The Role of Concomitant Diseases in Postoperative Complications Risk Stratification.
NCT ID: NCT03945968
Last Updated: 2025-04-04
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
RECRUITING
Total Enrollment
16000 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2019-07-01
Study Completion Date
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study is conducted to assess the prevalence and structure of comorbidity among patients undergoing abdominal surgery and produce the stratification of the risk of postoperative complications by identifying independent predictors for its development.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Incidence of Postoperative Delirium After Cardiac Surgery in Adults.
NCT04828902
Postoperative Delirium
Adult Cardiac Surgery
Covid19
UNKNOWN
Factors Associated With Perioperative Outcomes in Non-emergency Surgery
NCT02455492
Stroke
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Pneumonia
COMPLETED
Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
NCT07239648
Postoperative Delirium
RECRUITING
Modulation of Microbiota Metabolism in Cardiac Surgery Patients
NCT04921436
Multiple Organ Dysfunction
COMPLETED
NA
Biochemical Predictors of Delirium in Cardiac Surgery
NCT03931499
Postoperative Delirium
UNKNOWN
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Advances in modern anesthesiology have significantly reduced the risk of anesthesia compared to the last century, however, the level of perioperative hospital mortality of planned operations at the moment is on average about 0.5% (ISOS group, 2016). Weiser et al. (2016) estimated that more than 313 million adults worldwide are subject to surgery each year. Thus, the number of deaths may result in several million each year worldwide. However, the study of the mortality risk is associated with certain difficulties, because over the past half century, this figure has decreased a hundred times and the study requires studies that include a large number of participants.
Current research focuses on other outcome criteria - postoperative complications. Thus, anesthetic risk often refers to the risk of postoperative complications. The frequency of these complications varies in a wide range, ranging from 3 to 18 % (Gawande AA, 1999, Kable AK, 2002, Malik OS, 2018). The differences in the data are explained by the lack of clear definitions and differences in the design of studies, but the fact that the development of postoperative complications increases the risk of death several times (ISOS group, 2016) can be considered undoubted. However, despite the importance of this issue, in modern literature there is no clear idea of what is considered a high risk and which of the patients corresponds to this category.
Understanding whether a patient is at high risk is an essential task - it allows you to obtain meaningful informed consent of the patient, as well as to understand whether to apply strategies for the prevention of complications (targeted infusion therapy, protective respiratory support, especially monitoring in the postoperative period, etc.).
Attempts at preoperative risk stratification have been made for many decades, some scales estimate the initial physical status (ASA scale) (Young J, 2015) and predict mortality, others estimate the risk of specific complications (Lee index, respiratory risk scale, etc.) .
Scales including intraoperative and postoperative parameters such as the POSSUM series of scales (Whiteley MS, 1996) are also being developed. The analysis shows that in routine clinical practice, these scales are not used very often, due to their limitations: subjectivity, technical complexity and often - low specificity and sensitivity.
Concomitant diseases are the strongest predictors of postoperative adverse events and annual mortality. Monk et al. (2005) demonstrated that Charlson's comorbidity score of 3 or more significantly increased the risk of death. In addition, in most clinical studies, the ASAclassification of physical status as a kind of comprehensive assessment of patient comorbidity has repeatedly proved to be one of the strongest independent predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality, despite the fact that this assessment is based on subjective perception (Watt J., 2018).
The main concomitant diseases that are independent predictors of perioperative complications are diseases of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems (Van Diepen S, 2011). Increasing age, anemia, obesity, diabetes - these conditions also increase the risk of an adverse outcome. Diseases of the Central nervous system and neuromuscular diseases significantly disrupt the function of respiration, can change the level of the Autonomous regulation of the cardiovascular system, lead to significant cognitive disorders and nutritional deficiency, which also increases the risk of perioperative complications (Hachenberg T, 2014).
On the other hand, large-scale observational studies conducted in recent years in a number of countries have not identified comorbidities as independent predictors of postoperative complications (Malik, 2018).
Thus, data on the risk effects of comorbidities are contradictory and may be influenced by differences in the frequency and structure of these diseases in heterogeneous populations, as well as in different treatment strategies for cardiovascular, respiratory and other diseases. The identification of these risk factors is necessary to understand the pathophysiology of complications and identify potential ways to reduce anesthetic risk, such as the correction of concomitant disease.
The degree of risk of surgery, of course, depends not only on the presence of comorbidities and their combinations, but also on the severity of surgical injury (Pearse RM, 2012, ISOS group, 2017), as well as the level of exposure to drugs for anesthesia and anesthetic techniques (Malik OS, 2018), therefore, the allocation of risk groups without these factors is also not appropriate.
Objective: to assess the frequency and structure of comorbidities in patients undergoing surgery on the abdominal organs and to stratify the risk of postoperative complications by determining independent
Evaluated parameters in study:
1\. Age, gender; 2. Class of physical status by ASA; 3. The presence and type of concomitant disease; 3.1 CHD; 3.2 CHF; 3.3 Heart rhythm disorders; 3.4 COPD; 3.5 Bronchial Asthma; 3.6 CKD; 3.7 CNS diseases; 3.7.1 Stroke; 3.7.2 Epilepsy; 3.7.3 Parkinson's Disease; 3.7.4 Alzheimer's Disease; 3.8 Neuromuscular diseases; 3.9 Diabetes; 3.10 Anemia; 4 Treatment received by the patient; 4.1 β-blockers; 4.2 ACE Inhibitors; 4.3 Aldosterone antagonists; 4.4 Statins; 4.5 Anticoagulants; 4.6 Diuretics; 4.7 Bronchodilators; 4.8 Corticosteriods; 4.9 Insulin; 4.10 Anticonvulsants; 5. The type and severity of surgery ; 5.1 Open surgery on the organs of the upper abdomen; 5.2 Coloproctological operations; 5.3 Gynecological surgery; 5.4 Urological surgery; 5.5 Operations on vessels of the abdominal cavity; 5.6 Abdominal wall surgery; 5.7 Laparoscopic surgery; 6 Type of anesthesia; 6.1 Spinal; 6.2 Epidural; 6.3 Combined spinal-epidural; 6.4 Intravenous; 6.5 Combined; 6.6 General+epidural; 7. Integral scales; 7.1 The cognitive function of the Montreal scale ; 7.2 Respiratory risk ; 7.3 Lee's Cardiovascular Risk Scale ; 7.4 NSQIP Cardiac risk scale ; 7.5 Hepatic insufficiency according to MELD; 7.6 CKD Stage by Level of GFR and Albuminuria; 7.7 COPD degree by GOLD.
Order of conduct
1. The data is registered in the Excel electronic database in a uniform format for all centers (the form will be sent by the coordinator to all centers participating in the study prior to the inclusion of patients).
2. All centers need to get approval by the local ethics committee before the start of the study. The study protocol will be registered in Clinicaltrial.gov.
3. The study includes all patients operated on within one operational day at the discretion of the center and meeting the inclusion criteria with registration in the questionnaire of the day of the week.
4. All patients could sign informed consent to participate in the study prior to inclusion in the study.
5. Before surgery, data on the patient and all studied factors specified in the study protocol are entered into the database.
6. All patients included in the study are monitored before discharge from the hospital with registration of the data specified in the protocol.
6\. Every last day of the working week, all completed cases are sent as a separate Excel file to the study coordinator by email to [email protected] 7. The originals of the questionnaires are stored in the centers for the entire study time and for 3 years after its completion.
8\. The summary database is formed by the study coordinator and provided to the centers after the end of the study.
Statistical analysis The sample size was calculated taking into account the fact that at least 10 cases of postoperative complications per one factor included in the final regression model are required. Given the wide range of complication rates in previous studies (from 3% to 20%), we have chosen a lower bound for a more accurate assessment. To include 20 potential risk factors in the regression model, 200 cases of postoperative complications are required, which at a frequency of 3% is not less than 7000 people. Taking into account the risk of data loss, and taking into account as many potential risk factors as possible, the size of the required sample was increased to 12,000 people, which will also assess the contribution of comorbidities to certain groups of complications. For validation of predictive models will be recruited 4,000 additional. The inclusion of the patient in the main and validation group will be carried out randomly.
The character of distribution of studied parameters will be evaluated using the criterion Kolmogorov-Smirnov. The continuous data will be presented as the median and interquartile range for the nonparametric distribution and as the mean and standard deviation for the parametric distribution. Categorical variables will be presented as the number of patients and a percentage of the total number of patients.
For the initial assessment of the Association of the factor with postoperative complications, a single-factor analysis using the χ2 criterion and the Mann-Whitney test will be carried out. All variables with a reliable relationship identified in the univariate analysis (p less than 0.05) will be included in logistic regression if there is no collinearity between them (correlation coefficient less than 0.25). The logistic regression model will be constructed using a step-by-step reverse inclusion procedure in which the presence of a complication will be a dependent variable. Potential predictors will be removed if this exception does not cause a significant change in the log likelihood ratio. The criterion for excluding the factor will be set at the significance level of 0.05. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals will also be calculated.
The resulting predictive model will be evaluated in the validation group using ROC analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshov test.
Current research focuses on other outcome criteria - postoperative complications. Thus, anesthetic risk often refers to the risk of postoperative complications. The frequency of these complications varies in a wide range, ranging from 3 to 18 % (Gawande AA, 1999, Kable AK, 2002, Malik OS, 2018). The differences in the data are explained by the lack of clear definitions and differences in the design of studies, but the fact that the development of postoperative complications increases the risk of death several times (ISOS group, 2016) can be considered undoubted. However, despite the importance of this issue, in modern literature there is no clear idea of what is considered a high risk and which of the patients corresponds to this category.
Understanding whether a patient is at high risk is an essential task - it allows you to obtain meaningful informed consent of the patient, as well as to understand whether to apply strategies for the prevention of complications (targeted infusion therapy, protective respiratory support, especially monitoring in the postoperative period, etc.).
Attempts at preoperative risk stratification have been made for many decades, some scales estimate the initial physical status (ASA scale) (Young J, 2015) and predict mortality, others estimate the risk of specific complications (Lee index, respiratory risk scale, etc.) .
Scales including intraoperative and postoperative parameters such as the POSSUM series of scales (Whiteley MS, 1996) are also being developed. The analysis shows that in routine clinical practice, these scales are not used very often, due to their limitations: subjectivity, technical complexity and often - low specificity and sensitivity.
Concomitant diseases are the strongest predictors of postoperative adverse events and annual mortality. Monk et al. (2005) demonstrated that Charlson's comorbidity score of 3 or more significantly increased the risk of death. In addition, in most clinical studies, the ASAclassification of physical status as a kind of comprehensive assessment of patient comorbidity has repeatedly proved to be one of the strongest independent predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality, despite the fact that this assessment is based on subjective perception (Watt J., 2018).
The main concomitant diseases that are independent predictors of perioperative complications are diseases of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems (Van Diepen S, 2011). Increasing age, anemia, obesity, diabetes - these conditions also increase the risk of an adverse outcome. Diseases of the Central nervous system and neuromuscular diseases significantly disrupt the function of respiration, can change the level of the Autonomous regulation of the cardiovascular system, lead to significant cognitive disorders and nutritional deficiency, which also increases the risk of perioperative complications (Hachenberg T, 2014).
On the other hand, large-scale observational studies conducted in recent years in a number of countries have not identified comorbidities as independent predictors of postoperative complications (Malik, 2018).
Thus, data on the risk effects of comorbidities are contradictory and may be influenced by differences in the frequency and structure of these diseases in heterogeneous populations, as well as in different treatment strategies for cardiovascular, respiratory and other diseases. The identification of these risk factors is necessary to understand the pathophysiology of complications and identify potential ways to reduce anesthetic risk, such as the correction of concomitant disease.
The degree of risk of surgery, of course, depends not only on the presence of comorbidities and their combinations, but also on the severity of surgical injury (Pearse RM, 2012, ISOS group, 2017), as well as the level of exposure to drugs for anesthesia and anesthetic techniques (Malik OS, 2018), therefore, the allocation of risk groups without these factors is also not appropriate.
Objective: to assess the frequency and structure of comorbidities in patients undergoing surgery on the abdominal organs and to stratify the risk of postoperative complications by determining independent
Evaluated parameters in study:
1\. Age, gender; 2. Class of physical status by ASA; 3. The presence and type of concomitant disease; 3.1 CHD; 3.2 CHF; 3.3 Heart rhythm disorders; 3.4 COPD; 3.5 Bronchial Asthma; 3.6 CKD; 3.7 CNS diseases; 3.7.1 Stroke; 3.7.2 Epilepsy; 3.7.3 Parkinson's Disease; 3.7.4 Alzheimer's Disease; 3.8 Neuromuscular diseases; 3.9 Diabetes; 3.10 Anemia; 4 Treatment received by the patient; 4.1 β-blockers; 4.2 ACE Inhibitors; 4.3 Aldosterone antagonists; 4.4 Statins; 4.5 Anticoagulants; 4.6 Diuretics; 4.7 Bronchodilators; 4.8 Corticosteriods; 4.9 Insulin; 4.10 Anticonvulsants; 5. The type and severity of surgery ; 5.1 Open surgery on the organs of the upper abdomen; 5.2 Coloproctological operations; 5.3 Gynecological surgery; 5.4 Urological surgery; 5.5 Operations on vessels of the abdominal cavity; 5.6 Abdominal wall surgery; 5.7 Laparoscopic surgery; 6 Type of anesthesia; 6.1 Spinal; 6.2 Epidural; 6.3 Combined spinal-epidural; 6.4 Intravenous; 6.5 Combined; 6.6 General+epidural; 7. Integral scales; 7.1 The cognitive function of the Montreal scale ; 7.2 Respiratory risk ; 7.3 Lee's Cardiovascular Risk Scale ; 7.4 NSQIP Cardiac risk scale ; 7.5 Hepatic insufficiency according to MELD; 7.6 CKD Stage by Level of GFR and Albuminuria; 7.7 COPD degree by GOLD.
Order of conduct
1. The data is registered in the Excel electronic database in a uniform format for all centers (the form will be sent by the coordinator to all centers participating in the study prior to the inclusion of patients).
2. All centers need to get approval by the local ethics committee before the start of the study. The study protocol will be registered in Clinicaltrial.gov.
3. The study includes all patients operated on within one operational day at the discretion of the center and meeting the inclusion criteria with registration in the questionnaire of the day of the week.
4. All patients could sign informed consent to participate in the study prior to inclusion in the study.
5. Before surgery, data on the patient and all studied factors specified in the study protocol are entered into the database.
6. All patients included in the study are monitored before discharge from the hospital with registration of the data specified in the protocol.
6\. Every last day of the working week, all completed cases are sent as a separate Excel file to the study coordinator by email to [email protected] 7. The originals of the questionnaires are stored in the centers for the entire study time and for 3 years after its completion.
8\. The summary database is formed by the study coordinator and provided to the centers after the end of the study.
Statistical analysis The sample size was calculated taking into account the fact that at least 10 cases of postoperative complications per one factor included in the final regression model are required. Given the wide range of complication rates in previous studies (from 3% to 20%), we have chosen a lower bound for a more accurate assessment. To include 20 potential risk factors in the regression model, 200 cases of postoperative complications are required, which at a frequency of 3% is not less than 7000 people. Taking into account the risk of data loss, and taking into account as many potential risk factors as possible, the size of the required sample was increased to 12,000 people, which will also assess the contribution of comorbidities to certain groups of complications. For validation of predictive models will be recruited 4,000 additional. The inclusion of the patient in the main and validation group will be carried out randomly.
The character of distribution of studied parameters will be evaluated using the criterion Kolmogorov-Smirnov. The continuous data will be presented as the median and interquartile range for the nonparametric distribution and as the mean and standard deviation for the parametric distribution. Categorical variables will be presented as the number of patients and a percentage of the total number of patients.
For the initial assessment of the Association of the factor with postoperative complications, a single-factor analysis using the χ2 criterion and the Mann-Whitney test will be carried out. All variables with a reliable relationship identified in the univariate analysis (p less than 0.05) will be included in logistic regression if there is no collinearity between them (correlation coefficient less than 0.25). The logistic regression model will be constructed using a step-by-step reverse inclusion procedure in which the presence of a complication will be a dependent variable. Potential predictors will be removed if this exception does not cause a significant change in the log likelihood ratio. The criterion for excluding the factor will be set at the significance level of 0.05. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals will also be calculated.
The resulting predictive model will be evaluated in the validation group using ROC analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshov test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Coronary Heart Disease
Anemia
Bronchial Asthma
Stroke
Epilepsy
Parkinson's Disease
Heart Rhythm Disorders
Alzheimer's Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases
Diabetes
Chronic Heart Failure
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Kidney Diseases
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* surgical interventions on the abdominal organs,
* 1-3 ASA physical status class
* 1-3 ASA physical status class
Exclusion Criteria
* the inability to assess the factors included in the study,
* acute massive blood loss, aspiration,
* bronchospasm,
* anaphylactic reactions,
* malignant hyperthermia
* acute massive blood loss, aspiration,
* bronchospasm,
* anaphylactic reactions,
* malignant hyperthermia
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kuban State Medical University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Russian Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Igor Zabolotskikh
Head of guidelines and clinical stгdies commettee
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Igor Zabolotskikh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Russian Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The First City Clinical Hospital. n.a. E. E. Volosevich
Arkhangelsk, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Astrakhan State Medical University
Astrakhan, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine
Chelyabinsk, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
South-Ural State Medical University
Chelyabinsk, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Chita state medical Academy of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation
Chita, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Kazan State Medical University
Kazan', , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Republic Clinical Hospital Ministry of Health care of the Republic of Tatarstan
Kazan', , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
Kemerovo, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Regional clinical hospital №2
Krasnodar, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Kuban State Medical University
Krasnodar, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Research Institute Regional Clinical Hospital named after S.V. Ochapovsky
Krasnodar, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Prof. V.F.Voino-Yasenetsky
Krasnoyarsk, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Burnasyan federal medical biophysical center of federal medical biological agency
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
City clinical hospital named after S.S. Yudin
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
City clinical hospital №1 named after N.I. Pirogov
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
City Clinical Hospital. n.a. F.I. Inozemtseva
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
FGBU "Central clinical hospital with polyclinic" of the President administration of the Russian Federation
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Moscow cancer research Institute named after P. A. Herzen
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Moscow City Oncological Hospital № 62
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Moscow regional research clinical Institute named after M. F. Vladimirsky
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
National Medical and Surgical Center named after N.I. Pirogov
Moscow, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Privolzhsky district medical center
Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Novosibirsk, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Orenburg Regional Clinical Hospital
Orenburg, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
"Republican hospital named after V. A. Baranov"
Petrozavodsk, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Rostov State Medical University
Rostov-on-Don, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
North-West State Medical University named after I.I.Mechnikov
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
St. Petersburg state budgetary healthcare institution " City clinical Oncology dispensary"
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
"Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary"
Samara, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Clinical Hospital named after SR. Mirotvortseva (FGBOU VO "Saratov State Medical University. n.a. V.I.Razumovsky" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Saratov, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Stavropol regional clinical hospital
Stavropol, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Tyumen, , Russia
Site Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Regional clinical hospital №2
Vladivostok, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Emergency hospital
Volgograd, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Volgograd regional clinical hospital
Volgograd, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Yakut Republican Oncological Dispensary
Yakutsk, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Ekaterinburg City clinical hospital № 40
Yekaterinburg, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Sverdlovsk regional clinicl hospital №1
Yekaterinburg, , Russia
Site Status
RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Russia
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Mikhail Kirov, MD
Role: primary
Irakli Kitiashvili, MD
Role: primary
Dmitry Voroshin, MD
Role: primary
Nina Arikan
Role: primary
Mikhail Prigorodov, MD
Role: primary
Natalya Schen
Role: primary
Afanasiy Matveev, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Sep 1;119(3):553. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew472. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, Fu R, Azad T, Chao TE, Berry WR, Gawande AA. Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):201-209F. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.159293.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery. 1999 Jul;126(1):66-75. doi: 10.1067/msy.1999.98664.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD. Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Aug;14(4):269-76. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.4.269.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Malik OS, Brovman EY, Urman RD. The Use of Regional or Local Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomies May Reduce Blood Loss and Pulmonary Complications. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Apr;33(4):935-942. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.08.195. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Young J, Badgery-Parker T, Dobbins T, Jorgensen M, Gibbs P, Faragher I, Jones I, Currow D. Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Feb;49(2):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Whiteley MS, Prytherch DR, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg. 1996 Jun;83(6):812-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830628.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Watt J, Tricco AC, Talbot-Hamon C, Pham B, Rios P, Grudniewicz A, Wong C, Sinclair D, Straus SE. Identifying older adults at risk of harm following elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2018 Jan 12;16(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0986-2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jan;100(1):4-10. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000147519.82841.5E.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
van Diepen S, Bakal JA, McAlister FA, Ezekowitz JA. Mortality and readmission of patients with heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or coronary artery disease undergoing noncardiac surgery: an analysis of 38 047 patients. Circulation. 2011 Jul 19;124(3):289-96. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.011130. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hachenberg T, Schneemilch C. Anesthesia in neurologic and psychiatric diseases: is there a 'best anesthesia' for certain diseases? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Aug;27(4):394-402. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000098.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C, Vallet B, Vincent JL, Hoeft A, Rhodes A; European Surgical Outcomes Study (EuSOS) group for the Trials groups of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1059-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61148-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FARCT0001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Pre-frailty and Rehospitalization in Cardiac Surgery
NCT03949439
COMPLETED
Perioperative Risk Factors for Intensive Care Delirium After Cardiac Surgery
NCT02743689
COMPLETED
Preoperative Risk Factors and Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders
NCT03805685
COMPLETED
Venous Congestion And Delirium After Cardiac Surgery
NCT07285187
RECRUITING
A Prospective Cohort Study of Perioperative Covert Stroke and Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction
NCT03081429
COMPLETED
Implementation of a Cognitive Training Program to Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction
NCT03620968
COMPLETED
NA
The Effect of Preoperative Assessment Clinic on Prognosis and Economic Results of Patients With Coexisting Disease.
NCT03665987
UNKNOWN
Risk Factors for Delirium Following Cardiac Surgery
NCT02548975
COMPLETED
Effects of Perioperative Operating Room Environment on Postoperative Delirium
NCT05551026
UNKNOWN
Association Between Preoperative Health and Functional Status and Postoperative Complications in Elderly Patients
NCT07259837
COMPLETED
Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery During Perioperative Period
NCT07314762
RECRUITING
Patients Experiences of Early Postoperative Cognition
NCT05361460
COMPLETED
Neuroinflammation and Postoperative Delirium in Cardiac Surgery
NCT02688179
COMPLETED
Anesthesia Geriatric Evaluation and Quality of Life After Cardiac Surgery
NCT02535728
COMPLETED
Perioperative Energy Expenditure in Major Liver Resection
NCT05931068
RECRUITING
EVALUATION OF POSTOPERATIVE NEUROCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
NCT06685770
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Incidence and Predictors of Delirium After Cardiac Surgery
NCT00784576
COMPLETED
Incidence and Risk Factors of Peri-operative Stroke in Non-cardiac,Non-neurosurgical Surgeries
NCT01758952
UNKNOWN
Opioid Reduced Anesthesia With Parasternal CATheters on Postoperative Delirium After Cardiac Surgery
NCT05880615
COMPLETED
Cognitive Training for the Prevention of Postoperative Delirium
NCT02963961
COMPLETED
NA
Russian Registry of Surgical OutcomeS
NCT06146270
RECRUITING
Exploring the Mechanisms of Postoperative Delirium in Cirrhotic Patients Through Multi-Omics Integrative Analysis
NCT07012434
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Outcomes After Perioperative Stroke Following Cardiac Surgery
NCT05333146
UNKNOWN
Cognitive Function and Postoperative Quality of Recovery
NCT06905366
NOT_YET_RECRUITING