Open-label, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of TreT in Subjects With PAH Currently Using Tyvaso

NCT ID: NCT03950739

Last Updated: 2024-11-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-17

Study Completion Date

2023-08-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a Phase 1b safety and tolerability single-sequence study in which PAH subjects on a stable regimen of Tyvaso switched to a corresponding dose of TreT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

United Therapeutics Corporation (UTC) developed a combination drug-device product comprised of a dry powder formulation of Treprostinil Inhalation Powder (TreT) and a small, portable, dry powder inhaler. In this Phase 1b safety and tolerability study, patients with PAH on a stable dose of Tyvaso (6 to 12 breaths 4 times daily \[QID\]) were evaluated after switching to a corresponding dose of TreT. Patients underwent PK assessments, safety assessments, a 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and questionnaires for satisfaction/preference for inhaled devices and patient-reported PAH symptoms and impact. Following 3 weeks of treatment with TreT, patients were offered the opportunity to participate in the Optional Extension Phase until the drug/device became commercially available.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Single-sequence in which subjects on a stable regimen of Tyvaso switched to a corresponding dose of TreT
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tyvaso to TreT

Each subject received a corresponding dose of TreT for 3 weeks during the Treatment Phase based on the subject's current stable Tyvaso dose.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treprostinil Inhalation Powder

Intervention Type DRUG

Treprostinil inhalation powder single-use cartridges containing either 32 or 48 micrograms of treprostinil per cartridge (QID)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treprostinil Inhalation Powder

Treprostinil inhalation powder single-use cartridges containing either 32 or 48 micrograms of treprostinil per cartridge (QID)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TreT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject voluntarily gave informed consent to participate in the study.
2. Subject was aged 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent.
3. Women of childbearing potential were those who had experienced menarche and who had not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or were not postmenopausal (defined as amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months). WOCBP must have been nonpregnant (as confirmed by a urine pregnancy test at Screening prior to initiating study medication), nonlactating, and did 1 of the following:

1. Abstained from intercourse (when it was in line with their preferred and usual lifestyle), or
2. Used 2 medically acceptable, highly effective forms of contraception for the duration of study, and at least 30 days after discontinuing TreT. Medically acceptable, highly effective forms of contraception included approved hormonal contraceptives (oral, injectable, and implantable), intrauterine devices or systems, and barrier methods (such as a condom or diaphragm) when used with a spermicide.
4. Males with a partner of childbearing potential must have used a condom for the duration of treatment and for at least 48 hours after discontinuing TreT.
5. Subject was diagnosed with PAH as defined by the following World Health Organization (WHO) Group 1 categories:

1. Idiopathic/familial
2. Associated with unrepaired or repaired congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts (repaired ≥5 years prior to Screening)
3. Associated with collagen vascular disease
4. Associated with human immunodeficiency virus
5. Associated with appetite suppressant/other drug or toxin use
6. Subject must have started Tyvaso ≥3 months prior to the Baseline Visit and was currently on a stable regimen (no change in dose within 30 days of Baseline Visit) of Tyvaso (6 to 12 breaths QID).
7. Baseline 6MWD ≥150 m.
8. If the subject was currently receiving other approved background therapy (eg, endothelin receptor antagonist or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor or both), the subject must have been on a stable dose with no additions or discontinuations for a minimum of 30 days prior to Screening.
9. The subject had evidence of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥60% and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio ≥60% during the 6 months prior to enrollment.
10. In the opinion of the Investigator, the subject was able to communicate effectively with study personnel, and was considered reliable, willing, and likely to be cooperative with protocol requirements, including all study visits.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject was pregnant or lactating.
2. Subject was diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension for reasons other than WHO Group 1 as outlined in Inclusion Criterion 5 (including but not limited to portal hypertension, chronic thromboembolic disease, pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, hemolytic anemia, sarcoidosis).
3. Subject had a history of uncontrolled sleep apnea, parenchymal lung disease, or hemodynamically significant left-sided heart disease (including but not limited to aortic or mitral valve disease, pericardial constriction, restrictive or congestive cardiomyopathy, or coronary artery disease).
4. Subject was currently taking any other prostacyclin analogue or agonist, including but not limited to selexipag, epoprostenol, iloprost, or beraprost; except for acute vasoreactivity testing.
5. Subject experienced an acute exacerbation of disease or hospitalization for any reason within 30 days of the Screening Visit or between Screening and Baseline.
6. Subject was WHO Functional Class IV at Screening.
7. Subject had used any investigational drug/device or participated in any other investigational study with therapeutic intent within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
8. Subject had a history of anaphylaxis, a documented hypersensitivity reaction, or a clinically significant idiosyncratic reaction to treprostinil or excipients in the investigational product.
9. Subject had conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the subject ineligible.
10. Subject was not able to perform inhalation maneuvers that met inspiratory training criteria.
11. Subject had a musculoskeletal disorder (eg, arthritis affecting the lower limbs, recent hip or knee joint replacement) or any disease that would likely be the primary limit to ambulation, or was connected to a machine that was not portable enough to allow for a 6MWT.
12. Subject had a new type of chronic therapy (including but not limited to oxygen, a different class of vasodilator, diuretic, and digoxin) for pulmonary hypertension added within 30 days of the Screening Phase.
13. Initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation within 12 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United Therapeutics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Department of Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Ascension / St. Vincent's Lung Institute

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida Center for Advanced Lung Disease

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Florida

Weston, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

The University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville Clinical Trials Unit

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Medical Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center Division of Cardiology

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Penn Medicine University City

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Pulmonary Associates of Richmond, Inc.

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sahay S, Palevsky H, El-Kersh K, Restrepo-Jaramillo R, Bajwa AA, Desai S, Joly JM, Spikes LA, Eggert MS, Johri S, Shapiro SM, Fisher MR, Shah TG, Ramani GV, Mehta JP, Thrasher CM, Deng C, Smith P, Broderick M, Burger CD. BREEZE Optional Extension Phase: Long-term safety and efficacy of treprostinil dry powder inhaler (Tyvaso DPI) in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Respir Med. 2025 Aug 27;248:108318. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108318. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40882760 (View on PubMed)

Spikes LA, Bajwa AA, Burger CD, Desai SV, Eggert MS, El-Kersh KA, Fisher MR, Johri S, Joly JM, Mehta J, Palevsky HI, Ramani GV, Restrepo-Jaramillo R, Sahay S, Shah TG, Deng C, Miceli M, Smith P, Shapiro SM. BREEZE: Open-label clinical study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of treprostinil inhalation powder as Tyvaso DPI in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulm Circ. 2022 Apr 7;12(2):e12063. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12063. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35514770 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TIP-PH-101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.