VRD as Induction Followed by VR Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High Risk Multiple Myeloma

NCT ID: NCT03641456

Last Updated: 2023-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-25

Study Completion Date

2025-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide as maintenance therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who receive lenalidomide,bortezomib, and dexamethasone Combination as induction therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of front-line therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) is to substantially decrease tumor burden, either in preparation for consolidation with high-dose melphalan therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or as a means in itself to provide long-term disease control. The degree of disease reduction is associated with improved outcome, including prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS),both after preparation for or after consolidation with ASCT,and in patients not proceeding to ASCT.The introduction of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide has been associated with improved survival. Combinations of bortezomib or lenalidomide with conventional anti-MM drugs have demonstrated very high overall response rates and quality of response in the front-line setting, as reviewed recently.The phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide as maintenance therapy in high risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who receive lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone(VRD) Combination as induction therapy.The investigators gave patients subcutaneous bortezomib on days 1, 8,15, and 22; oral lenalidomide on days 1 to 21; and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15 and 12 of a 28-day cycle.Patients are allowed to interrupt therapy for collection of stem cells at any time after three cycles of induction, and to proceed to stem-cell transplantation after four cycles of induction at the discretion of the treating physician.Two months after hematologic recovery, nonprogressive patients are to receive consolidation therapy comprising two 4-week cycles of VRD or the second autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (determined by the attending physician according to the patient's physical condition, willingness and the number of CD34 + cells collected).Patients who do not proceed to stem-cell transplantation receive a total of 12 courses of VRD induction therapy(dexamethasone dosage will be reduced to 20mg from the 9th course of treatment). Responding patients could receive maintenance therapy comprising 4-week cycles of bortezomib on days 1 and 15 at the dose level of 1.3mg/m2 and lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 at the dose level of 10mg.Participants discontinued treatment if participants had progressive disease or unacceptable toxic eff ects not controlled with dose modifications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myeloma Newly Diagnosed High Risk

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VRD for Followed by VR

The investigators gave patients subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 8,15, and 22; oral lenalidomide 25mg on days 1 to 21; and oral dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15 and 12 of a 28-day cycle.Patients are allowed to proceed to stem-cell transplantation after four cycles of VRD at the discretion of the treating physician.Two months after hematologic recovery, nonprogressive patients are to receive consolidation therapy comprising two cycles of VRD.Patients who do not proceed to stem-cell transplantation receive more two induction cycles after obtaining maximum response but no less than six cycles totally. Responding patients could receive maintenance therapy comprising 4-week cycles of bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 at the dose level of 10mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bortezomib

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigators gave patients subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 8,15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle. More two induction cycles after obtaining maximum response but no less than six cycles totally.Responding patients could receive maintenance therapy comprising 4-week cycles of bortezomib on days 1 and 15 at the dose level of 1.3mg/m2. Patients discontinued treatment if they had progressive disease or or unacceptable toxic effects not controlled with dose modifications.

Lenalidomide

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigators gave patients oral lenalidomide 25mg on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. More two induction cycles after obtaining maximum response but no less than six cycles totally.Responding patients could receive maintenance therapy comprising 4-week cycles of lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 at the dose level of 10mg. Patients discontinued treatment if they had progressive disease or unacceptable toxic effects not controlled with dose modifications.

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigators gave patients oral dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. More two induction cycles after obtaining maximum response but no less than six cycles totally.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bortezomib

The investigators gave patients subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 8,15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle. More two induction cycles after obtaining maximum response but no less than six cycles totally.Responding patients could receive maintenance therapy comprising 4-week cycles of bortezomib on days 1 and 15 at the dose level of 1.3mg/m2. Patients discontinued treatment if they had progressive disease or or unacceptable toxic effects not controlled with dose modifications.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lenalidomide

The investigators gave patients oral lenalidomide 25mg on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. More two induction cycles after obtaining maximum response but no less than six cycles totally.Responding patients could receive maintenance therapy comprising 4-week cycles of lenalidomide on days 1 to 21 at the dose level of 10mg. Patients discontinued treatment if they had progressive disease or unacceptable toxic effects not controlled with dose modifications.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

The investigators gave patients oral dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. More two induction cycles after obtaining maximum response but no less than six cycles totally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Velcade Revlimid Dexamethasone Acetate

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient has a newly diagnosis of multiple myeloma
* Patient requires treatment for multiple myeloma
* Subject have high-risk characteristics.Our definition for high risk multiple myeloma :(1) with cytogenetic abnormalities including del(17p),t(4;14),t(14;16),and/or t(14;20) ;(2) R-ISS III;(3) ISS III and no complete remission is achieved before maintenance therapy.
* Subject has measurable disease as defined by \> 0.5 g/dL serum monoclonal protein, \>10 mg/dL involved serum free light chain (either kappa or lambda) provided that the serum free light chain ratio is abnormal, \>0.2 g/24 hrs urinary M-protein excretion, and/or measurable plasmacytoma(s) of at least 1cm in greatest dimension as measured by either CT scanning or MRI
* Subject has a Karnofsky performance status ≥60%
* Subject has a life expectancy ≥ 3 months
* Subjects must meet the following laboratory parameters:

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥750 cells/mm3 (1.0 x 109/L) Hemoglobin ≥ 7 g/dL Platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm3 (30 x 109/L if extensive bone marrow infiltration) Serum SGOT/AST \<3.0 x upper limits of normal (ULN) Serum SGPT/ALT \<3.0 x upper limits of normal (ULN) Serum total bilirubin \<2.0 mg/dL (34 µmol/L) Creatinine clearance ≥ 30 cc/min

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has immeasurable MM (no measurable monoclonal protein, free light chains in blood or urine, or measureable plasmacytoma on radiologic scanning)
* Subject has a prior history of other malignancies unless disease-free for ≥ 5 years, except for basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized prostate cancer with Gleason score \< 7 with stable prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels
* Subject has had myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment, or NYHA (New York Hospital Association) Class III or IV heart failure (see Appendix VI), Ejection Fraction \< 35%, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities
* Female subject who is pregnant or lactating
* Subject has known HIV infection
* Subject has known active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection
* Subject has active viral or bacterial infections or any coexisting medical problem that would significantly increase the risks of this treatment program
* Subject is unable to reliably take oral medications
* Subject has a history of thromboembolic event within the past 4 weeks prior to enrollment
* Subject has any clinically significant medical or psychiatric disease or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with protocol adherence or a subject's ability to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sun Yat-sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hua Wang

professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hua Wang, MD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sun Yat-sen University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hua wang, MD.

Role: CONTACT

020-87342462

Hua Wang, MD.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zhongjun Xia, MD.

Role: primary

0086-02087342438

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MM-2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.