Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
6000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-12-19
2019-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this real world study, we wish to evaluate retrospectively the effectiveness and persistence on treatment of GLP-1RA therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes from 2010 to 2018.
Effectiveness endpoints will be glycemic (fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c) and extra-glycemic (body weight and blood pressure). Data from diabetes outpatient clinics in North East Italy will be automatically extracted from electronic chart records and collected into a unique database.
Different groups of GLP-1RA therapies will be compared:
* Long-acting (e.g. dulaglutide and exenatide once weekly) versus short acting (exenatide, liraglutide and lixisenatide)
* Fixed versus flexible combinations of GLP-1RA and basal insulin.
* GLP-1RA with similarities to human GLP-1 (e.g. liraglutide) versus exendin-based GLP-1RA (e.g. exenatide).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists According to Type 2 Diabetes Subtypes
NCT06120556
Real-world Evaluation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RA) on Efficacy and Persistence, Adherence and Therapeutic Inertia Among Type 2 Diabetes Adults With Obesity
NCT05535322
GLP1-RAs Effects on Inflammatory and Endothelial Biomarkers in T2DM
NCT07314684
Endothelial and Metabolic Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) in Coronary Circulation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00923962
Relationship Between Improvement in Insulin Secretion and Decrease in HbA1c in GLP-1 RA Therapy in T2DM Patients
NCT04135287
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the absence of data from RCTs, observational studies can provide medium-level evidence to inform clinical practice, if well-designed and carefully conducted. Real-world studies are hypothesis-generating and cannot substitute for RCTs, but they can guide the design of dedicated RCTs. Retrospective real-world studies are particularly attractive as they can rapidly gather data from large heterogeneous populations that are representative of those seen in routine clinical practice.
Design. The GLP-1REWIN study is a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study on T2D patients initiating GLP-1RA in the routine clinical practice of Italian diabetes outpatient clinics. The study will be conducted at 6 diabetes specialist outpatient clinics in the Veneto Region, North-East Italy.
Objective. The general objective of the study is to evaluate effectiveness of GLP-1RA on glycemic and extra-glycemic endpoints in the real world clinical practice from 2010 to 2018. The study will be conducted at diabetes Centers because only diabetologists were allowed to prescribe GLP-1RA in Italy during the study period.
Methods. Data will be collected retrospectively by automatically interrogating the same electronic chart at all Centers. A dedicated software was developed to extract all relevant anonymized patient information into a clinical research form without manual intervention. We will collect data on all patients aged 18-80 years, with a diagnosis of T2D since at least 1 year (as recorded in the chart), who initiated one GLP-1RA available on the market between 1st Jan 2010 to 31st Dec 2018. These included exenatide twice daily and once weekly, liraglutide, lixisenatide, dulaglutide and fixed ratio combinations of BI/GLP-1RA. The baseline visit date will be set as the date when the patients attended the outpatient clinic and received for the first time a new prescription of GLP-1RA. The following clinical characteristics and laboratory data will be collected from the electronic chart up to 90 days before baseline: age, sex, diabetes duration, body height and weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides (LDL cholesterol was calculated using Friedwald's equation), liver enzymes, serum creatinine (eGFR was calculated using the chronic kidney diseae \[CKD\]-Epidemiology \[EPI\] equation), urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER, expressed as mg/g of urinary creatinine). Details on chronic complication, as reported by international classification of disease (ICD)-9 codes in the electronic charts wil be used to define the presence of micro- and macroangiopathy. Microangiopathy will be defined as any of the following: UAER \>30 mg/g; eGFR\<60 ml/min/1.73 m2; diabetic retinopathy (any stage) or diabetic macular edema; peripheral or autonomic neuropathy. Macroangiopathy will be defined as any of the following: peripheral arterial disease or peripheral revascularization; history of stroke/transient ischemic attack or carotid revascularization; ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, history of myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. Information on concomitant medications for the treatment of diabetes and of other cardiovascular risk factors will also be recorded. Detailed dose data will be collected for insulin and GLP-1RA. After having set the baseline date, we will identify the first available follow-up visit attended by the patients at the same Clinic at least 3 months after baseline. Updated values of HbA1c, FPG, SBP and body weight were recorded at the end of follow-up, along with updated information on medications and dosages of GLP-RA.
We will compare the changes in glycemic (HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose) and extra-glycemic (body weight and systolic blood pressure) effectiveness parameters between patients in two groups.
Different groups of GLP-1RA therapies will be compared:
* Long-acting (e.g. dulaglutide and exenatide once weekly) versus short acting (exenatide, liraglutide and lixisenatide)
* Fixed versus flexible combinations of GLP-1RA and basal insulin.
* GLP-1RA with similarities to human GLP-1 (e.g. liraglutide) versus exendin-based GLP-1RA (e.g. exenatide).
Statistics. Continuous variables will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed or as median (interquartile range) if non-normally distributed. Non-normal variables will be log-transformed before being analyzed with parametric tests. Categorical variables will be expressed as percentage. The comparison of baseline characteristics between two groups will be performed using unpaired 2-tail Student's t test for continuous variables and with chi square for categorical variables. To evaluate the balance between two groups, in addition to p-values, we will calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD). The intra-group change in effectiveness endpoint variables from baseline to end of follow-up will be analyzed using paired 2-tail Student's t test. We will then calculate the change in endpoint variables within each group, which will be compared using unpaired 2-tail Student's t test.
To address the issue of channeling bias (differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups that drive differential outcomes), we will use two different approaches. In the primary analysis, we will perform a propensity score matching (PSM), whereas multivariable adjustment (MVA) with linear regressions will be used as a second approach.
Statistical analyses will be performed using SAS version 9.4 (TS1M4) or higher and a 2-tail p-value \<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Long-acting GLP-1RA
Patients who have been treated with weekly GLP-1RA (exenatide once weekly or dulaglutide)
Long-acting GLP-1RA
Dulaglutide 0.75 or 1.5 mg /week or Exenatide once weekly 2 mg
Short-acting GLP-1RA
Patients who have been treated with daily GLP-1RA (exenatide bid or liraglutide or lixisenatide)
Short-acting GLP-1RA
Liraglutide 0.6 mg or 1.2 mg or 1.8 mg / day or exenatide 10 mcg or 20 mcg bid or lixisenatide 10 mcg or 20 mcg / day.
Human GLP-1 based GLP-1RA
Patients who have been treated with GLP-1RA based on human GLP-1 (dulaglutide or liraglutide)
Human-based GLP-1RA
Liraglutide 0.6 mg or 1.2 mg or 1.8 mg / day or dulaglutide 0.75 or 1.5 mg / week
Exendin-based GLP-1RA
Patients who have been treated with weekly GLP-1RA (exenatide or lixisenatide)
Exendin-based GLP-1RA
Exenatide 10 mcg or 20 mcg day or 2 mg / week or lixisenatide 10 mcg or 20 mcg / day.
Fixed ratio combination of BI/GLP-1RA
Patients who have been treated with a fixed ratio combination of GLP-1RA and basal insulin (BI), such as IdegLira (insulin degludec / liraglutide) or IglarLixi (insulin glargine / lixisenatide)
Fixed ratio BI/GLP-1RA combination
Insulin degludec / liraglutide (0.036/U) or insulin glargine / lixisenatide (0.5 mcg/U)
Flexible combination of BI/GLP-1RA
Patients who have been treated with any GLP-1RA in combination with any basal insulin (BI)
Flexible BI/GLP-1RA combination
GLP-1RA (Liraglutide or dulaglutide or exenatide or lixisenatide) and basal insulin (BI, glargine, degludec, detemir, NPH insulin)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Long-acting GLP-1RA
Dulaglutide 0.75 or 1.5 mg /week or Exenatide once weekly 2 mg
Short-acting GLP-1RA
Liraglutide 0.6 mg or 1.2 mg or 1.8 mg / day or exenatide 10 mcg or 20 mcg bid or lixisenatide 10 mcg or 20 mcg / day.
Human-based GLP-1RA
Liraglutide 0.6 mg or 1.2 mg or 1.8 mg / day or dulaglutide 0.75 or 1.5 mg / week
Exendin-based GLP-1RA
Exenatide 10 mcg or 20 mcg day or 2 mg / week or lixisenatide 10 mcg or 20 mcg / day.
Fixed ratio BI/GLP-1RA combination
Insulin degludec / liraglutide (0.036/U) or insulin glargine / lixisenatide (0.5 mcg/U)
Flexible BI/GLP-1RA combination
GLP-1RA (Liraglutide or dulaglutide or exenatide or lixisenatide) and basal insulin (BI, glargine, degludec, detemir, NPH insulin)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diabetes duration of at least 1 year
* Initiated on a GLP-1RA during the data collection period
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous therapy with a GLP-1RA before the data collection period
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
OTHER
University of Padova
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gian Paolo Fadini, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Padova
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Servizio di Diabetologia UOC Medicina Generale
Cittadella, Padova, Italy
U.O.S Diabetologia, Ospedale di Schiavonia
Monselice, Padova, Italy
U.O. Diabetologia ULSS2
Pieve di Soligo, Treviso, Italy
U.O. Diabetologia e Dietetica ULSS6
Padua, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
Padua, , Italy
Diabetologia ULSS2
Treviso, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lovshin JA, Drucker DJ. Incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009 May;5(5):262-9. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.48.
Bethel MA, Patel RA, Merrill P, Lokhnygina Y, Buse JB, Mentz RJ, Pagidipati NJ, Chan JC, Gustavson SM, Iqbal N, Maggioni AP, Ohman P, Poulter NR, Ramachandran A, Zinman B, Hernandez AF, Holman RR; EXSCEL Study Group. Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;6(2):105-113. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30412-6. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tsapas A, Wexler DJ, Buse JB. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
Abd El Aziz MS, Kahle M, Meier JJ, Nauck MA. A meta-analysis comparing clinical effects of short- or long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists versus insulin treatment from head-to-head studies in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Feb;19(2):216-227. doi: 10.1111/dom.12804. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
Singh S, Wright EE Jr, Kwan AY, Thompson JC, Syed IA, Korol EE, Waser NA, Yu MB, Juneja R. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Feb;19(2):228-238. doi: 10.1111/dom.12805. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
Morieri ML, Rigato M, Frison V, Simioni N, D'Ambrosio M, Tadiotto F, Paccagnella A, Lapolla A, Avogaro A, Fadini GP. Fixed versus flexible combination of GLP-1 receptor agonists with basal insulin in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective multicentre comparative effectiveness study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Nov;21(11):2542-2552. doi: 10.1111/dom.13840. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4462/AO/18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.