a range of health outcomes, including obesity. Obesity affects 36.5% of Americans, and is disproportionately high among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics. A study by Meltzer and Chen (2009) estimated that 10% of the increase in body mass in the U.S. since 1970 can be explained through the diminished value of minimum wages by inflation, while Kim \& Leigh (2010) used instrumental variables to demonstrate that low wages increase the risk of obesity. Mechanisms through which increasing the minimum wage could reduce obesity include improving food security and reducing cost constraints for purchasing healthier foods. However, existing studies linking wages and weight have design weaknesses that limit causal inference and the ability to identify causal mechanisms. A prospective study with a strong counterfactual condition is needed to test whether and how an increase in minimum wage results in improved obesity-related outcomes among low-wage workers.

Throughout the 4.5-year implementation period of the Minneapolis minimum wage ordinance (January 1, 2018-July 1, 2022), the team will follow a cohort of low-wage workers in a natural experiment, using a difference-in-difference design to compare a panel of obesity-related measures among low-wage workers (those earning ≤$10 an hour at baseline) in Minneapolis (n = 400) with low-wage workers in a comparison city with no minimum wage increase (Raleigh, North Carolina, n = 400).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity Nutrition Poor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low-Wage Workers from Minneapolis, MN

Low-wage workers from Minneapolis, MN, where the minimum wage will be increased to $15-an-hour over the study period.

Increase Minimum Wage to $15-an-hour

Intervention Type OTHER

Increase in minimum wage to $15-an-hour

Low-Wage Workers from Raleigh, NC

Low-wage workers from Raleigh, NC, where the minimum wage will not be significantly changed over the study period.

No Increase in Minimum Wage

Intervention Type OTHER

No increase in minimum wage

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Increase Minimum Wage to $15-an-hour

Increase in minimum wage to $15-an-hour

Intervention Type OTHER

No Increase in Minimum Wage

No increase in minimum wage

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 or older.
* Plan to serve in the workforce for at least 5 years
* Have an address and phone number where they can receive mail and phone calls (though they do not necessarily need to own a phone or have a permanent home)
* Speak English or Spanish well enough to complete the survey
* Either A OR B must be true:

A: Work at a wage of $11.50 an hour for at least an average of 10 hours a week, with at least 2 of those hours at a job in Minneapolis B: Be currently unemployed, but worked at a wage of $11.50 an hour or less for at least an average of 10 hours a week in the last 6 months AND be currently looking for working in Minneapolis

Exclusion Criteria

* Federal or state workers
* Full-time students
* Plan to retire or move more than 100 miles away in the next 5 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Connecticut

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Caitlin Caspi

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Caitlin E Caspi, ScD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Connecticut

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H20-0087

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Trial of Menu Labeling
NCT01948752 COMPLETED NA
Breakfast Meal Replacement
NCT02482545 COMPLETED NA
A Study of Time Restricted Eating in Obese Adults
NCT05660291 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA