"TRAcheostomy With Single Use Bronchoscopes vs. Conventional Bronchoscopes"

NCT ID: NCT03952247

Last Updated: 2019-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-15

Study Completion Date

2019-11-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care is usually performed by conventional multi use bronchoscopy. Recently a single use bronchoscope has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization.

For feasibility evaluation, 23 patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheostomy with optical guidance by the Ambu® aScopeTM 4 bronchoscope and 23 patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheostomy with a conventional bronchoscope (Olympus BF Type P60). The primary end point is the visualization through the single use bronchoscope of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheostomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score, see detailed description).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Long-term ventilated critically ill patients often receive a tracheostomy to facilitate weaning from the ventilator and for prevention of secondary complications by the endotracheal tube. Besides surgical tracheostomy in which a muco-cutaneous fistula is prepared between trachea and outer skin, percutaneous tracheostomy (PDT) has been introduced, in which a cannula is being inserted into the trachea. After introduction of a guidewire, the trachea is then dilated. This intervention should be led by optical guidance, i. e. to verify the correct point of tracheal cannulation between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage and to minimize the risk for accidental injury to the membranous part of the trachea. Usually, optical guidance is performed by conventional multi use bronchoscopy. During bronchoscopy in ventilated patients, a drop in minute ventilation or an increase of carbon dioxide partial pressure with a consecutive respiratory acidosis may occur. Recently, a single use bronchoscope has been introduced that permits a continuous visualisation of the trachea on a monitor connected to the camera (Ambu® aScopeTM 4, Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark) . In this study, it is being evaluated whether the optical guidance during PDT can be performed by the Ambu® aScope 4. The advantage of a single use bronchoscope for percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy in comparison to a conventional reuseable bronchoscope is that there is no need for repair or decontamination after use.

Methods:

Design of Study/ No. of Patients:

Randomized, prospective study/ 46 patients With a sample size of 46 (randomized 1:1 in 2 groups of 23 each) a difference of 35% on a visualization score \[6\] may be seen with an α-error of 0,05 and a β-error of 1-0,8.

Procedures:

* screening for study inclusion according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.
* Percutaneous tracheostomy with Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique
* Visualization of PDT via a conventional multi use bronchoscope vs the aScopeTM 4 single use bronchoscope.

study inclusion: All patients being treated in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine receiving percutaneous tracheostomy due to long term ventilation are screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Details of study-procedures:

Bronchoscopy:

The bronchoscopy for percutaneous tracheostomy is done according to the standard operating procedure of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. Furthermore, during this study the bronchoscopy is done by a physician with an experience of more than 200 bronchoscopies.

Percutaneous Tracheostomy:

The tracheostomy is performed according to the Ciaglia Blue Rhino method(Ciaglia Blue Rhino® G2, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). After skin incision and an optional blunt dissection of the subcutaneous tissue, the trachea is cannulated between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage.

Visualization is provided by a conventional multi use bronchoscope or by a single use bronchoscope. Should visualization be insufficient by a single use bronchoscope backup is provided by a conventional multi use bronchoscope.

The tracheostomy is performed by an experienced fellow or attending physician. rating of visualization of tracheal structures and ventilation during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy:

Rating (each item 1 to 4 points)

A) Identification of: thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, 1st-3rd tracheal cartilage:

1 Reliable identification; 2 Only cricoid cartilage and tracheal cartilages; 3 Only tracheal cartilages; 4 No vision on tracheal structures

B) Visualization of tracheal circumference:

1 Complete; 2 circumference 1/3 to 2/3 of circumference; 3 Only small parts of trachea; 4 No vision on tracheal structures

C) Monitoring puncture: midline + level below 1st or 2nd tracheal cartilage:

1 Reliable identification; 2 Midline sure Level uncertain, but below the 1st tracheal cartilage; 3 Level of puncture uncertain; 4 No vision on tracheal structures

D) Monitoring dilatation Anterior wall and Pars membranacea (P.m.) visible:

1 Reliable identification; 2 P.m. only; 3 Only small parts of trachea visible, no control of P.m.; 4 No vision on tracheal structures

E) Quality of Ventilation Before puncture and worst ventilation during PDT, respectively:

1 Minute ventilation (MV) as before starting tracheotomy; 2 MV \< 2 L/min or oxygen saturation (SO2) 80-90% (\>2minutes); 3 MV \< 0,5l /min or SO2 70 - 79% (\> 2 minutes); 4 MV = 0 or SO2 \< 70% (\> 2 minutes)

F) Quality of the suction channel:

1 Uncomplicated suction of secretion; 2 suction only under flush; 3 suction only possible after multiple removing and flushing of the bronchoscope.; 4 suction not possible.

Consent: all patients or their legal surrogate give written informed consent.

Data protection: Data are anonymized.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel Assignment
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single Use Bronchoscopy

optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by single use bronchoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Single Use Bronchoscopy for PDT

Intervention Type DEVICE

optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by single use bronchoscopy

Conventional Multi Use Bronchoscopy

optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional multi use bronchoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Multi Use Bronchoscopy for PDT

Intervention Type DEVICE

optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional multi use bronchoscopy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single Use Bronchoscopy for PDT

optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by single use bronchoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Multi Use Bronchoscopy for PDT

optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional multi use bronchoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving percutaneous tracheotomy in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine.
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* No consent
* Direct laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jörn Grensemann, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dreher M, Kluge S. [Airway devices in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2014 Jun;68(6):371-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365318. Epub 2014 Mar 25. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24668495 (View on PubMed)

Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.6.715.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3996056 (View on PubMed)

Braune S, Kluge S. [Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1265-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280549. Epub 2011 May 31. No abstract available. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21630175 (View on PubMed)

Vargas M, Sutherasan Y, Antonelli M, Brunetti I, Corcione A, Laffey JG, Putensen C, Servillo G, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care. 2015 Aug 13;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1013-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26271742 (View on PubMed)

Grensemann J, Eichler L, Kahler S, Jarczak D, Simon M, Pinnschmidt HO, Kluge S. Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT). Crit Care. 2017 Dec 29;21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29284503 (View on PubMed)

Baumann HJ, Kemei C, Kluge S. [Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2010 Dec;64(12):769-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255743. Epub 2010 Sep 20. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20857374 (View on PubMed)

Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K. Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11004042 (View on PubMed)

Linstedt U, Zenz M, Krull K, Hager D, Prengel AW. Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a comparison of visibility of intratracheal structures. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1076-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27fb4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20357150 (View on PubMed)

Tariparast PA, Brockmann A, Hartwig R, Kluge S, Grensemann J. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with single use bronchoscopes versus reusable bronchoscopes - a prospective randomized trial (TraSUB). BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01618-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35366806 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TraSUB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.