Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) Versus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) for Induction in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Followed by Response-adapted Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance

NCT ID: NCT01685814

Last Updated: 2023-04-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

406 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-31

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators propose this study utilizing Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) as comparator arm for Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) with the latter being considered a novel "standard" as an induction protocol, since response in general occurs early after starting treatment we decided to choose three cycles of either induction regimen.

Together with the "novel compounds", tandem high-dose melphalan is still the standard of care; it seems desirable to re-address the question of the number of transplant (single vs. double high-dose melphalan) procedures required in the context of triplet-induction protocols utilizing at least one of the novel compounds.

Thus, the question to be asked in the current protocol is whether immediate lenalidomide maintenance (i.e. following one cycle of high-dose therapy) as an investigational agent will result in identical progression free survival (PFS) when compared to tandem high-dose melphalan with deferred maintenance therapy.

Despite induction with novel compounds, approximately 25 - 40% of patients will be in less than very good partial response. Very recently, achievement of less than VGPR was confirmed to negatively impact on both PFS as well as overall survival (OS). Therefore, allogeneic stem cell transplantation is considered the standard of care in patients with suboptimal response to a first autograft.

In the current protocol, the standard for favourable responders (tandem-autologous transplant) is combined with 3 years of lenalidomide maintenance. This approach will be investigated for patients with less than VGPR following a first autotransplant and compared to the current standard of intensification in poor responders (allogeneic transplantation).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

single stem cell transplant, 3-year lenalidomide maintenance

Arm A

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib

Intervention Type DRUG

Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy

autologous stem cell transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

tandem autologous transplant, lenalidomide maintenance

Arm B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib

Intervention Type DRUG

Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy

autologous stem cell transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

allogeneic stem cell transplant, lenalidomide maintenance

Arm C

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib

Intervention Type DRUG

Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy

autologous stem cell transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

allogeneic stem cell transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

tandem autologous transplant

Arm D

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib

Intervention Type DRUG

Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy

autologous stem cell transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib

Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

autologous stem cell transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

allogeneic stem cell transplant

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
* Patients willing and able to undergo autologous and allogeneic transplantation
* no previous systemic therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma (dexamethasone at a cumulative dose of 320 mg; plasmapheresis/dialysis without concomitant chemotherapy, local irradiation of bone lesions; and surgical intervention is accepted as pretreatment)
* Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma according to common diagnostic criteria including presence of CRAB and measurable disease parameters
* Cardiac ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 50%
* Corrected DLCO of at least 50% ; alternatively pO2 \[art.\] of at least 70mmHg
* Karnofsky performance status of greater or equal to 50%
* adequate bone marrow function
* adequate serum chemistry values
* Use of adequate contraception for female subjects with childbearing potential and male subjects
* Bone marrow sample available for analysis of molecular cytogenetics
* Able to administer low molecular-weight heparin as a prophylactic anticoagulation therapy for the first three months(applicable for subjects randomized to RAD) and able to administer ASS 100 mg/d (applicable for subjects randomized to VRD)

Exclusion Criteria

* Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form
* Pregnant or lactating females
* Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk
* History of myocardial infarction; NYHA Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias; concomitant pericarditis or peri-/myocarditis
* Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 28 days of baseline
* Greater or equal to Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy on clinical examination within 14 days before enrollment
* Known intolerance of boron
* Hypersensitivity to acyclovir or similar anti-viral drug
* Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical, breast or prostate cancer
* HIV positive, active hepatitis B, C or D viral infection, known CMV reactivation/active infection, EBV reactivation/active infection or treponema pallidum infection
* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* Non-secretory MM
* Clinically relevant active infection or serious co-morbid medical conditions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ClinAssess GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Celgene Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wuerzburg University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefan Knop, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Wuerzburg University Hospital

Hermann Einsele, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wuerzburg University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Med. Klinik IV, Hämatologie u. Onkologie

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Schön Klinik Starnberger See, Hämatologie und Onkologie

Berg, , Germany

Site Status

Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Hämatologie, Onkologie u. Tumorimmunologie

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin I

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Medizinische Klinik 5

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Malteser Krankenhaus St. Franziskus-Hospital, medizinische Klinik I

Flensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH Medizinische Klinik I

Frankfurt (Oder), , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum der Johann Woflgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Mai

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Abteilung für Innere Medizin I

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin C

Greifswald, , Germany

Site Status

St. Marien-Hospital gem. GmbHKna

Hamm, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes Innere Medizin I

Homburg/Saar, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Klinikum für Innrere Medizin II

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe Medizinische Klinik III, Abt. Hämatologie u. Onkologie

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, II. Med. Poliklinik

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II im städtischen Krankenhaus Kiel

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Stiftungsklinikum Mittelrhein GmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Medizinische Klinik I

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim medizinische Klinik III

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Schwabing

München, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern

München, , Germany

Site Status

III. Med. Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München

München, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Münster, Medizinische Klinik u. Poliklinik A

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Nürnberg Nord, 5. Medizinische LKinik, Onkologie/Hämatologie

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Oldenburg GmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin II

Oldenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Uniklinikum Regensburg, Abteilung für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Abt. Hämatologie, Onkologie u. Palliativmedizin

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Ulm,Klinik für Innere Medizin III

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Schwarzwald-Baar Klinkum Villingen-Schwennigen GmbH

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Klinik Innere Medizin III

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Wuerzburg, Medizinische Klinik II

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-016616-21

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DSMM XIV

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.