Elotuzumab in Combination With Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (E-KRd) Versus KRd in MM

NCT ID: NCT03948035

Last Updated: 2023-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

576 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-28

Study Completion Date

2029-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Of the next-generation compounds, the monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) have recently attracted a lot of interest in MM. The anti-SLAMF7 directed moAb elotuzumab has completed phase III trials in MM patients. One phase III trial in MM patients with one to three prior lines of therapy compared elotuzumab-Rd with standard Rd. The triple combination was shown to significantly prolong PFS in this patient cohort with a greater proportion of patients in at least very good partial response (VGPR) when compared to subjects on Rd. Notably, the rate of infusion-related reactions with this specific moAb was very low, with an overall rate of 10% in premedicated patients and only 1% of Grade 3 severity. Grades 4/5 infusion-related reactions were absent and only 1% of patients on elotuzumab discontinued for infusion-related reactions. Of particular interest is the observation in this trial, that response and PFS were independent of cytogenetic high-risk features, i.e., deletion of chromosome 17p and translocation t(4;14). This effect distinguishes elotuzumab from most, if not all, other drug-based approaches.

The investigators assume that incorporating the moAb into the KRd triple induction regimen should result in an even higher rate of deep (negative for MRD in conjunction with at least very good partial response \[VGPR\] as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\]) with these responses occurring independently of cytogenetic risk. Due to potential interference of elotuzumab with serum immune fixation, the investigators chose VGPR rather than complete response (CR) to exclude false-positive immunofixation results. Furthermore the investigators hypothesize that combining elotuzumab with lenalidomide should prolong PFS further.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer originating from the antibody-secreting plasma cell and characterized by abnormal accumulation of clonal plasma cells in bone marrow. In Europe, 3.8 new cases of MM and 2.2 deaths per 100,000 individuals (age-standardized rate) due to MM were estimated in 2012.

Treatment options for myeloma patients have markedly improved during the last decades.

For frontline treatment, high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy followed by reinfusion of autologous peripheral blood stem cells has been a standard of care since 1996. Introduction of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide led to improvement in remission rates and survival in newly diagnosed patients. However, high-dose chemotherapy remains essential for achievement of long-lasting remissions even in the era of novel agents.

While high-dose melphalan chemotherapy (HDT) plus autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a standard in eligible, medically fit subjects, defining an optimal pre- and post HDT approach is subject to rapidly evolving novel-compound based options. In 2010, a group from the U.S. presented results on the combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (VRd) in newly diagnosed patients with an overall response rate of 98%, however without systematic consolidation by HDT. The next-generation proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib is more active and very well tolerated in terms of peripheral neuropathy and gastrointestinal adverse effects. A randomized phase III trial in pretreated myeloma patients found the triple regimen of carfilzomib and lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) to be superior to standard-Rd in terms of depth of response; progression-free survival (PFS) and, most importantly, overall survival (OS). At the 2015 annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology as well as the European Society of Hematology, this regimen (KRd) was found to be exceptionally effective in a phase 2 trial when given in newly diagnosed patients in a prolonged fashion: patients received four KRd induction cycles prior to HDT. The latter was followed by an additional 4 consolidation and 8 maintenance cycles with KRd, followed by lenalidomide maintenance thereafter. The most appealing effect was the high rate of deep remissions: stringent complete response (sCR) rate increased from 22% following 4 x KRd and HDT to more than 80% following all 18 cycles. Notably, the vast majority of patients in sCR also were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD) as assessed by 10-color flow cytometry. MRD negativity probably has a major impact on long-term disease control as was recently shown in a French prospective trial investigating in the combination of VRd prior and post HDT followed by lenalidomide maintenance.

Of the next-generation compounds, the monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) have recently attracted a lot of interest in MM. The anti-SLAMF7 directed moAb elotuzumab has completed phase III trials in MM patients. One phase III trial in MM patients with one to three prior lines of therapy compared elotuzumab-Rd with standard Rd. The triple combination was shown to significantly prolong PFS in this patient cohort with a greater proportion of patients in at least very good partial response (VGPR) when compared to subjects on Rd. Notably, the rate of infusion-related reactions with this specific moAb was very low, with an overall rate of 10% in premedicated patients and only 1% of Grade 3 severity. Grades 4/5 infusion-related reactions were absent and only 1% of patients on elotuzumab discontinued for infusion-related reactions. Of particular interest is the observation in this trial, that response and PFS were independent of cytogenetic high-risk features, i.e., deletion of chromosome 17p and translocation t(4;14). This effect distinguishes elotuzumab from most, if not all, other drug-based approaches.

The investigators assume that incorporating the moAb into the KRd triple induction regimen should result in an even higher rate of deep (negative for MRD in conjunction with at least very good partial response \[VGPR\] as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\]) with these responses occurring independently of cytogenetic risk. Due to potential interference of elotuzumab with serum immune fixation,the investigators chose VGPR rather than complete response (CR) to exclude false-positive immunofixation results. Furthermore the investigators hypothesize that combining elotuzumab with lenalidomide should prolong PFS further.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

E-KRd/ Arm A

Induction/ Consolidation: Elotuzumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone (E-KRd), autologous stem cell transplant, Maintenance: Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Elotuzumab

Intervention Type DRUG

i.v. infusion. Induction 6 cycles: 10mg/kg BW D1,8,15,22 of cycle 1 and 2, D1,15 of cycles 3-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 10mg/kg BW D1,15 of cycle 1-4. Maintenance 28-day cycles: 20mg/kg BW D1 of each 28-day cycle.

Carfilzomib

Intervention Type DRUG

i.v. infusion. Induction 6 cycles: 20 mg/m² on D1 and 2 of cycle 1, 36 mg/m² on D8, 9, 15, 16 of cycle 1, 36 mg/m² on D1,2,8,9,15,16 of cycle 2-6; Consolidation 4 cycles: 36 mg/m² on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 of cycles 1-4.

Lenalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

hard capsule for oral use. Induction 6 cycles: 25mg D1-21 of cycle 1-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 15mg D1-21 of cycle 1, 25mg D1-21 ov cycle 2-4. Maintenance 28-day cycles: 10mg D1-28 of cycle 1,2,3, 15mg D1-28 of cycle 4 and all subsequent cycles.

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

orally and i.v. IN ARM A:Induction 6 cycles: 28mg p.o. and 8mg i.v. D1,8,15,22 of cycles 1-2 and D1,15 of cycles 3-6, 40mg p.o. D8,22 of cycle 3-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 28mg p.o. and 8mg i.v. D1,15 of cycle 1-4 and 20mg p.o. D8,22 of cycle 1-4. IN ARM B: Induction 6 cycles: 40mg p.o. D1,8,15,22 of cycles 1-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 20mg p.o. D1,8,15, 22 of cycle 1-4 .

autologous stem cell transplant

Intervention Type OTHER

autologous stem cell transplant

KRd/ Arm B

Induction/ Consolidation: Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone (KRd), autologous stem cell transplant, Maintenance: Lenalidomide

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carfilzomib

Intervention Type DRUG

i.v. infusion. Induction 6 cycles: 20 mg/m² on D1 and 2 of cycle 1, 36 mg/m² on D8, 9, 15, 16 of cycle 1, 36 mg/m² on D1,2,8,9,15,16 of cycle 2-6; Consolidation 4 cycles: 36 mg/m² on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 of cycles 1-4.

Lenalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

hard capsule for oral use. Induction 6 cycles: 25mg D1-21 of cycle 1-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 15mg D1-21 of cycle 1, 25mg D1-21 ov cycle 2-4. Maintenance 28-day cycles: 10mg D1-28 of cycle 1,2,3, 15mg D1-28 of cycle 4 and all subsequent cycles.

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

orally and i.v. IN ARM A:Induction 6 cycles: 28mg p.o. and 8mg i.v. D1,8,15,22 of cycles 1-2 and D1,15 of cycles 3-6, 40mg p.o. D8,22 of cycle 3-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 28mg p.o. and 8mg i.v. D1,15 of cycle 1-4 and 20mg p.o. D8,22 of cycle 1-4. IN ARM B: Induction 6 cycles: 40mg p.o. D1,8,15,22 of cycles 1-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 20mg p.o. D1,8,15, 22 of cycle 1-4 .

autologous stem cell transplant

Intervention Type OTHER

autologous stem cell transplant

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Elotuzumab

i.v. infusion. Induction 6 cycles: 10mg/kg BW D1,8,15,22 of cycle 1 and 2, D1,15 of cycles 3-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 10mg/kg BW D1,15 of cycle 1-4. Maintenance 28-day cycles: 20mg/kg BW D1 of each 28-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Carfilzomib

i.v. infusion. Induction 6 cycles: 20 mg/m² on D1 and 2 of cycle 1, 36 mg/m² on D8, 9, 15, 16 of cycle 1, 36 mg/m² on D1,2,8,9,15,16 of cycle 2-6; Consolidation 4 cycles: 36 mg/m² on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 of cycles 1-4.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide

hard capsule for oral use. Induction 6 cycles: 25mg D1-21 of cycle 1-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 15mg D1-21 of cycle 1, 25mg D1-21 ov cycle 2-4. Maintenance 28-day cycles: 10mg D1-28 of cycle 1,2,3, 15mg D1-28 of cycle 4 and all subsequent cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

orally and i.v. IN ARM A:Induction 6 cycles: 28mg p.o. and 8mg i.v. D1,8,15,22 of cycles 1-2 and D1,15 of cycles 3-6, 40mg p.o. D8,22 of cycle 3-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 28mg p.o. and 8mg i.v. D1,15 of cycle 1-4 and 20mg p.o. D8,22 of cycle 1-4. IN ARM B: Induction 6 cycles: 40mg p.o. D1,8,15,22 of cycles 1-6. Consolidation 4 cycles: 20mg p.o. D1,8,15, 22 of cycle 1-4 .

Intervention Type DRUG

autologous stem cell transplant

autologous stem cell transplant

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Empliciti® Kyprolis® Revlimid® Fortecortin®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)
* Patient must not have been previously treated with any prior systemic therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma (only dexamethasone at a cumulative dose of 320 mg; plasmapheresis/dialysis without concomitant chemotherapy,local irradiation of bone lesions; and surgical intervention permitted as pretreatment)
* Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma according to the IMWG updated criteria42: Clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥ 10% or biopsy proven bony or extramedullary plasmacytoma and any one or more of the following myeloma defining events:
* Evidence of end organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying plasma cell proliferative disorder, specifically:

* Hypercalcaemia: serum calcium \> 0.25 mmol/L (\> 1 mg/dL) higher than the upper limit of normal or \> 2.75 mmol/L (\> 11 mg/dL)
* Renal insufficiency: creatinine clearance \< 40 mL per min or serum creatinine \> 177 μmol/L (\> 2 mg/dL)
* Anaemia: haemoglobin value of \> 2 g/dL below the lower limit of normal, or a haemoglobin value \< 10 g/dL
* Bone lesions: one or more osteolytic lesions on skeletal radiography,computed tomography (CT), or PET-CT
* Any one or more of the following markers of malignancy:

* Clonal bone marrow plasma cell percentage ≥ 60%
* Involved: uninvolved serum free light chain ratio ≥ 100, provided the absolute level of the involved light chain is at least 100 mg/L
* One or more focal lesions of at least 5mm or greater in size on MRI studies
* Measurable disease parameters as follows:
* Serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-component) level ≥ 1 g/dL and/or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours or
* In case of IgA myeloma: Serum monoclonal paraprotein level ≥ 0.5 g/dL and/or urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours or
* For patients with no detectable M-component: Serum FLC Assay: Involved FLC level ≥ 10 mg/dL (≥ 100 mg/L) provided serum FLC ratio is abnormal
* ECOG Performance Status ≤ 2
* Laboratory test results within these ranges:
* White blood cell count ≥ 2 x 109/L
* Absolute neutrophil (ANC) count ≥ 1.0 x 109/L
* Platelet count ≥ 75 x 109/L
* Haemoglobin \> 8 g/dL
* Calculated creatinine clearance (according to MDRD) ≥ 30 mL/minute
* Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN
* Corrected serum calcium level \< 3.5 mmol/L (\< 14 mg/dL)
* Patient's legal capacity to consent to study participation
* Patients capable to understand the purposes and risks of the study, who are willing and able to participate in the study and from whom written and dated informed consent to participate in the study has been obtained.
* All females

* must acknowledge to have understood the hazards lenalidomide can cause to an unborn fetus and the necessary precautions associated with the use of lenalidomide.
* must use adequate contraception and agree to use two reliable forms of contraception simultaneously or to practice complete abstinence
* must agree to have medically supervised pregnancy tests on a regular basis
* must agree to abstain from breastfeeding while taking lenalidomide, carfilzomib and elotuzumab and for at least 28 days after the last dose of lenalidomide, carfilzomib, and elotuzumab.
* Male subjects must

* practice complete abstinence or use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female with child bearing potential while taking lenalidomide, carfilzomib, and elotuzumab.
* not donate semen or sperm
* All subjects must

* agree to abstain from donating blood while taking lenalidomide, during dose interruptions and for at least 28 days after the last dose of lenalidomide.
* agree never to give lenalidomide to another person.
* agree to return all unused lenalidomide capsules to the investigator (with exception of prescribed lenalidomide capsules)
* be aware that no more than a 28-day lenalidomide supply may be dispensed with each cycle of lenalidomide during induction and consolidation therapy and be prescribed during maintenance therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy,
* monoclonal protein, and skin changes)
* Waldenström's macroglobulinemia or IgM myeloma
* Plasma cell leukemia (\> 2.0 x 109/L circulating plasma cells by standard differential blood count)
* Pregnant, breast-feeding females, FCBPs and males who are unwilling to comply with the lenalidomide Pregnancy Prevention Risk Management Plan.
* Patients with high cardiovascular risk, including but not limited to history of myocardial infarction or coronary stenting in the past 6 months; NYHA Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled hypertension, severe uncontrolled arrhythmias
* Prior cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with persistent neurological deficit
* Active infection
* Known HIV-seropositivity, active or chronic hepatitis A, B, C or D-infection (including patients who are tested anti-HBC positive and/or HBsAg positive).
* Any other severe concomitant disease or disorder, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk or which could influence patient's ability to participate in the study and his/her safety during the study or interfere with interpretation of study results.
* Greater or equal to Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy on clinical examination within 14 days before enrollment
* Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization
* Any systemic anti-myeloma therapy within 4 weeks of randomization except a max. cumulative dose of 320 mg auf dexamethasone.
* Any prior or concurrent malignancy other than multiple myeloma.
* Exceptions include patients who have been disease-free for at least five years before study entry or patients with adequately treated and completely resected basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical, breast or prostate cancer.
* Known hypersensitivity to carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and elotuzumab or to any of the excipients of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and elotuzumab or to any other component of any study drug formulation
* Participation in any other clinical trial or treatment with any experimental drug or other experimental therapy within 28 days before enrolment to the study or during study participation until the end of treatment visit
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ClinAssess GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Arbeitsgemeinschaft medikamentoese Tumortherapie

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wuerzburg University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hermann Einsele, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wuezburg University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Univ. Klinikum Krems

Krems, Lower Austria, Austria

Site Status

Universitätklinikum St. Pölten

Sankt Pölten, Lower Austria, Austria

Site Status

LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Medizinische Universität Innsbruck

Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria

Site Status

Kepler Universitätsklinikum

Linz, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen

Wels, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

LKH Rankweil-Feldkirch

Rankweil, Vorarlberg, Austria

Site Status

Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

AKH Meduni Wien

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Klinik Ottakring

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Kliniken Ostalb

Mutlangen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Studienzentrum Onkologie Ravensburg

Ravensburg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Diakonieklinikum Stuttgart

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Robert-Bosch Krankenhaus

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Onkologie Schwarzwald-Alb

Villingen-Schwenningen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Gesundgheitszentrum St. Marien

Amberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Augsburg

Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Sozialstiftung Bamberg

Bamberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Bayreuth

Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Kempten-Oberallgäu

Kempten (Allgäu), Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Rotkreuzklinikum München

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Nürnberg Nord

Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Uniklinikum Regensburg

Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Traunstein

Traunstein, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Medizinische Klinik II

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Göttingen

Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Med. Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Oldenburg

Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Universitätmedizin Greifswald

Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Pomerania, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Rostock

Rostock, Mecklenburg-Pomerania, Germany

Site Status

Helios Kliniken

Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Pomerania, Germany

Site Status

Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel

Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

St. Johannes Hospital

Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

St. Barbara-Klinik Hamm

Hamm, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Münster

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

St. Marien-Krankenhaus

Siegen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein

Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Halle

Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg

Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Malteser Krankenhaus

Flensburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Zentralklinik Bad Berka

Bad Berka, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Jena, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Helios Kliniken

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Vivantes Klinikum Spandau

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Bremen-Mitte

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Asklepios Klinik Altona

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rassner M, Baur R, Wasch R, Schiffer M, Schneider J, Mackensen A, Engelhardt M. Two cases of carfilzomib-induced thrombotic microangiopathy successfully treated with Eculizumab in multiple myeloma. BMC Nephrol. 2021 Jan 18;22(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02226-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33461512 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-001616-11

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DSMM XVII

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.